Obama Plays The Race Card Again!
Imagine – just for an unimaginable moment – Rick Santorum launching a campaign initiative entitled “White People for Rick Santorum.” What would be the response from Barack Obama, Democrats across the country, the Obama Media Group (OMG), and your liberal friends? Unimaginably imaginable, isn’t it?
“RACISM!” That’s what. You know it. I know it. They know it. Obama’s sock puppets in the “mainstream” media would suffer a collective apoplectic seizure the likes of which has not been seen since liberal media sycophants turned their wrath on the audacious Monica Lewinsky for having the unmitigated gall to trap Bill Clinton into seducing her in the Oval Office. Yes, America, the cup of leftist hypocrisy would runneth over – big time.
Yet – O launches “African Americans for Obama” – replete with its own logo, (O loves logos), and marching orders for blacks – and there is nary a whimper from the OMG.
The clearly racist program urges blacks to volunteer their time by making calls, organizing events and going door-to-door in black neighborhoods encouraging blacks to vote for O.
Not only is Obama blatantly playing the race card in a segregated attempt to rally blacks into working and voting for him; he is also – once again – violating the separation between church and state. In the video promo for the campaign, Obama urges blacks to pressure black churches into supporting the Regime by spreading his message via “the faith community.” He also calls on black voters to become “congregation captains.”
Reprinted
posted by Allen Barrett | 10:25 AM
123 Comments:
Blacks need to start listening to people like Allen Keyes and realize how the Democrats dupe them for their votes. It's shameful.
And the support of pro-abortion and pro-gay candidates in ANY church should be condemned, regardless of that candidate's skin tone. But it's not.
Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Allen West, J.C. Watts, Star Parker...all great Black Americans that I would vote for in a heartbeat. And I am a white, Christian, Conservative male from Giles County, home of the KKK.
I would never vote for a candidate because of their race, nor would I vote against them because of it. It should always be about ideas and policy. Obama is a Socialist at best, a Communist at worst. I would never vote for someone with his ideology...no matter what his race.
Thanks Mr. Barrett for telling the truth about The king of do nothing people who are living off hard working taxpayers.
4:11
I too am a white Christian conservative who would also vote for any of these great black Americans. Skin tone shouldn't have anything to do with it, but the Obama camp has, in my opinion, not only played the class warfare card but the race card as well. It's just a shame that so many will blindly line up and vote for a man like that who will most likely go down in history as our worst president ever.
4:11
I am also a gentleman.
I don't care if he uses the race card. It just shows that they are the ones keeping racism alive. I think the white man let go of it all many years ago. I just laugh at the fact that it is all they have anymore. The truth is that most black people are content with being leaches.
Right 7:29 we don't owe the lazy black and whites that makes us pay for their candy and drugs. The race card needs to be removed from the deck and put these lazy buts to work!!!!! lets just burn the whole deck and be done with it.
On WkSR
Property tax due today or pay penetaly. Maybe the hospital fund want be dipped into for awhile.
The Sherriff's department is doing a good jobs with catching the drug people.
Waaaa, waaaaa. There are all sorts of special groups who pull together to work for their candidate. Irish Americans, Latinos, Jewish groups, LGBT, Women, etc. So why go fear-baiting about an African American group? Oh, and by the way, you don't need to specially label Santorum supporters as "Whites for Santorum." It is amply clear from looking at any of his rallies. This is a non-issue except among those who fear the black person.
Someone would have to be a fool to be scared of black people. They definitely aren't going to take any of our jobs. Even the mexicans think black people are lazy. I guess you should be real proud of that 3:27.
Does anybody want to argue that this blog is NOT a source for potential problems between races? We just do NOT need this kind of grief, and I am hoping that barrett will at least remove the 4:47 post.
I don't agree with 4:47's post but I've seen a lot of post that made me think they were drunk especially on week ends.
5:11 I would be glad to submit that this blog is not a source for potential trouble between the races anymore than a daily newspaper or tv news program. I would also submit that it is less a potential problem than an all black, all Spanish TV network.
Trying to hide problems has never been anything but a breeding ground for big and worse problems. Dr, Abernathy said, "Exposure is the greatest cure for racism". I believe that and it has been proven time and again. The content of a person's character not the color of their skin, said Dr. King, but today far too many seem more focused on color than character. Rep. Alan West is a man not because of his color but because of his character displayed in his discipline integrity. Pres. Obama is a childish thug not because of his color but because of his undisciplined dishonest character.
wab
I would argue that you are dead wrong about this blog. Justify what goes on here, but I see it as a very serious threat to peace and harmony here in Giles County. I just hope and pray that nothing bad happens as a result of some of the things said here. We don't need that kind of trouble.
