Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Monday, May 22, 2006

E-mail topic: What do people think about the previous blog being closed down due to adverse reaction from some woman running for an elected position ?

Will this action cause voters to change their vote away from this person ? Did they in effect 'shoot themselves in the foot ' by being so volatile ? Does Giles Co need thin-skinned elected officials making decisions for us ?

116 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I feel like the person should have answered to the public instead of hiding and forcing the blog to be shut down. Who knows if the accusations were true or not the person did not make a comment one way or the other just leads everyone to believe it was the truth and she is just trying to sweep it under the rug-not to smart in my opinion- she should have addressed the issue to the public.

Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

I feel like the person should have answered to the public instead of hiding and forcing the blog to be shut down. Who knows if the accusations were true or not the person did not make a comment one way or the other just leads everyone to believe it was the truth and she is just trying to sweep it under the rug-not to smart in my opinion- she should have addressed the issue to the public.

6:58 AM

I agree with you, when you enter the political field, I thought part of the job was to be able to take a little heat. But then again this is giles county. Things operate a little different here.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think is was SF!!!!!!!!!!

Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:09:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yea, she shot herself in the foot for causing the other blog to be closed.

Thursday, June 08, 2006 9:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

IT WAS NOT SHARA FLACY!

Sunday, June 11, 2006 3:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well…well…that makes it real clear who was behind the closing of, Giles Two Cents Worth, but I had my doubts all along, just knew that was not Shara’s style.

And you are right, Shara Flacy is a very good person and has my vote.

Monday, June 12, 2006 9:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like the sneak is back.

Monday, June 12, 2006 10:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, the low-down sneak is back to her old tricks!

Monday, June 12, 2006 10:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I totally think that it was Vanzant. If not Vanzant prove me wrong...I am waiting.

Monday, June 12, 2006 11:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:43:38 PM

You can forget about Ms. Vanzant proving you wrong!! It will not happen, because she simply can't.

Just like the GTCW Blog, she knows she can't prove the statement was no true. She knows exactly how many people saw and heard her do it. Maybe she thought since it happened in an elevator and not the courtroom, no one would learn about her childish ways.

Try Janet, all involved is ready to let the whole county know what really happen.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is Anonymous of June 14, 6:54 am saying that Janet Vanzant closed the former blog down. Is this what she claimed in an elevator? This is muddling for me. Somebody help me understand.

Friday, June 16, 2006 10:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, two separate issues.

Saturday, June 17, 2006 6:43:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Mr. McPeters
Please keep your word and post any threats to close this site and state who tried to close it.

Saturday, June 17, 2006 6:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So could someone please publish what the issue is other than the candidate who complained and caused the former blog to be closed? Appreciate it.

Saturday, June 17, 2006 12:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Ruby
I suggest you visit the GTCW site and read all the post.

Saturday, June 17, 2006 12:39:00 PM  
Blogger J. Kendrick McPeters said...

"Please keep your word and post any threats to close this site and state who tried to close it."

Don't you worry about that! If anyone ever tries to put pressure on me, I'll shout about it from the rooftops. And I'll certainly name names, too.

So far (knocks wood), no threats.

Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think this behavior will definitely hurt her at the polls.
During the last four years, she has tried to stop the newspaper from printing anything about her, without her APPROVAL. When she didn’t succeed, she would get very angry, so it is no surprise, she closed Giles Two Cents Worth.

Monday, June 19, 2006 5:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

you are correct in saying if she doesn't get her way, she takes it out on someone!!

Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I finally was able to look at the other blogthing but I stilldont understand how our county leader lady made it to get closed down. Please forgive me. Could somebody send in and write it out. i dont want to throw my vote away.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ruby,
The GTCW site is shut down. The lady notified the blog master and said she was unhappy with the statements being made about her and probably made threats.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ruby,
Your vote is valuable and you should guard it carefully. The two candidates running for County Executive, each have a record you can track. A good place for you to track these records is through the past local newspapers. The employees at the paper would help you. Don’t just take someone’s word on this blog, research it yourself.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is NOT THE ONLY issue, Ms. Vanzant has shot herself in the foot over. I bet if we looked real close, she does not have any toes or feet left.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

how will she or husband Joe count without toes

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:57:40 PM,

Maybe this is the problem, no toes to count...so let's just spread malicious rumors about another candidate, so bazaar, people will have to think they are true.

Fortunately, that candidate has a history in Giles County and they are being seen simply as rumors.

Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
how will she or husband Joe count without toes

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:57:40 PM

Comments like this are why the other blog had to be shut down. People look this is blog is meant for public use to try and help us stay informed about what is going on in this county. Please try to refrain from name calling and personal attacks. I will not be voting for Mrs. Vanzant but I do not believe you should be attacking her husband he is not the one holding office.

Friday, June 23, 2006 7:32:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous-Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:57:40 PM,
Lighten up…we all need a good laugh every now and then!!!!!

If a person tried to close GFSZ, then the complaint would be published as declared by this Blog Master and we would all know for certain the identity of the person that closed GTCW, but maybe not, since she operates in the veil of darkness.

Friday, June 23, 2006 8:53:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous,Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:55:57 PM

Subject…malicious rumors about another candidate

That candidate was warned before the election started…she would participate in underhand ness. When a person suffers from low self-esteem they often do these kinds of things. I think the lady is in way over her head and sometimes makes crazy decisions to cover this fact up. Not a smart move!!

Friday, June 23, 2006 9:11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous: Thursday June 22, 2006 2:55:57 PM

Regarding rumors and underhand ness.

Have you heard the latest? If that candidate wins, he plans to move Minor Hill to Alabama!!!!!!!!!! Can you believe that?

The worst part… Ms. Vanzant personally has been calling people that have that candidates signs in their yard and complaining. So far, only one has removed a sign after her employer ask her to remove it. Can you belief the nerve?

Friday, June 23, 2006 9:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Come on now, you know only Congress can change the state lines and they did that 200 years ago.

Saturday, June 24, 2006 5:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why don't we just go out to Hwy 64 ,Move the Giles County sign past McBurg

Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous, June 24, 2006 5:48:27 PM

Minor Hill moved

I realize this seems so out there, but it really happen!

Sunday, June 25, 2006 4:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous of june 14:
I too like Ruby am muddled. Who said what in an elevator?

Monday, June 26, 2006 7:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous immediately above:
obviously nothing was said in elevator since you asked the question Monday and here it is Friday and no answer.

Friday, June 30, 2006 2:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Faye:
IT DID HAPPEN!!!
Why don't you do some investigating on your own...since it is not a secret what the elected official did!!!

Saturday, July 01, 2006 1:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous,Saturday, July 01, 2006 1:57:24 PM
Everyone knows she would just lie about it...like so many other times!

Saturday, July 01, 2006 1:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The two comments above are not any kind of answer to Monday's question from Anonymous. This is probably the kind of crap that closed the other blog down.

Saturday, July 01, 2006 5:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well…well…Faye, let me assure you, if someone shows up at my door demanding me to reveal the comment made…I won’t have a problem naming all persons in the elevator and the exact comment and animation…and by whom!!! Bring them on!

Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear anonymous July 02, 7:29:44 PM,
I am not trying to be smart, but I am not sure what went on. How can I get your address so I can come to your door and ask you?

Sunday, July 02, 2006 10:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous, Sunday, July 02, 2006 10:38:05 PM
I will not post my address on this blog!
Do you know any of the current commissioners…some were involved and would probably be glad to tell you

Monday, July 03, 2006 9:14:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You don't need to post your address but could you at least tell on this blog what happen in the elevator and list the commissioners who were involved? Why would you not do that as you can post anonymously.

Monday, July 03, 2006 3:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous,Monday, July 03, 2006 3:48:53 PM
Let me make this very clear…it was an elected official that did it to the commissioners and one newsperson. They were on the receiving end.

Monday, July 03, 2006 9:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The person making these accusations are very bold behind anonymous and even invites one to her home to find out the answers needed and then refuses to give an address. They make a comment I wouldn't have a problem revealing names seems they made an untrue comment themselves!!!! If you can not post the facts do not post anything. Unfounded rumors are all you are posting as of yet.

Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:25:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To DM
I was referring to the post by Ms Proud, about someone sending a detective to her door. Every word I said is true and I don’t give a rats___ if you don’t believe me or not, your chose. You are just as anonymous, signing only DM, and I am not a she.

Tuesday, July 04, 2006 6:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So are you saying Vanzant was trying to be a tough cookie in threatening to close the previous blog?

Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

to anonymous DM Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:49:46 PM?
Where do you see, I have called Vanzant at tough cookie? I think a compulsive lair would be a better description, since such incidents are well documented.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006 1:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The decision to close the blog was made because someone made an accusation about the professional handling of an issue by one of the female candidates when she was not in the office for which she is running. The blogmaster was trying to provide a community service, continue to feed the family and not take any position. it was a private person with no political ties, no one paying, pushing or threatening, no one influencing content, open to all. It's a shame that the community can't just take this for what it was. Just keep in mind that if you elected officials react in certain ways when they are just running for office.....

Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To,penny’s old friend,

(Just keep in mind that if you elected officials react in certain ways when they are just running for office.....)

Please explain the above sentence. I don’t understand it.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006 8:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Only two women running for office that has an attitude like Vanzant!
Hope this clears up things. Those two are Kim Tycer and Sandy Ralston!!!
As for Vanzant, she has threatened and lied to so many people within the County Government System, they know what she is and 90% of them would like to see her back on her farm in Lincoln County for ever.
The 10% are friends and family of Bodenham that would stand by her if Jesus denounced her himself along with most of the Senior Citizen at the Center. Those will never wake up to the fact she is 52% of the problem and the other 48% lies with those commissioners that will not do what is best for the people of giles county.
Election day "U" the voter will have the chance to make those changes. If you want more of the same, lay down and shut up, keep the same people in office and things will be the same or worse for the next four years.
Three women we DO NOT need elected are: Janet Vanzant, Sandy Raston, and Kim Tycer

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We all have our opinions and your words did not change mine. Of the three you don't want in office, I shall be voting for Vanzant and Ralston.

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I won't be voting for Vanzant. As a woman I have been and continue to be embarassed by the fact that she got her position dishonestly and has earned what I am told is over $200,000 since taking office. The things I hear her say she has accomplished, I hear commissioners say she is just taking the credit for some of their work which she wouldn't get involved in until she saw how it turned out and if it was positive she smiled and took the credit and if it turned out badly she proclaimed she knew it all along.

The Gibbons Ralston race is still an undecided for me.

Can't vote for Tycer either.

But, I believe most of ya'll are wrong about who closed the blog down. I believe that person is a female candidate which isn't named in the above two or three comments and isn't named in this comment.

Now that shouldn't be too hard to figure out.

Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:49:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You've eliminated 3 women. That leaves another six or seven for me to filter through. Don't we have 9 or 10 women running?

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you speaking of only the County Exec race the Register race and the Judge race? If so it would be females - 1, 2, and 2. So if 3 have been eliminated then it has to be one of the other remaining two. Unless you were including commission candidates but from reading the threads it was a female candidate in a major race.

Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I consider a commission seat a major race too.

Friday, July 14, 2006 6:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous won't be voting for Vanzant. The Gibbons Ralston race is still an undecided for me.

this information might help you decide whom to vote for.
after vanzant finished her speech at giles county high school and as she was taking her seat mr gibbons gave her a thumps up as well as his wife.

Saturday, July 15, 2006 9:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

let me clarify before someone takes my statement the wrong way. Mr. Gibbons also gave is wife a thumbs up after she spoke.

Sunday, July 16, 2006 6:18:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I fail to see your point. Is not the thumbs up sign a quiet say to say "you did a good job"? What is your problem with that?

Sunday, July 16, 2006 7:13:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Faye
Not when you are trying to hide it.

Sunday, July 16, 2006 12:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't understand why it was so bad for Mr Gibbons to give a thumbs up to his wife and Mrs Vanzant. If he appreciated their speeches all well and good. Its a free country. Why are you making an issue of something that is nothing to do with you. Was he supposed to ask your permission or what? You are pick, pick, pick and grasping straws to write something negative about Vanzant. This crap is only making me lean toward her. If you think you are boosting Mr Gordon you are not. You are actually damaging his campaign.

Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Faye or maybe Sis of candidate:

I read the comment and I didn't think it was negative about Vanzant. I read it and just thought it was a comment from someone who was at the event. There's a lot of "crap" going around so you will be leaning like the Tower of Piza before long! Also why would you think everybody who makes a comment is intent on "boosting Mr Gordon". Maybe they're just sharing what they witnessed for others who were not there. As for "damaging his campaign" you might want to check on what the Vanzant crew is doing to damage their own.

For want of a nail a horse was lost. For want of a horse a rider was lost. For want of a rider,

well you surely know the rest of this and the point i'm trying to make is eventually the absence of the nail caused the loss of a war. The absence of honesty will surely cause the untruthful person to loose the war. Not a thumbs up or down which happened at some speech but the fact that honesty and truth are necessities in a county leader and the absence of it the past four years has been the Great Wall of China for our county.

