Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Monday, September 19, 2011

Comments Made At The Legislative Meeting 19 Sept. 2011

This is the text of my comments delivered at the County Legislative Meeting this morning. The five minutes I was allotted ran out before I was able to finish but Mrs. Vanzant graciously allowed me the extra time to recite the poem I had written at the end. I do appreciate that consideration.

"I greatly appreciate this opportunity to address the commission this morning. Please understand that it is not my intention to be overly critical or belittle anyone. We may disagree on the process but I believe each of you are motivated by a desire to do what’s best. I’m no politician with great skills in tact. I’m just an old soldier who spent more time focused on getting the job done than sweet talking hard headed recruits. So please excuse me if I speak too directly for your comfort.

The first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what’s known as the “Bill of Rights.” These are the foundations of freedom our founding fathers thought to be the most important.

The very first of these important freedoms is “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. Five freedoms; Religion; Speech; Press; To Assemble Peaceably; and to Petition Government for a Redress of Grievances, this in the very first Amendment.

The courts have held that the most basic component of freedom of expression, is the right to freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of that speech.

This amendment has been abused, misused and completely overlooked when convenient. Once this great nation was considered to be a nation of laws, which means that the law was paramount and each citizen could be confident in its equal application. Unfortunately that was and is more myth than reality to many citizens. Just ask a citizen who has been denied their right to address their government even after meeting all the requirements set down by that government. Ask a citizen who is verbally and physically attacked by a government official then told I’m a County Commissioner so what’s you gonna do about it. Denial of a person’s rights may not seem like such a big deal unless it’s your rights that have been violated. The truth of the matter is that when the rights of one are violated the rights of all are jeopardized.

Those who selectively apply the law for their benefit see no problem with its enforcement. Many of you should remember Bull Connor the democrat public safety commissioner in Birmingham who saw no problem with turning the dogs loose on peaceful demonstrators. He had no problem interpreting and enforcing the law, only problem was it was wrong. Many in Birmingham knew it was wrong but they were too fearful to demand it be applied rightly and equally.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was labeled by government officials as the most hated man in America, a troublemaker who was always stirring up trouble wherever he went. Government Officials used real and imagined laws to jail him beat him, do all they could to silence him. They weren't concerned with the truth of his words only that his words were disturbing to their comfort. Even the FBI was involved. Many knew that what was happening was wrong but they remained silent and allowed the wrong to continue. Finally the truth was heard and the wrong was faced up to. His statue was recently unveiled on the Washington Mall.

You, have established rules that support the 1st Amendment but you also have allowed those rules to be selectively applied. Selective application of the Constitution makes for no Constitution. Recently I met every requirement, followed every rule in order to address this Legislative Body, I was denied and the only reason given, was one of utter contempt for the Constitution, that state law prevented my speaking. No such law was named and no such laws exist. My Constitutional rights to speak and to petition the government were violated and the U.S. Constitution was made null and void without a single objection from this legislative body.

As County Commissioners each of you raised your hands and swore this oath, “I do solemnly swear that I will perform with fidelity the duties of the office to which I have been elected, and which I am about to assume. I do solemnly swear to support the constitutions of Tennessee and the United States and to faithfully perform the duties of the office of county commissioner representing the _________ district of _____________________, County, Tennessee. This oath expires when your term of office ends.

Others of this group took a different oath, I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

This oath has no expiration date, just as once a Marine always a Marine, once taken, this oath remains apart of our lives. Some of you suffered and sacrificed greatly in defense of this oath, some of you lost great friends and family in defense of this oath. But In the ease of our comfort that oath has become less and less important until we hardly blink when that Constitution is violated.

Most people understand, at least in part, that being in the military and defending this nation in a war is a very noble and honorable thing but that oath was to “defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”.

We must protect it from those within who seek to destroy its financial and moral strength. We must protect it from those who would corrode and abuse the Constitution that has made this the destination of millions oppressed in their own countries. Blindly defending those who have proven to do wrong is not the act of a patriot but of a coward too lazy to demand right behavior and accountability. Defending a nation on its home front is just as necessary as defending it on a battlefield in some foreign country. In fact it may be easier on the foreign battlefield because most of the time you at least can more easily tell who the enemy is.