The blog isn't wrong. It's the people without enough sense to post without showing their hate.
11:49 I would disagree with you. Just take a look at the thread topics. In my opinion, most of them are negative in nature and such that people's emotions are stirred to anger. That's not what the Bible means by provoking one another to love and good works, is it? It's just a shame.
5:34 So your emotions get stirred in anger. I would quit reading it then if I was you. No need to get upset.
6:21
Well, looks like you are at it again. Have you been on vacation? Why do you insist on stirring up needless trouble? Oh, I'm sorry. You were just trying to provoke unto love and good works. Right?
Did I say that MY emotions get stirred to anger? No. Go back and read my post again. I thought it was pretty easy to understand.
Sorry to disappoint you, but, in spite of the meanness that takes place on this blog, I find it interestng reading.
So 6:54 you ain't a people. I seen you get angry plenty times on here and call other people names and say bad things but you a good Christian gentleman I know cause you told everybody that you is.
I posted 6:21 not 7:24
You said gets PEOPLE stired up, so I wanted to know if youthat included you.
You have sounded stirred up a few times.
By the way I haven't been anywhere You just can't tell who post unless you've been checkin out google. I wonder if they will tell who all I search and post too.
7:30
What is your problem anyhow? You seem a bit stirred up...and confused.
I said these negative threads get people stirred up, and I incorrectly assumed that you understood what I was talking about. I think you do but would rather argue for the sake of argument.
Since you want to match wits with me again, let me tell you what stirs me up. Put simply, it's people like you who want to keep something stirred up. How's that for stirring people up?
Ok, I suppose it's now your turn again.
7:24 (7:30)
You're right. I am a Christian gentleman. Isn't that what barrett calls himself? Deal with that.
As I said above, it's now your turn. Having said that, please allow me to ask a question. Do you have an issue you want to discuss or do we resume this game?
Has any post on this thread discussed what the topic of the thread was?
You've all acted like children.
CG just has to post back to everyone. Must be afraid the thread will die if he don't.
In trying to figure out what is going on I've reread post and this must be it. "In my opinion, most of them are negative in nature and such that people's emotions are stirred to anger."
So that could be anybody's emotiones, right? Good grief if the shoe fits wear it, if not leave it alone.
9:26
Again, do you have an issue you would like to discuss?
8:24 I have never read where Mr. Barrett referred to himself as a Christian Gentleman only seen a couple of times where he referred to even being a Christian.I think you have become so hate filled and proud that you either can't separate truth from untruth or maybe you just don;t care about the truth. I think you don;t care about the truth when it gets in you way.
CG wants everyone else to stop stirring up trouble, but he can't see his post also stir up trouble.
6:56 (11:57)
Go ask him if he thinks himself a Christian gentleman. If he says yes, will you set in on him like you do me?
You talk of truth. I tell you the truth and you reject and make fun of me for it.
Why don't you stop trying to stir up trouble? That's all I have ever asked of you two or three who apparently thought you would go unchallenged for the mean and nasty things you say about others of your choosing. You love this, don't you?
People let's please contact our congressman about the contraception
bill. I can not and will not pay for a women to have sex when and with whoever she she wants to. And now Obamasadden is supporting her just to get the womens vote. She is saying she needs $3,000 a year for pills. Nobody pays for my aspirin caused by all these freeloaders out there. As Limbaugh said she really is a slut. I really hate to call her that,but what else is there to explain here actions? Wake up America, what is happening to our Christian values.
I don't mind paying for their birth control it helps keep their numbers in check .What i do mind paying for is their cell phones,feeding them,their drugs,their beer,tobacco,and lottery tickets.
My word, I am really impressed that a bunch of 2nd graders have such proficent typing skills. I haven't seen one blog on here that acutally stays on topic for more than three of four posts.Amazing. As for Mr.Barretts original editorial, show me a republican that does not try to spread his messgae via “the faith community.”
Yall are about as fair and balanced as fox news. Start signing your names, be proud, if you can, of your opinions.
Ray Lanier
Thanks for the excellent post. Good points.