Sunday, July 16, 2006 6:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have heard that the current Judge's new friend is damaging his campaign...Does anyone know what the big deal is about her? I have heard a lot of talk and just want to know the facts only.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I AM REALLY CONFUSED. When did the incident take place between Mrs. Harwell & Mrs. Vanzant? If you read the attached letter that was past out in the courthouse, it indicates the Tuesday before the bean supper on Thursday. But, if you read Mrs. Harwell's statement in her letter, she says she was no where around Mrs. Vanzant, her son, her home or next door at Mrs. Harwell's mother's residence on that day. However, we have these people that admit being with Mrs. Harwell when the incident took place. So, which is it? I wish someone could explain why such vastly different stories. Stating the facts and not their personal opinion. It is my understanding the supposed statement was made when no one else was around but, Mrs. Vanzant, her son and Mrs. Harwell. In that case, there are no witnesses and this can all be ruled virtually Mrs. Vanzant’s word against Mrs. Harwell’s. In my opinion, if Mrs. Harwell did not say this, she should have confronted Mrs. Vanzant(as she did from what I have heard) on Monday of this week and handled it like two professional women and adults, before going off half-cocked and dragging people into a situation they have no involvment in and distributing a letter.
Why does Mrs. Harwell feel the need to pursue this like she is? She should be worried that someone will disclose the other unfounded & derogatory remarks she has made against Mrs. Vanzant. How are we suppose to believe her when she has in fact made statements about Mrs. Vanzant before? Is she also going to say she did not ever say those things either? She may have some willing participants to support, listen and take her word that she speaks the truth, but I don't think they know the whole truth. However, there is a lot of talk going 'round and I am not hearing kind words spoken in regards to her. She could have atleast maintained some dignity and respect had she been smarter in handling this issue. I think it would have all blown over, but she made certain it didn't. Also, where does she get the idea there was election tampering going on? This lady never quits! Let me draw some more attention to myself!(as if she doesn’t have enough already) I don't believe she is a candidate in this election, is she? So, how does it affect her???
Rumors circulate constantly in this town about a lot of people. But, I don't see anyone else attempting to stamp out a rumor like she did. Let it go for GOODNESS SAKE!!

Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe these witnesses can attest to the fact that Mrs Harwell was not in the vicinity at that time, and could not have said what she was alleged to have said.

Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I, for one, am glad she didn't let it go. If someone told a horrid lie on you would you let it go. No. So why do you expect others. I admire people who will stand up. Your word is all you have. Mrs. Harwell is right to not let people put words in her mouth. If I am not mistaken her husband is a candidate. Perhaps someone is trying to sabotage his campaign too.

Thursday, July 20, 2006 2:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unless the writer of that comment is one of the ones helping spread the lie. Maybe that's why they want her to let it go. Water too hot maybe.

Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Anonymous of July 20, 2006 11:55:21 AM

You are crying so loud because you are one of the ones spreading the story. Now you are trapped like a rat. But you used to always claim you would put your name on what you write. On the other blog spot. What happened? Your writing is a dead giveaway. Go on and sign it.

Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who are you talking about? You definately have me confused with someone else. It is funny how wrong both of the above statements are. Wanna guess again?

Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

zmbynkDoes anyone out there have an estimated guess as to how many workers are employed at the court house and the number of employees at the nursing home where Mrs Harwell also distibuted the details of this so called rumor/lie? Am I the only one who wonders why anyone who is trying to stop a rumor/lie would feel the need to inform so many people. Is that not also spreading the rumor/lie? Most all the people who now know about this were informed by Mrs. Harwell. I don't think I have ever seen that many confused people in one place. I didn't just hear about this- I witnessed it. Keep in mind also that there were many people who are not employed at the court house, such as myself. It is a shame that we likely won't know the truth about this unfortunate situation until after the election since it seems to have had a profound effect on the voters.

Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Agree entirely with the writer immediately above. The accusations against Ms Vanzant and Commissioner Chris Morris have not made be change my mind. Both will get my vote.

Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I also agree. Ms Vanzant and Commissioner Morris.... my vote for you both has already been cast.

Friday, July 21, 2006 10:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a women that has had dealing with Janet Vanzant, I can say she is a big disappointment!
No leadership qualities at all. Talks out of both sides of her mouth.
As for me I will cancel out one vote for her and my family and friends that know of how she reacted to my problem will do the same.
Maybe one day we can have an honest-upright women in that office but it will take years to get over the damage she has done to all the good women of this county.