"What We Abuse We Lose"

All gave some and some gave all;

And many were never counted,

Their sacrifice was taken for granted.

Then what had been their treasure,

Was lost to mindless pleasure.

For what had been died for

Was no longer worth... standing for.

123 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It was a powerful speech, sorry not all of it was said at the meeting. I was very moved by your poem at the end.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It was a great speech. I hope everyone was receptive of it, thanks.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:29:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Barrett
Fantastic! Do you think it sunk in on all our elected officials?

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Will that be your last speech and your last stand? I think it would be good if you left it at that and never stirred up trouble again.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 4:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:34 Why don't you just keep quiet.
It look like things were going good, but you just have to stir up trouble.
I wonder how you were keeping from posting.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 5:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:34
Good post. My sentiments exactly. We can only pray that it was his swan song. Good riddance!

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 5:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't have to keep quiet 5:26. FREE SPEECH! Didn't you get the message? HAHA

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 6:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First 3 posts were all from Mr. Barrett.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 6:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:58
I thought the same thing. Perhaps he thinks he is Patrick Henry now? Laughable.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 7:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

RS said
To the last two nasty people - WRONG. It was my post to Mr. Barrett.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 7:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Jason said...

It's obvious that 4:34 5:35 6:39 6:58 and 7:28 have formed a daisy chain of heads and rectums so there is no hope for any intelligence to come from them only the same old crap that fills their mouths and ears leaving their brains severely deprived of oxygen that has resulted in the absence of viable brain cells. .

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why would anyone be so angry they have to stir up trouble when it looks like things could be better. All this angry and bitterness will hurt only you in the end.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pay no attention to them, there are just some have to act like babies and have tantrums. Yet they they think they are perfect and everyone else is wrong.

If Mr. Barrett does mean to move I hope he tells who all the anonymous post are.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jason
Did you ever stop to consider who the chief source of troublemaking and strife is here in Giles County? I think you know.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:01 I'm not Jason, but I can answer that. The chief trouble maker today is you.
Things was quiet but you decided you need attention and started stirring it up like a child.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The second post is mine and I am not Mr. Barrett. That is twice you said I was him.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The chief troublemaker is Allen Barrett. Just because someone calls him out on a blog that is read by a small number of people doesn't make them a troublemaker. You need to look at the big picture. I heard the commissioners got a nice five minute nap during his speech. Jason doesn't have a clue what he is trying to defend. Too bad for him.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe the commissioners did get a 5 minute nap. Good for them.
The question is why can't you let it go? It just makes you look bad.
You just have to keep stirring the pot.
Today you are the trouble maker.
I'm not defending Barrett just pointing out how bad you are acting.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:06
You say things were quiet before I decided to stir something up. Wrong. I suppose things would be quiet as long as those like me remain silent about what is said on this blog. We want the troublemaking to stop.
I for one will NOT be quiet when the troublemaker-in-chief gets on here and calls people nasty names and makes all manner of accusations against them. How hurtful and mean can that be? More importantlly, how can you defend it?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:42
What did Barrett say mean and hurtful to anyone yesterday on his post?
He just told about the Commissioners meeting. That is what I meant about it being quiet and you had to get a fuss started.

You were being just as bad as he has been by still,popping off like a child.

I was hopping things was going to get better in Giles County, but you want let it.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:17:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ephesians 4, verse 32:
And be ye kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven YOU.

Think! How can God forgive us if we don't forgive others and try to start anew. Someone has to be first. Does it hurt to be the first one to stop this?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:42 Can not keep their mouth or fingers still. They are Chief of Pot Stirring and Trouble Making. If you will notice several posts start off very nicely and informative and they have to put their wooden nickel in it. I think they are trying to ruin the blog, because they hate Mr. Barrett so much.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heard on the street if the commissioners got a nice 5 minute nap while Barrett spoke they must have been bursting cos of the tight lips and red faces.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mrs. Vanzant did the right thing by giving Barrett extra time.
Sorry that hasn't been done before and maybe a lot of this mess could of been avoided.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