Did anybody notice that the USA. is exporting 439,000 more barrels of oil in a day than we import. How can that be? We are getting to be more socialist with our current muslim leadership.
I guess it's time to once again re-state the simple fact that I do not pretend that my commentary is totally unbiased. All my life experiences have shaped me into whatever I am just as life experiences have shaped everyone else. There is no one who is totally unbiased. Opinions are the result of those biases and there is no way to totally separate oneself from all their life experiences, anyone who says they can just isn't being honest.
I try to report on events and actions in the main thread that allow everyone to make comments whether those comments are intelligent or stupid the hope is that they would at least be based in some sort of fact and the writer would present those facts in support of their comments. Unfortunately many make accusations and spread gossip with little or no concern for the truth or the available facts. Most of what is written on this blog I do not agree with or approve of, but do not feel it appropriate to censor others.
Thus I get blamed for those comments that are not fact based.
Some have even gone out of their way to personally attack me with the most vicious and libelous of charges all done under the cowardly cover of anonymous. The galling part of those attacks is that the one most consistent is the most hypocritical in accusing me of things he is most obviously involved in. Perhaps having a government job with nothing to do but write for the newspaper give privilege some certainly believe they deserve special privileges and claim them from every area of the government. I pity their blindness and arrogantly perverted attitude.
wab
FWhy can't you see that you are continuing to perfectly describe yourself when you personally attack others? Go look at the man in the mirror. That's right; it's you.
I thought he described CG.
Is that who you saw when you looked in the mirrow. A Christian that don't know smart or hateful remarks are not being a christian.
11:14
I think it described barrett. Oh, doesn't he claim to be a Christian as well?
I'm sure Mr. Barrett would describe himself as a Christian, but I don't see him on here every day making that claim or saying that because he is a Christian there is no way he could possibly support wrongdoing.
I'm a Christian and I know that I can support wrongdoing, I can even do wrong myself, I try not to. Being a Christian don't prevent you from doing anything it just helps you understand what's right and wrong and guide you to do right.
1:34 I was just thinking that. Glad you made the post.
1:34 (2:07)
Look, you continue to miss a simple point. The ONLY reason I ever said I am a Christian gentleman is because barrett wanted proof that I am not an enabler of wrong. He told that lie, and the only proof I could offer is that I, as a Christian, would never willfully go along with wrong. That doesn't mean I'm not a sinner; we all are. I never claimed to be perfect.
Having said that, I would suggest that you be fair about it and question wab's Christianity when he calls people nasty names and creates strife. Ok?
2:35 I haven't been a long time reader of this blog but I haven't yet seen where Mr. Barrett has called anyone a nasty name.
You wrote something that confused me when you stated that "The ONLY reason I ever said I am a Christian gentleman is because barrett wanted proof that I am not an enabler of wrong. He told that lie, and the only proof I could offer is that I, as a Christian, would never willfully go along with wrong".
If the "ONLY" proof you could give was that as a Christian you would never go along with wrongdoing" then you should be concerned.
I'm not trying to be hateful of annoying to you but there are many who call themselves Christians I think you may have even mentioned it before, who have no problem supporting abortions. In fact I have a friend who is a wonderful Christian has been for over forty years, very active in her church but she vote for democrats no matter what, I've even talked with her about the abortion issue and she just says that has nothing to do with being a democrat or church.
2:57
Then you have not been readiing this blog long at all if you have never seen barrett call people names.
Now, as for abortion, I just don't see how a Christian could vote for democratic candidates who are pro-abortion. Yes, we will be held accountable for that. And you are right; wearing the name of Christian doesn't necessarily make one a true follower of Christ.
3:13 After the way you responded on another thread to me I am a bit afraid to ask if you can see that simply calling oneself a Christian doesn't necessarily make oneself such I wonder why you can't see that your claim of simply being a Christian isn't really proof to anyone else that you do not enable wrong behavior. I hope this doesn't upset you like before if it does please accept my apology.
2:13 You sound like the bitter wife that's been married 30 years and want let her husband forget something he did when they first married.
Ever heard of forgive? A lot of people haven't read this blog from day one, like you.
2:35, how many times have we read all about you and your self rightous attitude. Don't you think we get tired of your bs? We all have your stupid story memorized by now. So please try to get on a show on tv. Your story would be ok for a while but people would soon get tired of you and you your poor pitiful story.