Monday, July 24, 2006 11:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To anonymous directly above: Not to pry into your personal life, but could you elaborate on what problem and how she reacted to it? Just curious-seems we just keep finding out more and more unpleasant things about her every day.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:16:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous please keep up. If you'll read regularly you will know why the rumor was denied at the court house and nursing home. That is where the rumor was spread.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous directly above: Maybe you are the one who should try to keep up or did you just fail to understand the part about the many confused people at the courthouse? Please allow me to make it simple for you to understand--THEY WERE CONFUSED BECAUSE THEY HAD NO CLUE AS TO WHAT VICKY WAS EVEN TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!! Are you catching on now? That is why everyone started talking about the "LIE". They had no idea anything was going on until then. With that in mind, how then is it possible that the "LIE" could have originated at the courthouse? As for the nursing home, I have no knowledge of what took place there because I have not spooken to anyone there. I have, however, talked to many employees at the courthouse and was there when the confrontations were taking place.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have seen the handwritten letter and it appeared to me as an elderly person’s writing but I have no knowledge who sent it.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've seen the letter and looks to me as if was deliberately written to make people think it was an elderly person who wrote it. Too exaggerated to be authentic.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let me stop your wagging tongues. I sent the letter. Yes I am an old person. I thought Mrs. Harwell should know what Mrs. Vanzant was doing. I donot know Mrs. Harwell at all. I am old enough to not want Janet Vanzant to win useing tricks. If she wins she should do it fair. She thinks I support her. I don't. I've watched her connive for years at senior citizens. I heard the story at the courthouse in the deeds office. A church friend visiting at Meadow Brook told me she heard the same thing there. Last weekend a neighbor telephoned me. Janet has now told another tale about Jodie and why she couldnot live in town. I donot believe it any more than the other one. It is time Janet Vanzant stopped this. She is a grown woman. It is a shame and disgrace to use her grown son. I am not sorry I sent the letter. I thought about it long and hard before I licked my costly stamp. Mrs. Harwell had every right to know what was being said. It don't matter whether you agree or not. I have lived more than ten decades. I am old enough to make my own decisions. There is nothing wrong with my hearing. I know what I heard. I know who said it. She's wrong if she don't think I will tell.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ten decades! Can't be many folks over 100 years in Giles Co. You will be easy to find.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006 9:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

one who wrote letter said...
She thinks I support her. I don't. I've watched her connive for years at senior citizens. Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:21:58 PM

When I read the comments above I thought it was more than a little hypocritical....You said that she thinks you support her but you don't...Sounds like you are the conniving one.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006 11:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No,that lady is not hypocritical she is just tired of wrong doings. Most all of the people at the center know well how vindictive Janet can be and do not wish it bestowed upon them, that’s all. Have you even been to the center to visit. Maybe you should.

Janet didn’t even show up there until she heard Mr. Gordon had been.

Friday, July 28, 2006 7:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You defend her but she is the one who is pretending to be supportive when she is not. Why not be honest and tell someone what you really think.

Friday, July 28, 2006 11:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just as the infamous "letter" seems to be overly exagerated, so does the "one who wrote letter said" posting--OVER 100 YEARS OLD!! Sounds a little fishy to me. Could it be that the accuser might be the "writer" of both? Just curious.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:12:34 PM, now you are thinking!!! Wonder who else feels the same?

Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:12:34 PM and Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:30:22 PM

Could it be that the accuser might be the "writer" of both? Just curious.

Not really but I can see the two above post are written by the same person. Can you figure out how I know???

Thursday, August 03, 2006 5:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are assuming same writer because of the exclaimation points; however, I gotta agree with that person about who probably wrote the letter in the first place.

Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Faye,
No, that is not why I know two post by one writer. Could you tell me which letter you are referring to?

Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To:Thursday Aug.03,2006 5:54:34---Sorry to disapoint you, but I am anonymous #1 and I rarely if ever respond to my own comments, it's just not as much fun that way. The letter I referred to was the one supposedly sent to Vicky Harwell that claimed that Mrs. Vanzant was spreading a "lie" about Mrs. Harwell. Mrs. Harwell felt the need to distibute copies of said "letter" along with a lengthy statement in her own defense. This was supposedly done in order to stop the further spreading of the "lie". This leads me to an earlier statement that I posted in which I concluded that in exposing so many people to the "letter" and the "lie", Mrs. Harwell herself was only making others aware of the "lie" that she was accusing Mrs. Vanzant of spreading. The point is, the majority of the people would never have known anything about it, had Vicky not told them herself.

Friday, August 04, 2006 2:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous, Friday, August 04, 2006 2:51:11 AM
Why do you continue to place blame on Mrs. Harwell when any blame should be on the back of Mrs. Vanzant and the people she chose to help her spread the lie to so many people at the bean rally? If you and anyone involved can live your lives everyday without guilt, God help you, your day will come!