After Barrett talked, didn't they go on with business? I hope someone taped the meeting and will put it out for anyone wanting to see it.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:05 Aren't you listening to and spreading gossip? Hmmmmm?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12:23 You are always hearing stuff on the street and putting on here so why is it bad for me to put on what I here?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:42 Like some other I'd like to know what names did Mr. Barrett call anyone are what mean things did he say before you started posting on this thread?
It seems to me that the first negatives that were posted in the thread was from you. Then you are the one who even carried it farther with stronger negatives. You should be ashamed of your self but declaring others as guilty of what you yourself is doing is nothing but a democrat tactic which you seem to be expert at.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 1:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the "enabler" doesn't speak the truth, why do you all get so defensive? Why not ignore him?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 1:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12:32
I was just giving you a dose of your own medicine with respect to gossip.
1:40
The true enablers are those like you who help a troublemaker keep something stirred up. You just can't stand it that I remind you from time to time. Why don't you guys go help him pack and, better yet, go with him?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Still waiting for 7:42 to tell the names Mr. Barrett called anyone are what mean things did he say before 7:42 started posting on this thread?

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 4:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about we call 4:10 The Enabler Junior? I seriously think they are more of a nuisance and troublemaker.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, Enabler. We dont need to call 4:10 junior but we could pin that one on you, too.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think we will call you Baby Enabler 5:45. You do less than the enabler. Hey, if the shoe fits? And it certainly does.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The true enablers are those who help a troublemaker keep something stirred up.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:46:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

I also would be very interested in what "names" I called anyone or "mean things" I said about anyone in this thread, that caused the __________ to make such claims.
If _____________ was the least bit honest in their posting they wouldn't make up things to try and justify their vicious unwarranted attacks against me, but if they were the least bit honest with themselves they wouldn't post 99% of the gossip and trash they post on here.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

99% of the people in Giles County know that it isn't gossip.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

*yawn*

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:08:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

9:12 If it's not gossip then post some proof. It's really that simple.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 11:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
When will you be moving? The gossip I hear is that you will be doing so shortly. But even if you do, you will have to come back when Mr. McAlister takes you to court.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Barrett, if you do move please tell us who the great one is that just posted to you.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:25 I'm not Mr. Barrett but I can tell you the identity of the one you asked about It's that sound you hear
when sitting on the throne after eating Mexican food with to much spices. His actual name is Montezuma
Revenge.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:35 I like your answer.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:25
What are you going to do...come to my house and beat me up? That's just aboput the mentality of you guys. Am I not entitled to my opinions on this so-called free speech blog?

Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Talk about mentality, where's yours?
You don't want anyone but you to have an opinion on this blog.
So they give it back to you.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see that Enabler Jr and Baby Enabler posted at 2:35 4:06 and 4:35. It is about time for them to get to stirring the pot for the evening.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Montezuma Revenge now that's a name that really fits the enabler.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And you enabler jr.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 7:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who was the first to stir the pot on this thread?


Anonymous said...

Will that be your last speech and your last stand? I think it would be good if you left it at that and never stirred up trouble again.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011 4:34:00 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2011 8:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:46
Answer... the troublemaker-in-chief.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:19 How true the troublermaker -in-chief the poster of Sep 22 at 8:46.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think it was just this threat barrett...it's all the name calling, and rude things you have said in the past..All one has to do is read past post, and it's there, so no need for denile. You have done it. I am glad Mrs. Vanzant gave you the extra time, however I don't think you deserve special treatment. If anything that should prove she is a good person, too you and all your followers. I do not like all the trouble you have caused, and I think your name calling is the most disrespectful thing anyone human could do, not to mention all the money you have cost us, the tax payers...and you can't denie that either, if you do it's a lie. You should not expect others to like, or respect you, nor your opinion on any matter...

Friday, September 23, 2011 3:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:16 Have you ever heard of forgiveness or giving people a second chance?

When I read these last two threads posted by Barrett I wanted to think he was changing. When someone want let him change and keeps popping off like she ate to many white beans that makes them the worse person.
You are so laughable. Keep putting people down, you will be the one to answer at judgement day or do you believe in judgement day.

Barrett will have to answer for his mistakes then also. I just hope he ignores you and changes. You can't and want too much hate in you.