4:51 (5:53)
The fact that I am a Christian SHOULD BE enough proof that I would never go along with wrongdoings. You know as well as I do that it doesn't mean I think myself so perfect. If you choose not to believe me, that's fine. God will be my judge.
As for the term "enabler", I will tell you again that it is a lie allen barrett started on me. When I denied it, and he wanted proof, I offered up what I believed to be my best argument that I would NEVER willfully be a part of wrongdoings. He just called me that name because I disagreed with some of his views. It's just that simple. It was offensive.
You mention forgiveness. Who am I supposed to be forgiving?
6:47
Stop bringing it up and making my spiritual beliefs and issue, and I will never mention it again. Ok?
Is there really anything you want to discuss?
I thought the proof Barrett wanted was why Vanzant wasn't wrong.
As far as you saying you are a Christian or anything you want to say you are proves nothing.
Any anonymous on this blog can say they are anything they want to but that don't prove a thing.
Prove by saying what Barrett said was wrong.
As for forgiveness, maybe you need to forget things that Barrett said a long time ago and doesn't say now. But you have to drag up the past.
I think you proveked Barrett to saying some things. didn't you say Terry Harwell was proveked so you know that can happen.
I think the topic of this thread was Obama playing the race card. If you disagree with Obama why not say something about that. Or do you find it more fun to say things against WAB?
Your turn now.
if I say I'm handicapped can I park in the handicapped spaces or do I have to have a doctor say I'm handicapped and then get approval from the state?
If I say I'm a fireman can I ride in the fire truck and fight fires?
If I call myself a policeman can I arrest some bad guys?
If I call myself a Christian can I tell people that means I can't support wrongdoing?
6:44 &97:46)
I can't help but laugh at the way you take short breaks between posts. Hilarious.
If you want me to stop dragging up the past, why don't you stop bringing it up? You should know by now that I will always defend myself against cheap shots. I think you just delight in mischief.
You say I provoked barrett to say some things? Well, why can't you use that same line of reasoning when it comes to Terry Harwell.? Or do you just like to keep dragging that up?
As for Obama, I think he plays both the race card and the class warfare card as well.
Uh...I tyhink you need a handicapped permit to park in those handicapped parking spaces. If you choose to park there without a permit, I'm afraid your vehicle might get towed.
If you say you are a fireman, you can ride the fire truck if the fire department gives yoiu a job there. Otherwise, you are an unemployed fireman who cannot ride that truck.
If you say you are a policeman when you do not have the badge, you will be in serious trouble if you are caught trying to arrest people. I think that is called impersonating a police officer.
If you truly are a Christian, you will have no part in wrongdoings.
Isd there an issue you want to discuss or do we continue this circle game?
Hey smart man, I posted 6:44 and not the other one. More than one person don't like the way you pop off.
I haven't said anything bad about Terry Harwell. I said you said Terry Harwell was provoked to say what he did.
In my opinion every thread Barrett starts you pop off in a way that provokes him.
I know some think you are Dan Watson, I can't believe a sweet woman like his wife would never live with a man that acts like you.
So no one can convince me you are Dan W.
9:01
And more than one person (there are many) dislike what you guys are up to. Deal with that. I just happen to be among those who call you out on it.
Could it be that almost every thread barrett starts is negative to begin with? Review them and have the courage to accept the truth when you see it.
Could it be that Mrs. Watson loves her husband? Just because YOU have a problem with him doesn't mean everyone else does. Do you people ever tire of this drama?
9:26 Can you deal with anything?
You better read my post again it doesn't say I don't like Dan Watson. I don't know him but do know what a wonderful person his wife is, so how could he not be.
I'm sure she loves him.
Oh I don't mind agreeing that Barretts post are negative. But that' what it would be about if you don't agree.
I think your post are negative. Not against those in county government, but anyone that says anything against them. Do you ever tell why Barrett what WAB says is wrong. No you just get defensive at him. Makes you look like a little child.
You seem to like the drama are you would stop instigating it.
You can go to work now I want bother you anymore today as I have to leave for work now.
9:51
Are you insane? Of course you didn't say you did not like Mr. Watson. However, the implication was there that he is not a good person. You need to go back and read your own words. You say you can't believe a sweet woman like his wife could live with a man like that.
Oh, I believe your hero has been wrong about a number of things. However, it is also my belief that he never admits to being wrong, so it's a moot point. There's an old saying that you should never argue with someone who thinks he knows more than you do to begin with.