Friday, August 04, 2006 12:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Janet and her lesbian lover are going to rule for four more years! How will that go over with the COC people? They will probably just look over it as usual!

Friday, August 04, 2006 8:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous....even if you knew that to be true, why would you come on here and mention it. Mrs. Vanzant won the election, so you need to get over it! What she does with her private life is NONE of your business or mine! And why are you picking on COC people as well? How dare you!!!!!! Maybe you ought to visit a COC (or denomination of your choice) Sunday!

Saturday, August 05, 2006 8:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She is the one that brought it into the public by having her serve as her personal assistance for the last four years. I don’t want to pay for it do you?

Saturday, August 05, 2006 12:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TAMMY POLLARD SAID TO ANONYMOUS DIRECTLY ABOVE---It takes a pretty low person to make accusations and attact someones character as you have done in your statement. Furthermore, it is even lower to do so, yet not be a big enough person to at least sign your name to such a statement. Could it be that you are just someone who hasn't educated themself enough to speak of things that might actually be helpful to others. I have known Mrs. Vanzants' "personal assistant" for about 16 years now and have been her neighbor for much of that time. I have every intention of signing my name to this post and challenge you to give me a call to discuss this matter further. My husband, which happens to be a newly elected commissioner in the 5th district, has commented several times on the garbage that some, such as yourself, choose to post. He usually has little interest in computers and after reading posts such as yours he has no interest at all. You, just as all others, have the right to dislike anyone you choose. However, you have no right to attack anyones character in such a way, especially when the accusations are unfounded. AGAIN, I CHALLENGE YOU TO RESPOND. Who knows, maybe you can be persuaded to direct your energy towards meaningful issues for the betterment of our community. Tammy Polard--931-732-4385

Saturday, August 05, 2006 5:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mrs Pollard, Why are you signing your husbands name to your statement? If it is really your post then sign your own name and don’t hide behind his name. Don’t bother to chide me for not signing my name when you are
doing the exact same thing!
Where were your concerns when the Vanzant camp was lying and hurting other people’s lives? But I guess that was okay with you then? So get off your soap box until you can see both sides of a situation.
I don’t need any advice from you my life is doing just fine other than being embarrassed by having Vanzant to represent our county for another four years.

Saturday, August 05, 2006 9:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Saturday, August 05, 2006 8:06:26 AM anonymous, I am not interested in attending the COC since they condone lying and don’t see anything wrong with someone doing it!

Saturday, August 05, 2006 9:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Mrs Pollard, Why are you signing your husbands name to your statement? If it is really your post then sign your own name and don’t hide behind his name. Don’t bother to chide me for not signing my name when you are
doing the exact same thing!

Hey stupid she did sign her name- unless her husband's name is Tammy.(Or do you just have a problem identifying vowels?) I have a feeling that you don't have the b---- to release your name and why are you condemming others of spreading lies when you have no problem doing it yourself. Going to ANY church will not ever help a hypocrit like yourself---just going to church doesn't make you a Christian just like going into a garage doesn't make you a car, you have to live it and you are sooooo far from that right now but there is hope for you because every saint has a past and every sinner has a future but you have to want that future to be bright and good----what will you choose?

Saturday, August 05, 2006 10:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TO:ANONYMOUS SATURDAY AUG.05,2006 9;20;20PM-------By all means let me make this clear for you, the name is TAMMY Pollard. Now do you get it????? Evidently you have no knowledge of my character or you would know that I have never been one to hide behind anyone or anything. I should also inform you that I will readily own any comments that I have ever made, even if I am wrong. However, unlike you I might add, I strive to keep my mouth CLOSED unless I am sure I know what I'm talking about. I hear that there are some excellent Doctors out there now that could be of help to you in venting your anger in a more productive way. If you change your mind about having that chat with me, PLEASE feel free to give me a call. AGAIN signed,TAMMY Pollard

Sunday, August 06, 2006 3:09:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

One question Mrs. Pollard:
Do you thing Mrs. Vanzant lying is okay?

Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:27:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Mrs. Pollard:
I apologize for the mistake I made in reading your name as your husband’s. Please forgive me!

Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:31:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Tammy:
Welcome to the world of politics. I am so sorry these people are giving you a hard time. I do not know you, but have known Tommy for many years. He is a true gentleman. I hope he does well and that he will stand up for whatever in the best interests of this county, regardless of what a few whiners might say. That has to take courage!
Anyway, good luck!