Friday, September 23, 2011 4:09:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

To 23 Sept. 3:16 PM
I certainly hope you meant to type thread instead of threat. If you notice my post was confined to this and one other thread and there certainly was no “name calling or mean words” as was claimed. You insinuate that I have denied writing statements that included uncomplimentary names and used terms that were less than flattering. When have I denied calling people anything that their actions had not reflected? We may disagree on who the people might be but would you deny that there are some very mean spirited, vengeful liars and worse in this community? The problem seems to be that those I have identified and provided evidence in support of, have been people you are either friends with or have greater respect than I feel is warranted, and that’s fine if you would only defend them with more than your own feeble feelings. You apparently feel no problem calling me and others names and saying mean things about me and others without justification but draw the line when your friends and you are called the same names and evidence is provided in support of such statements.
Now let’s talk about the extra time I was given and the special treatment you claim I given when I spoke to the Commission. As I stated in an earlier statement I asked for and was given extra time, less than a minute, for which I was grateful. Are you aware that other speakers have been given more than ten minutes to address the commission? Being given five minutes would hardly qualify as “special treatment” unless you would consider it special negative treatment. Does that prove Mrs. Vanzant is a good person, I have never claimed that she is a bad person only that she does bad things at times. Under the circumstances she had no real choice but to do as she did when I spoke.
I have not caused any trouble only exposed the behavior and violations that have disrupted the comfort level of some folks. Your statement, “and I think your name calling is the most disrespectful thing anyone human could do” is as absurd as anything ever written on this blog. Trampling on the rights of others, treating people differently based on the size of their checkbook or race, lying to people, running off with another person’s spouse, spending your money on drugs and alcohol while your children do without, defending wickedness and those who enjoy doing evil and hundreds of other behaviors are far more disrespectful than calling a person by the name their behavior has earned.

Now you claim that I have cost the “taxpayers” a lot of money. I have filed a total of two lawsuits that involved this county. One was to stop the county wide zoning which included a number of other people. That suit could have been avoided if only the citizens were allowed to vote on the measure instead of trying to cram it down our throats. The other lawsuit was about the violations committed by the Election Office before, during and after the 2010 elections. That suit could have been avoided with a simple apology and admission that mistakes had been made instead of trying to cover up the mistakes and criminal behavior. There may be another suit real soon but to date there are only two.
The question most responsible people would ask about the lawsuits is simply, why was it necessary for either to be filed? The simple answer is when you violate the law and it adversely impacts your life the law is your recourse unless you choose to live outside the law.
As for my expectations of others I stopped being concerned about what others thought of me my first day of high school when I was made fun of because I was from the housing projects. I know who I am and what I stand for and as long as God and I are satisfied I’ll not lose any sleep worried about what you or anyone else will think, I’ve learned that people will think what they want to regardless of the truth. My responsibility is to show that truth and be the best I can be and leave the rest to the gossipers.

Friday, September 23, 2011 4:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Tommy Taxpayer said...

From your statement above, I suppose you are planning to file another suit against the county or someone involved in government. Since you have gone as far as to make that statement, would you enlighten the readers as to what the lawsuit will involve? We may want to start setting aside some tax money to pay for lawyers fees.

Friday, September 23, 2011 5:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No one's business.

Friday, September 23, 2011 6:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:16
Excellent post.

Tommy Taxpayer
Likewise, an excellent post that every Giles County taxpayer should read. How could his followers dfefend him in this?

Friday, September 23, 2011 8:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Tommy Taxpayer said...

It is nice that Enabler Jr. said that it is not our business. That lets me know that they are very close to Barrett. Anyone that has to pay taxes to foot the bill for these lawsuits would want to know what the lawsuit is about. Also, Barrett brought it up so he must be feeling proud that he is going to slap it to the Giles County taxpayers again. If it is a lawsuit against the county or a government official then it is the business of every citizen in Giles County. That is FACT! Don't bring it up if you don't want people to talk about it. That is Gossip 101.

Friday, September 23, 2011 8:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Then back it barrett, prove to the people of Giles County you have not cost us money, PROVE IT OR SHUT UP. POST THE INVOICES!!! PROVE IT!!! I know what they are, seen them...As for the rest of your long post, thanks for letting us know we have even more than the 30 grand to pay. Thank you, Thank you.....I have not called people names, indeed.