You say I instigate drama? Wrong again. I just don't let you guys get away with starting it. That's PRECISELY the problem you have with me
I'm sorry you have to go to work now. But, as another old saying goes, tis better you than me.
Funny how everyone sees things different. I went back and read 9:01's post. I thought he/she meant when they said that it was the one called Christian Gentleman.
I didn't take it it meant Dan Watson. Oh well have it your way not my pissing contest.
A few years ago I was talking with someone and this man came up and joined in. He said something about he liked to disagree with people. I said, "You must be one that post on the Free Speech blog." He turned red and had to go. At that time a lot of post ended with "laughable". Strange after he passed away I never saw a post ending that way again.
Wasn't long before someone took his place.
1:26
I'm the one you guys like to criticize for claiming to be a follower of Christ. I take that as a compliment.
I didn't post 9:01.
Let me see, the claim made by CG is that every thread I post is negative. According to the Christian Gentleman who I'm sure would never lie because he is a Christian, not a single post has been posted by me that was not a negative post.
I would remind CG, that just as he has been wrong so many time before in his zeal to criticize me he is once again just plain wrong.
I posted a wish for everyone to have a Merry Christmas back in December, To the amazement of most posters the very first response was a very negative comment from good ole CG.
I even posted a topic with absolutely nothing on it and the very first comment was negative from from CG.
Now should anyone doubt the accuracy of this post you can simply go back and see for yourself who is being truthful here and just who is the negative person.
4:05 I don't understand your post. Are you saying you are Dan Watson. That is the only person I saw that might get a compliment in the post of 1:26.
wab
Wrong once again. I never said that ALL of your posts are negative in nature. I believe you will find that I said almost all of them are negative. There's a huge difference between the words all and almost. I'm sure you do not want to appear to be bearing falsehoods, so I would suggest that you revisit my post and admit that you were wrong.
You criticize my being a Christian gentleman, and that's fine. Trust me; it's a wonderful thing to be. And neither you nor anyone else I know here on earth is my judge. Thank God.
wab
I forgot to ask you a burning question. Do you consider yourself a Christian gentleman? If you do, what's wrong with proclaiming it and telling others?
Rejoice, and again I say rejoice.
I think Barrett is lucky he can walk around town without someone busting his mouth. Maybe it is because he is old and everyone sees him for the idiot that he has made of himself?
9:16 I know WAB and he ain't hiding
so anytime you feel like busting him go ahead, I know with his past experiences even at his age he could send you to the hospital.
My suggestion to you is stay anonymous and only shoot your mouth off with your hands in your pocket.
Well 10:34 you just made my day with that joke of a speech. Don't be stupid.
I appreciate the effort of 10:34 but I consider their comment unnecessary and potentially volatile and not reflective of my own thoughts or actions. I would add that I have not become a recluse due to any fear of cowardly posters who only make personal attacks from the safety of their anonymous closet.
wab
Do you or do you not consider yourself a Christian gentleman? If you do, why is it wrong to proclaim it? Why is claiming Christ not a good answer to a man who accuses you of an evil deed? Please explain.
One of the cheerleaders got a nice reprimand this morning. Too funny! Your feelings will stop hurting in a little bit 10:34.
To 8:02 Whether I am a Christian or not is not a topic on this blog nor is it an issue of debate by me. My actions prove what I am to those who are open minded enough and spiritually mature enough to see honestly. I will say I have never hidden behind religion to justify anything I could not prove with other evidences.
As for being a gentleman I have no formal training in such. There was little opportunity in the housing project or in the military to practice the art of "gentlemanly characteristics", instead I developed a character forged by integrity. Perhaps you should consider becoming less of a gentleman and more a man of integrity with a dependable character.
Good one WAB.
wab
Then tell your one or two buddies to stop making fun of my Christianity. My spiritual life should not be a topic as well.
My actions show that I am a follower of Christ. It's a good thing.
You developed a character forged by integrity? Oh please.
Lastly, you need no formal trianing to know how to treat other people right. Yopu should have learned that at home.
You don't show you are a christian on this blog. You may in life to the people that know you.
I don't think Jesus would approve of some things you post. I think he wouldmthink "why didn't you just ignore that."
You think you are challengeing the people but does it do any good? No you just make it worse.
My preacher preaching on holding a grudge as wrong.
11:22
Wrong. I am not on here calling people names and making all kinds of accusations. I seek to get it stopped. Your are right; It probably does no good, but I can at least try. This troublemaking needs to stop.