Sunday, August 06, 2006 2:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anon. Sunday Aug.06,2006 9:27:20AM, I would never knowingly defend anyone who does't speak the truth which is why I made a concious decision not to make mention of the "LIE", but chose only to defend the "assistant" because I feel I know her well and have for many years. I simply feel it is just as bad to wrongly attack a person just because you may find fault with their associates, as it is for telling or spreading lies. I fear that we may never have knowledge of the WHOLE truth in this case, which is unfortunate for those of us who simply try to do the right things in our lives. During times such as this we must all take time to remember what we stand for and be very careful as not to be swayed in one direction or the other. After all, the issue at hand is between Mrs. Vanzant and Mrs. Harwell and we would probably all benefit in letting it stay just that. Also to Anonymous Sunday August 06, 2006 9:31:44AM---I stive very hard to never hold a grudge but will always defend myself and others who I feel might have been wronged. I'm sure you are probably a good person who just got caught up in an ugly situation, which will never be of any benefit to most of us. I sincerely thank you for your apology and am glad to accept it. TO ANONYMOUS SUNDAY AUGUST 06,2006 2:32:47PM---Thank you so much for the kind words. I have been with Tommy for 16 years and you are right, he is one of the kindest people I have ever met. I truly believe he will serve the citizens well. I have found that kind words will almost always prevail over ficious ones. We need only to have patience and faith. In most cases the good will out weigh the bad. It would be my honor if I could someday meet you. Sincerly, Tammy Pollard

Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tammy...your kind words are equally appreciated. Yes, kind words, rather than vile ones, would seem more productive. And I have absolutely no doubt that Tommy will do right by the people and give heed to the Golden Rule in his dealings with them.

Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Tammy,
I was not referring to the “lie” between Harwell and Vanzant. I am talking to the MANY LIES she has told to almost anyone she speaks to. I am not accusing her, I am telling you and the whole world, the woman is a liar, plain as that.

Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Pollard,

I want to know if you condone lying? You supported Mrs. Vanzant during her campaign and due to that fact I am already concerned as how you will vote on issues.

Will you vote to allow Mrs.Vanzant to have two secretaries when in the past the County Executive had only one? I want you to vote, NO!

Will you vote for the $6,000.00 raise Mrs. Vanzant put in this years budget
for Jane? I want you to vote NO!

Will you check Jane’s qualifications to see if she is even capable of turning on a computer and has any knowledge of any secretarial duties other than cutting out photos from the newspaper to mail out to the public? Will you make an effort to see who pays for the postage for these mailings? You can’t just go and ask them because you will get a lie. Check for yourself. I am asking you to do this!

Will you support a wheel tax?

Will you vote for a property tax raise?

Did you vote for the Financial Act?

Will you uphold the will of the people and help implement the Financial Act?

Will you support a revision of the LUMP bill? I want you to vote YES!

Do you support zoning of ant kind?

Did you participate in any discussions or attend any meetings to create the “Vote The Ticket” and do you support that group and their beliefs especially the KKK as at least one member does?

What were your reasons for not answering the questionnaire mailed to all candidates by Mr. McPeters?

What are you thoughts on the Hunter and Smith building?

Will you vote to sell the Ambulance Service if it repeatedly doesn’t show a profit?

Are you a Democratic or a Republican?

If you and your wife do know and respect MRS. Vanzant’s assistant Jane, ask her if Mrs. Vanzant is married, if she resides in Lincoln County? When you do, we will then know if lying is a trait Jane has also.

I live in the fifth district and deserve answers to these questions since you didn’t come by my house when you were campaigning.

Monday, August 07, 2006 9:46:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tommy...don't listen to this group of whiners. I know you are smart enough to see what is going on here in this county. But if you ever figure out what their real agenda is, many of us would like to know. They are against practically everything and have succeeded in scaring many people via misrepresentations. Take care.

Monday, August 07, 2006 7:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Pollard

I don't feel like I deserve answers to those questions, regardless of where I live in this great and wonderful county!

Monday, August 07, 2006 7:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am damn tired of you posters raging about the questions I ask of MY COMMISSIONER!! If you are not in the fifth district, then SHUT UP!! I voted for Tommy myself, but I did not get to speak to him before the election and he didn’t make it by my house. I have every right to ask question of him and it is none of your damn business.

Tommy, if you are undecided about some of my answers, just say so. I am not trying to cage you in on any answers to make hash out of you later, like some of these bimbo’s want you to believe.