Friday, September 23, 2011 9:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:04
Here's what I believe (my opinion) to be the situation with barrett. Put simply, he doesn't see that he does anything wrong.

Friday, September 23, 2011 10:33:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Put simply that makes two that don't think they do anything wrong.(my opinion)

Friday, September 23, 2011 11:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Tommy Taxpayer
If the county government officials would do their jobs within the laws Barrett wouldnt have reason to file any lawsuits. Get to the root of the problem and where the responsibility of costing the county really lies.

Saturday, September 24, 2011 3:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:44
How on earth can you defend this man? NO, he doesn't have a responsibility to sue county government. We have a system in place wherein citizens may petition and address government. Those same citizens can both make their concerns known to their representatives and then vote them out if they are unresponsive. What gives any of us the right or responsibility to sue our government just because we don't like or agree with those who hold those elected positions? Of they don't do their jobs, then vote them out.
You defend a man who has cost this county a lot of money and who may not be through yet. I just cannot understand why you would align yourself with barrett unless you are either him posting anonymously or possibly a very close family member. You might be too close to the forest to see the trees.

Saturday, September 24, 2011 6:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If your representatives would answer his phone and talk to you that is the first way to go. But there are a few that think I'm elected and can do as I please and refuse to listen to you."

That isn't talking about Barrett and his commissioners, it's others.

Saturday, September 24, 2011 8:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A few years ago I was with someone trying to talk to a commissioner we happen to meet in the court house. He thought he was so cute and smart, just turned his head and they weren't saying anything bad to him or being hateful. The old coot got what he deserved, he got beat when the election time came.

Saturday, September 24, 2011 9:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:50 If you will research the laws and have listened to Lucy Henson then you will know if a citizen has a problem with county officials and get no action - then sue!

Saturday, September 24, 2011 12:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Barrett has only filed two civil lawsuits against the county. He won neither.

Saturday, September 24, 2011 10:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He lost and so did the taxpayers.

Saturday, September 24, 2011 10:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is why I don't understand how he can say that he didnt cost us money. He lost both cases which means he had no grounds for a lawsuit in the first place. You can't go aroung suing all the time because you get your pride and feelings hurt. Giles County would be better off if he would go away to another town.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought the person that lost had to pay court cost and the county had a lawyer, why pay the lawyer more than they get each month?

What was the two law suits?

If Barret moves there will always be someone to take his place.

Was everybody happy with Jesus?
How many Americans are happy with Obama?
How many was happy with either of the two Bushes?

Being unhappy with someone is a way of life. We can choose to grumble or just except it. When we complain about the other person leaves us just as bad as them.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 9:18:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

I am continually amazed at the ability of 8:23 to see into the minds of others and into the future.
Take for example the statement, "He lost both cases which means he had no grounds for a lawsuit in the first place. You can't go aroung suing all the time because you get your pride and feelings hurt".

Since neither suit has been decided it's obvious that he has some psychic, or is that psycho, powers to know the future. Declaring that the reason for the suits was because I had my "pride and feelings hurt" show an uncanny ability to know the heart of another person. This isn't the first time they have made claims to knowing what motivates others. These two claims seem to contradict what the Bible says about people knowing the future and the hearts of others. Yet this "Christian Gentleman" claims the Bible as his guide. Could this simply be another manifestation of the witch of Endore?

The truth of the matter is the suit against the election office is under appeal and no decision has been made public yet.
The suit against county wide zoning has held up the implementation of county wide zoning from start to now, that is why county citizens are still able to build a shed, raise their animals and control their own property without permission from some appointed bureaucrat telling them what they can and can't do. Allow the county to vote on the zoning and the suit will go away. Implement the needed nuisance laws and there's no need for county wide zoning.
Laws and rules applied equally for everyone with truth as a normal activity makes for a much simpler
life.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 11:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
I AM a Christian gentleman who totally agrees with the 8:23 post. How dare you. Are you not judging my heart just as you criticized someone on the previous thread for supposedly judging yours? And you spoke of hypocrisy? What a laugher.
As a man of God, looks like you would have a problem with suing people. No? I too am continually amazed...at you.
Say, how much is the McAlister lawsuit going to cost us? Wete I a betting man, I would put my money on Clay.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 1:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why would McAlister's suit cost Giles County anything?