11:45 I hate to tell you this but you just make it worse.
How about taking a new approach stay off the blog for a week and see if all post don't stop. Are you welling to do that?
If I was a betting man I would bet the farm you want do that.
I know it is a sore subject but some of the spelling on here is terrible, even on simple words. Get out a dictionary folks.
CG you are the only one who made your religion a issue and ain't nobody made fun of that only your stupid claim that it makes you imune to supporting bad.
If you ain't on here calling people names and making all kinds of accusations what in the world do you conside calling Mr Barrett a liar and a bunch of other thing and telling people they should leave their homes and how they don't act to suit you. You are the worse one on here for calling people names and mnaking accusations without no proof.
4:59
Wrong. I only made it an issue because barrett wanted proof that I don't willfully go along with wrongdoings. My proof didn't satisfy him and his one or two cheerleaders, yourself being one of them. I really don't have to prove anything to you guys anyhow. There's only One who will judge me.
As for calling names, I only called barrett a liar because he told a lie on me and refuses to admit that he was wrong. Look, if you guys will stop bringing this up, you can rest assured that I will not mention my beliefs again. I am prepared to let it go, but you just can't stop. As one of you so eloquently stated, I would almost bet the farm that you can't refrain from it.
Other than pointing out that lie, who have I called a name or made false accusations about?
4
:59
I forgot to ask you again. Is there anything you really want to discuss, or do we continue this circle game?
Too bad the one wanted to bet his farm if he was a betting man didn't bet. Hell will freeze over begore CG quits making his great post.
I sure hope CG wasn't the one said something about the spelling on this blog. I've seen several things on his post which I thought was accident by hitting wrong key.
That is so easy to do and everybody aren't good typist.
One thing about it is people are doing good with the two words they are to type or their post wouldn't save.
6:00 PM. d0 you know the old redneck way to describe you? if you bark like a dog,act like a dog, and sleep with dogs you will soon be one. here is another way to describe you,is it better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you are stupid or open it and prove it? we have heard you tell the same story about yourself for so like you sound like your words are coming from somewhere besides your mouth. please let it go for a while, we are sick of your lies about yourself. if you are a Christian gentleman or women act like one.
6:20 (7:53)
Why don't you answer my questions at 6:00? I am a Christian gentleman. Oh, how that must anger you. Stop making my Christianity an issue, and I will no longer have to defend myself.
No, it was not me who pointed out grammatical errors or typos.
You falsely accuse me of telling lies about myself. I told you the truth, and you can't accept it. That's unfortunate.
I'm 6:20 and never said CG called anyone a name. My opinion of CG is he watches what he say so he hopes want get in trouble.
I just think the blog would die if he didn't make people mad. I'm just hoping things can be discussed in a nice way. Everyone stop with the hatefulness.
I've notice Ray L copies CG's way of not capitalizing Barretts name and that made me wonder if the same person. I feel sure you both dislike him so much you think that demeans Barrett. It really looks like you skipped a course in school. That's the only way I know who CG is, so RL please don't do that. You help by given us a name whether it is your real name isn't important to me.
8:49
I don't capitalize his name because I have no respect for him. And I have no idea who Ray is, but I'm fairly certaion that he will be called every name in the book that I've been called simply because he diagrees with what these people are doing. Isn't that the heart and soul of free speech top have our own opinions and views?
Of course I watch what I say on here. It's not my nature to be calling people names and making accusations against them.
There is a lot of people I have no respect for, but will not make my self look bad by not capitalizing their name when writing it. I don't think Jesus would approve of me doing that.
I think Jesus would totally approve if you were trying to get that person to reflect upon his life and to ask himself why he is disrespecfted. That principle is clearly taught in the Word of God.
But what you believe is between you and God. That I do respect.
Hey 8:49, I don't give a rats ass if you approve,don't approve, capitilize, don't capitilize, or don't even believe I'm who I say I am. I don't hit the shift key unless I see reason for it. Post your name and we'll compare gpa's. I bet mine's bigger than yours.
Ray,
These are the people who think they have all the answers and nobody wants to hear them.
I'm glad they don't intimidate you. Don't let them run you off.
I don't think they anticipated that anyone would stand up to them.
12:43 Is the post that needs to be deleted because of one word in it.
6:32, thanks for the vote of confidence, i think it's only the second one i ever got.