Monday, August 07, 2006 9:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous Monday, August 07, 2006 7:40:11 PM
I do not belong to a group of any kind! I am only one person that lives in Mr. Pollard’s district.

Monday, August 07, 2006 10:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WOW anonymous you have a real rage problem don't you?

Monday, August 07, 2006 11:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TO:ANONYMOUS MONDAY AUGUST 07,2006 9:08:09PM "I have absolutely no problem with answering any questions you might present to me. I do, however, feel that you might be better served by speaking with me privately. I will continue by asking how you could presume to know which candidates I supported? Not that it should be of any concern to anyone else, I will let you know that I attended the rallies for BOTH Co. Exec. candidates and also had the signs of BOTH candidates. How then could you possibly know who I chose to support? I do sincerly apologize if I did not make contact with you during my campaign. I can assure you that it was truly unintentional. It is almost impossible to see and speak to everyone in such a big district as the 5th. It is very unfortunate that we seem to gotten off to a bad start as I would rather work together instead of against one another. I feel that is only a situation in which no one will benefit. I would like for you to contact me by phone. You may still remain anonymous if you wish, as we do not have the "caller ID" feature on our home phone. I feel sure that once you have the chance to voice your concerns to me in a respectful manner, I will then be able to respectfully give you the answers you are seeking." Sincerly, Tommy Pollard 931-732-4385 email-tamtompollard10@aol.com

Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:18:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tommy, I disagree that we got off on the wrong foot! I did not direct my comments to you, just the smart a___s that are harassing me for asking you questions. I have in no way been disrespectfully to you. If you thing I have, then go over my questions and point it out to me.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006 7:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I cannot fathom that Tommy or any other commissioner for that matter would align himself/herself with a bunch of whiners. Tommy Pollard...I have more faith in you than that. You go guy!

Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear fifth district resident,
I'm just curious, why did you vote for Mr. Pollard if you have no idea where he stands on the issues you presented in your post? I'm not picking on you for posting your questions, because as a 5th district resident myself, I don't know where he stands on these issues either. And maybe that is the point of your post, which is okay too. You just seem educated on the issues facing this County, but it seemed odd to me that you voted for someone that you didn't know anything about.

Also, can we ALL try to refrain from using curse words on this blog? I personally think it gets the point across better if they are left out of the posts. And some of us are just tired of reading them every time we get on this blog.

Thanks for the consideration,
Melissa Greene

Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Melissa,

just curious, why did you vote for Mr. Pollard

I voted for Mr. Pollard because he was the only fifth district candidate that attended any functions for the candidates.

Friday, August 11, 2006 8:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

But I hear Tommy is in the anti-zoners' camp. That is very disappointing.

Sunday, August 13, 2006 1:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tommy...if that statement is true about your being in their camp, I just hope you will think long and hard about it. I still have complete faith in you as a person who will do what's right for the citizens of this county. We all want freedom but not at the expense of those who are equally entitled to it. It all comes down to the Golden Rule and what the Bible means by.....am I my brother's keeper? Good luck buddy.

Sunday, August 13, 2006 7:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous Sunday, August 13, 2006 1:19:01 PM
I don’t know how Mr. Pollard stands on zoning, but if Mr. Holt and Mrs. Howell had made an effort to attend at less some of the functions for the candidates, I might have voted for them also. But, I single shot Mr. Pollard for the effort he did make.

Anonymous, Sunday, August 13, 2006 7:43:18 PM
I think we need representation from both sides of the zoning issue to be fair to everyone. Also, zoning is not the only issue that the commission will be facing.

Sunday, August 13, 2006 10:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear fifth district resident,

"just curious, why did you vote for Mr. Pollard"

I didn't vote for Mr. Pollard because I didn't know where he stood on any of the issues facing this County. I only voted for two Commissioners because out of the four candidates that I did research, I only agreed with two of those running. I didn't get to find the answers to your questions about the other candidates, and I felt like an uneducated vote was worse than no vote.

I will say that since my last post on this blog, I have talked to Mr. Pollard about the questions you asked. He was very pleasant to talk to and he made the effort to call me and explain his positions on those issues. I think if you would like to know his stance, you should definitely give him a call and discuss it with him. After talking with him, I feel that he is going to do the best job he can for the people in the 5th district and that he is going to put effort into listening to those he represents. With that being said, I would ask you to call him to discuss any issues you feel are important to you.

Mr. Pollard, good luck with your commissioner's seat and thanks for making the effort to clarify your stances on the different issues with me.

-Melissa Greene

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:48:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home