Somebody has lost it if they had it.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 2:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:25 I had also wondered why that case would cost Giles County anything.

My opinion is McAlister and Barret both have to hire a lawyer. Whoever looses will have to pay court cost.
If McAlister wins, Barrett will be out money to pay McAlister.

What does Giles County have to do with it. Are they planning on paying for McAlister's lawyer?

Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:10:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

1:41 where did I claim to know the motivation of your actions or more specifically where did I claim to know your heart? Just another misstatement I suppose on your part.
Why would being a man of God as you say, have any prohibition against suing someone in a non-church matter? Your vitriolic hyperbole is once again proven to be merely a case of too much vapors from spicy food and weak sphincter muscles.

For others who are trying to understand what this person is talking about with any other lawsuits I am involved in costing the county money you may as well give up as he has no clue what he's talking about and no one else can figure it out either. It's nonsense pure nonsense.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
Go back and read the FIRST sentence of your 11:34 post. You should then recall that you did make the charge that the writer could see into the minds of others and into the future. Would you still deny that?
Vitriolic hyperbole? You are wearing out your dictionary. What a laugh. Oh, I forgot to be impressed.

3:10

Mr. McAlister is suing the city as well, right?

Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:20 even you should be able to understand that Barrett didn't make the claim but was simply pointing out what you had made claim of.

I loved that sentence "Your vitriolic hyperbole is once again proven to be merely a case of too much vapors from spicy food and weak sphincter muscles.". It still makes me laugh. What ever else he is Mr Barrett has a sense of humor and knows how to turn a phrase.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 6:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The native is restless today.

When did Giles County start paying for the city's law suits?

Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why didn't Barrett answer the question about the next lawsuit that he brought up? Is he trying to dodge the question? Saying that the outcome of a case isn't made public yet doesn't mean that it hasn't been decided. Smoke and mirrors. Barretts specialty.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 10:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:17 Don't pay any attention to the enabler he started out stupid and went downhill from there.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 10:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:07
The individual you so eagerly defend is the one who started that lie about an enabler. The true enablers are those like you who help promote a troublemaker in our community. Why don't you go help him pack and then relocate with him? Just a thought.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 10:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:07, You didn't get the name Enabler Jr. because of your extreme intelligence. Take a while and think about it.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 10:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Matthew 6; 44
But I say unto you. Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, and pray for them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

Does that sound like you should tell them to move?

Sunday, September 25, 2011 11:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When did Giles County start paying for the city of Pulaski's law suits?

No one wants to answer that one, but sure can complain about Barrett not answering something.

Sunday, September 25, 2011 11:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:35
Regardless (and it is the city), the taxpayers will have to pay. Thank you, allen barrett.

Monday, September 26, 2011 6:46:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does the city not have a lawyer? Or do they just pay him/her when they have to use him/her?

Does court cost not have to be paid by the looser?

Monday, September 26, 2011 7:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regardless, the taxpayer foots the bill for the frivolous lawsuits. And that's not vitriolic hyperbole. Laugh.

Monday, September 26, 2011 8:02:00 AM  
Anonymous The Fleet Fox said...

Barretts problem is that he wants to be right so bad that he will sue the county even when he knows he is wrong. It is a terrible personality trait.

You also have to consider the amount of money that it is costing him for a lawyer. Einstein said that the definition of INSANITY is "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results". This should sound very familiar. He has caused the government and the citizens of Giles County problems for as long as I can remember and always gets the same results. That result is a loss.

Monday, September 26, 2011 8:43:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fleet
You are absolutely right, and it's just pathetic. Looks like someone close to him would tell him. But would he listen? I doubt it.

Monday, September 26, 2011 9:26:00 AM  
Anonymous The Fleet Fox said...

A man that is that full of himself will never listen to anyone. For some reason he thinks that he sits on a pedestal above all others, watching them like sheep. Anyone that picks up on his condescending and sarcastic way of speaking can see that he is only out to try and benefit himself.

Monday, September 26, 2011 10:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If this don't beat a hen a pecking. Barrett catches the devil for saying things about Mrs. Vanzant and some commissioners, but it's alright for you to say things about Barrett.