7:31, are you kidding me? Have you read any of the post on this forum?People are saying lots worse things on here than "ass". I mean, I'm just guessing that was the one.Anyways, I just gotta be me.Peace
The question remains. Would barrett have deleted a post that suggested he was or had ever dated a man?
3:04 That was post never should of been made about you and Ray, just like Terry Harwell never should of called a man a faggot in front of people at the chilli cook off. Harwell's comment is on video for everyone to see and the post about you is there for anyone reading the blog to see.
4:01
The question remains. Why didn't barrett delete such an inflammatory post? Can you explain that?
10:03
Why did Terry Harrwell say what he did at the chilli cook off?
You sound just like you did about the signs. laughable
I think if it had been said about Mr. Barrett he would have considered the source and ignored it. 3:04 why can't you?
To 10:03 I didn't delete the comment you refer to because I didn't choose too. Now, why did I choose not to delete it? Because I judged it no more inflammatory, no more obnoxious than most other comments. If I were to start deleting eveything that someone found offensive, obnoxious or inflammatory what would be left? Clearly as simple a statement as "Merry Christmas" is upsetting to some. My Granny couldn't bring herself to read some of the words in the Bible to us kids because they were considered "no no's"
While I try to monitor the blog for prohibited obscenities I will not censor it because I may disagree with the comment or find it personally objectionable.
I wish beyond hope that everyone would stay on topic and present their points with clarity and factual support but since I don't have a magic lamp and firmly believe in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution I must accept the fact that if we are to have a "free speech" forum we must protect that right, by not being censors.
If the comments are overly objectionable I suggest that you don't read them. No one will come to your house and force you to open the blog and read every word.
wab
Would it have been inflammatory enough had it been about you and one of your male buddies? Shame on you again.
9:26 So you and Mr. Lanier are buddies? Lots of people have buddies, nothing wrong with that. I would hate to know my buddie and I couldn't go fishing together.
Just meaning you do know who Mr. Lanier is? I have no idea who he is. that maybe be his name and that maynot.
Do you know what the topic of this blog was?
11:52
You know what? You are loooking pretty stupid right now. Do you not recall that the post was made wherein Ray Lanier was asked if he had dated Christian gentleman and which one was the he and which was the she? How convenient of you to feign stupidity.
Look whose talking about anyone looking stupid.
When is Terry going to apoligze?
When is Hughes going to apologize? When will barrett apologize for all the name-calling he has done? When will you stop whining and bellyaching?
Is there an issue you would like to discuss? I doubt it.
When have you ever dissussed an issue on this blog?
Hughes don't owe terry an apoligzie. Barrett don't owe you one either. Get over yourself. You don't rule Giles County.
Give it up cg. I will come back at you and my post are no stupider than yours.
I think Barrett has been called much worse, much by you than what was said about you and Lanier. I think you are the only one who actually thought it was true, you seem preoccupied with sexual things so I guess it would bother you more than most. Anyway I got to pick up George and head for the poker table.
7:14 (7:32)
You are so ridiculous. Yes, I think Mr. Hughes owes the Harwells an apology, and I am certain that barrett owes me one for the lie he told about me. However, I'll never get it, but that's fine. I was perfectly content to just let it go, but those one or maybe two at the most like you keep bringing it up. I would suggest that YOU give it up. You ought to know by now that I won't let you get away with it.
For your information, I don't even know Mr. Lanier, and I can certainly attest to the fact that I have never dated a man. Nor do I have any desire to do so.
You seem to be the one with the sexual hang-ups. Were I a betting man, I would guess that you are the one who started this whole mess about Mr. Lanier and me. It was pure filth and slander, and barrett wouldn't delete it from this blog. Shame on the both of you.
Is stupider a word?
Do you have anything you want to discuss?
8:03 When will you discuss the issues?
Hate to disappoint you but I didn't say that about you and Mr. Lanier.
You've never mistyped have you?
So perfect, watching over Giles County Officials and making people so mad they are talking about them. When it's cg they disrepect.
I bet people are posting to you that don't know are care what is going on in county government. Just read the blog and found cg.
I see you've been busy today.
You better go take a drink of kool-aid before you have a stroke.
I'll have to say I've never read of another one like you. You know if you stopped this blog wouldn't have much on it. Guess you like the attention.
8:03 "Is stupider a word?" Of course it is, i looked it up in the dictionary and there was a picture of you, I still couldn't recognize who you are because your head was still up your kazooty.