What will you do for pass time if this blog closes? So laughable.

Who's is stirring the pot today?
Go ahead a accusing me for taking up for Barrett. I'm just stating facts.

Monday, September 26, 2011 5:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:55 Seems you done jumped in the pot. Did someone mention Mrs. Vanzant or commissioners at 4:18?
Looks like 4:18 stated facts too.

Monday, September 26, 2011 6:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:55
Who is stirring the pot today? Well, I believe it's you friend.

Now, as for what you said about it being ok for people to say things about barrett and not ok for him to say things about Mrs. Vanzant and certain commissioners, I think you are quite confused. No, it is NOT ok for barrett to say nasty things about them. However, when he does, he will usually get a dose of his own medicine. That's what has been going on for a long time. He starts calling names and making accusations, and he gets it right back. Tit for tat perhaps?

4:18
Excellent post. Why wasn't he in church? I wonder.

Monday, September 26, 2011 6:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did i say it's ok for Barrett to say things about Mrs Vanzant and commissioners, NO. Just how you are doing the same thing he did.
Two wrongs does not make a right.

Has 4:18's post been removed? I can't find it.
The reason for saying Vanzant and commissioners is that usually who he attacks.

I've tried to find the post where Barrett made when he should of been in church. Found it 11:34 am Sunday.

Monday, September 26, 2011 8:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:34
5:55 said it.

Monday, September 26, 2011 10:50:00 PM  
Anonymous The Fleet Fox said...

Did a post get removed? If so, there needed to be an explanation of why. I didn't see anything that warranted deleting unless it was something about Barrett that he didn't like. Certainly nothing that hasn't been said by Barrett before. I noticed that he erased a post about Mrs. Flacy not too long ago for a post that was descriminating because if her age. Will he be consistent and do it again?

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Feet, I don't think a post has been removed lately, just someone making fun of someone posting wrong time.
I've noticed several post when the time would be wrong. It's easy not o see the time good, I just think they are old and need to have glasses checked.

I had noticed a post a few days ago that said post deleted and wondered what it had said. It must of been the one about Mrs. Flacy.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:25:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can tell what a low life wab is by the way he removed the 4:18 post, but not his own that had the same language.Have you heard the song,The Snakes Crawl At Night? Well there was one serpent crawling Sunday on its belly as usual.blowing poison from its weak sphincter muscles.Delete this one man of such great power.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:28:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

For those so interested in why I wasn't in church Sunday at 11:34.
This is the biggest problem with some of the gossips they think because they do something one way everyone else must be doing it exactly the same way. Well, first of all whether I'm in church or not in church on a certain day are at a certain time is between me and God and not the business of the gossips.
The second things is if you would spend a bit more time out from under your rock you would know that there are several churches in the county that start services much earlier than 11AM. So unless you were in the same church as I was how would you know whether I was there or not? Your assumptions are smeared all over your face.

To Fleet fox, It's interesting that you used Einstein's quote, "INSANITY is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results" since based on that Einstein was insane since he married three times.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:31:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Why would I delete the stupid ramblings of a gossip who hasn't been right about anything yet? Try harder even a stopped clock twice a day so you have something to strive for... being as right as a stopped clock.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fleet
The "man of God" hath spoken. What a laugh.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:59:00 AM  
Anonymous The Fleet Fox said...

Notice that he didn't say that he was at church. His typical question avoidance. He would have made a good politician in Washington.

FF

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

FF How funny. Have you ever noticed the times the one first called enabler ignored answering a question.
By any chance is that you?

Really who's business is it if WAB, you or me or vanzant went to church?

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who cares if he wasn't at chuch. At least we know that there was a lot of peaceful chuches on Sunday. I was not putting him down for not being in church,I was just making a comment about his way of talking to and about people continues 7 days a week, looks like he would take a day off from his slander.I'm sorry if it came out wrong. I still wonder why he deleted 4:18 Monday. It was no different from his 5:01 Sunday post. Has he fallen in the pot again?

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:22
The true enablers are those like you who support a troublemaker and keep something stirred up.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You asked the question about him not being in church now you deny it and complain that he didn't answer your question, what a loser you are.
Get an interpreter to tell you what "if you wasn't in the same church as I was in how would you know I wasn't there" then get them to explain to you that whether he was in church or not is just none of your dam business.