4:39
I knew you would look it up. While you were at it, you should have looked up the word "troublemaker". You would have found your picture. What a scream you are.
Do you want to discuss vocabulary now?
Why would anyone try to discuss vocabulary with an illiterate jerk who is proud of their stupidity 6:08
6:08 Thanks for the help. I know cg thinks I posted that. What a hoot he is.
I noticed on another thread this posting isn't the christian thing to do.
So I guess if we keep this up we will meet in hell one day.
I don't want to meet that fruitcake so this is my last post.
9:00 (9:10)
We certainly wouldn't want to discuss grammar, would we? You stated "an illiterate jerk who is proud of THEIR stupidity". Their would not be correct for that sentence. I don't think you should be talking about someone else's stupidity.
I posted 6:08. You really should take longer breaks between your posts.
CG
9:06
If you are going to complain about someone's grammar and try to embarrass them you should first make certain that you know what you are talking about.
The sentence you criticized, "Why would anyone try to discuss vocabulary with an illiterate jerk who is proud of their stupidity?" is a very sound one.
The word "their" is the possessive form of the pronoun "they" and is used as an adjective to modify the noun that follows it.
On the other hand the word "there" is an adverb that is used to indicate a place or location.
If you are going to act like the smartest person in the room you should make sure no one else is in that room.
8:49 I would disagree with your analysis of that sentence. When the writer said "with an illiterate jerk who is proud of their stupidity", the reference was intended for the illiterate jerk (his or her own stupidity). However, if the jerk was referencing someone else's stupidity, you would be right. But I do not think that was the case. Perhaps the one who posted that statement should have reworded it for clarity.
Thism is so asinine. Why don't you take a survey and report the results as to how people viewed the comment?
I read the sentence and it made perfect sense to me. You left off half the question which when taken as a whole was perfectly clear for informal communication. A person who is proud of their stupidity isn't worth talking with.
Is this a very christian thing to say?
"Why would anyone try to discuss vocabulary with an illiterate jerk who is proud of their stupidity?"
9:20
You are right. I don't believe a true Christian would be guilty of such nastiness. Whoever made that remark should think about that. I also do not believe Christian people should be involved in name-calling and troublemaking.
Yes, God is watching, and we will all have to give account someday.
CG
CG the main violator has spoken and his hypocrisy grows with each pound of his bull.
Would not liking poor people or the ones drawing Social Security fit under the Race Card?
9:15
Well, here youa re again spewing your usual venom at me. Do you ever get tired of attacking me? Does it bother you that there are those who actually follow Christ?
Do you think Christians should be involved in name-calling and troublemaking? I don't.
Is there anything you want to discuss...besides me?
Exactly 3:40 so why don't you stop.
Would true Christians be posting on any blog?
9:38 Would true Christians be involved in troublemaking and name-calling? NO!
Everyone that post on here don't call names
You also are a trouble maker. Not on the county government. But others.
What about the governor did you not say something about him and Summerville? I've told them about this blog.
They know how to except critizen not like you and janet.
2:45
Wrong again. I did voice my disapproval of Haslam and Somerville just like I do about Obama.All three of these guys need to go, and I believe they will. You told Haslam and Somerville about this blog? I'll bet they had a laugh out of you.
I wonder if they are upset about what cg posted or if they are man enough to ignore it. Too bad cg can't do that.
I'm glad someone told them about this blog.
You might be surpise who could be reading this blog. Think before posting.
8:03 (9:48)
Let me say it again. I will do everything in my power to see Haslam, Somerville, and Obama defeated. I hope they do read this. I have said nothing wrong, and STILL have a right to my opinions.
Forward a copy of this post to each one of them. Go ahead.
9:48
I believe there will be big trouble one of these days because of this blog, so I am careful about everything I post on here. I preface what I say by saying such things as "in my opinion", "I believe", and etc.
It is "my opinion" that there have already been some things said on here that would cause very serious problems had the one who posted been found out. And that person coulod be found out simply by a slip of the tongue to a friend, etc. This is very dangerous, and I am not convinced that the blogmaster would not be held accountable for what goes on here. After all, he has the power to delete controversial and nasty posts.
7:48. Yes it is your right to say what you think about Haslam, Obama and Summerville just like it is anyony's right to say anything they want about Mrs. Garner, Mrs. Vanzant and any Commissioner.
My oipion is this blog is free speech so everyone go for it.
Post a Comment
<< Home