I still believe that Barrett posts less than the enabler who continually blows gossip through both nostrils and ears.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 4:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My computer doesn't ding every time someone makes a post. So I missed a post for 4:18, what did it say? I've always seen a message "post deleted" when a post was deleted and don't see one this time. What is the proof there ever was one?

Would someone say they made a post at 4:18 and what was so bad it would of been deleted.
My opinion is that's a lot of bull.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:02 I was hoping I would at least get you up to the edge of the pot. How could you know what was in 4:18 Monday post that was only up for a few hours unless you are someone that has access to them? Is that none of my damn business?.It is none of you damn business what I say either. I also admitted I made a mistake. You don't make them do you? Is this another snake in the grass or is this the same one that runs this site?

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is Enabler Jr.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The post 6:08 needs to be deleted.
Could that of been posted by the Christian gentleman?

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:50 I didn't read 5:55's post the way you did. Don't think he/she said it was alright for Barrett to say things about Vanzant or commissioners.

8:34
5:55 said it.

Monday, September 26, 2011 10:50:00 PM

He/she just showed you, you were doing the same thing.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If 6:08 needs to be deleted, then so does 4:02 and 8:41 needs to be deleted also.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:08 needs to be deleted because of language. I didn't see that in the two post you want removed. They must of stepped on your toes.

Temper seems to be flying.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:41 Was you wondering if the one wanting to be called Christian Gentleman had started cussing?

I'm sure you will hear a dam is a thing to hold water back. lol
If they are deleted WAB will say "This post has been deleted."

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey 11:08 Did you not see that the language in 4:02 PM is the same as 6:08 except that they did not know how to spell damn. 4:18PM Monday was deleted. Readers that saw it please let these idots know that it was there. How about wabs words of love on Sunday at 5:01 PM? Thanks

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the 4:18 post being referred to is on the previous topic on Sept 22. Must have posted on the wrong topic.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:13:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:11 I read the 5:01 post again and still don't know what you're talking about. I know your being sarcastic about the words of love but I didn't see anything unacceptable, hateful or out of order. There's just a couple of questions I assume were for you that you didn't answer.Be more specific and maybe we can tell what your complaint is.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:33:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this the post
that was suppose to have been deleted?
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He has called her a liar and other names. How can you enablers deny this? He even has a thread wherein he calls her the Great One. He hates her, and it is pathetic, particularly coming from one who claims to know Christ. Pathetic.

Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:18:00 PM

Well it's still there, better get new glasses. You can't even keep threads straight.
My opinion of this is WAB can't despise JV anymore than the first enabler does WAB.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:44
Here's the facts about the one you refer to as the first enabler. There was no first enabler, because barrett told that lie out of spite and anger, and the true enablers keep perpetuating it. Yes, he told a lie when he concocted that name.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Get it straight people ,it was a post at 4:18 Monday Sept.26 2011. Myeyes are fine it is your mouth that is the problem/

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I saw the post - 4:18PM Monday and suddenenly it blew away. How strange.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why didn't I see it. I think you posted it and didn't do it correct so it didn't stay.
Strange no one else saw it. Why can't you tell what it said?

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:57:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Don't know how many have been following the news about suspension of the Constitution by the federal government and the desire to suspend it by other officials.
The Obama has already suspended the Constitution by getting involved in the civil war in Libya without the consent of Congress. Now there are troops on the ground there and he plans another three months of military action there.
The Gov. of North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue (D) says she wants to suspend congressional elections for a few years so progressives can make greater inroads without being concerned with how voters feel?

Peter Orzag former Director of the Office of Management and Budget for the Obama administration wants less democracy in this country.
"To solve the serious problems facing our country, we need to minimize the harm from legislative inertia by relying more on automatic policies and depoliticized commissions for certain policy decisions. In other words, radical as it sounds, we need to counter the gridlock of our political institutions by making them a bit less democratic."

Without the Constitution and it's
enforcement we would soon have a dictatorship with liberals controlling every aspect of our lives. Just consider how much they already control from what we eat to how much water we flush with.

Friday, September 30, 2011 9:18:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home