Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Will We Really Have $40,000.00 Custodians

This is the payroll for current custodial staff members at the courthouse. This was handed out at the budget meeting this morning Wednesday 28 November.

1. Roger Strickland $32,,448.00 per year

2. Missouri Holman $26,208.00 per year

3. Chris Judkins $20,387.00 per year

Payroll Per Hour For Hours Worked

1. Roger Strickland $1,248.00 for two weeks 100 hours = $12.48 per hour

2. Missouri Holman $1,008.00 for two weeks 70 hours = $14.40 per hour

3. Chris Judkins $784.00 for two weeks 70 hours = $11.20 per hour

PROPOSAL FOR NEW PAY SCHEDULE

Promote Roger Strickland to maintenance supervisor over both Courthouse and Annex Bldgs.

Increase salary from $32,448 to $40,448 per year an increase of $8,000.00.

This is, word for word, the statement at the bottom of the proposal :

Ladies and gentlemen:

If we hire a part time person at $8.50 per hr. That will be $8,840 per yr. $8,840+$8,000=$16,840 Per yr. We don’t have to pay extra insurance and full time benefits. Since we have help that is flexible, and willing to help out in both bldgs we need to keep good help.

SUGGESTION: Keep $25,000 in this budget. We will have $8,160 to adjust hrs. or pay scale if we have to.

In this same proposal is a list of changes and new responsibilities:

1. Hire part time person to work 4 hrs per day.

2. After talking to Mr. Wilburn at the bank he has assured me that the bank will be open at 7:00 a.m. every morning.

3. Start this person at 7:00 a.m.

4. Vacuuming and most cleaning should be done by 8:a.m. (Bank Opening Time).

5. Mr. Wilburn has assured me, it will not be a problem if we have to do a little cleaning after 8:00 a.m.

6. The two cleaning ladies and myself have talked and agree we think this will work.

7. After working with the Heads Of Depts at the courthouse I can’t see this as a impossible task.

8. I, Roger Strickland, do believe I can perform general maintenance duties at both buildings with very few problems.

One question I have is if there is a need for someone to be at the Annex for only four hours a day why can’t one of the current workers be assigned there then work four hours at the courthouse? Presently both custodians are working 35 hours per week, this could be increased to a full 40 hour work week. Mr. Strickland could adjust his schedule to 40 hours a week and oversee and take part in work at both buildings. Allen Barrett

60 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why not uncomplicate things & tell all of them we will pay them $50,000 @ $8 per hour plus fica phooey & pseuy. Whatever they don't get now will be deferred till later. Maybe we could have Jackson draw up a contract & explain it to them, if we promise to shoot a little his way. Maybe the spear might help point things out.

Wednesday, December 05, 2007 8:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's got to be a mistake in these numbers that's more than many teachers make. It raises the question just how much are other people in the courthouse making?

Thursday, December 06, 2007 2:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Barrett, wouldn't Roger Strickland's hours also be 35 each week and the other hours overtime or comp time, which would then have him making much more per hour than you figured.

Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has anyone checked to see how the bank has handled janitor work for many years ? Rumor has it they employed a part-time service twice a week . Suddenly, with all those dirty grubby commissioners and county employees dragging in SO much MORE dirt than three-times as many bank employees and customers the County needs a full time (obviously VERY s l o w ) cleaner ??
It must be "Relative hiring Time " again .......or an old school friend to lean on a broom .
Chickenlips

Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous of 6 Dec 7:45 post.
Those were not my numbers. I posted word for word what Mr. Strickland passed out to the budget committee.
Mr. Strickland reports working 100 hours per week and based on that number his hourly pay is reduced significantly. I have nothing to indicate if he is actually working that many hours per week but the thought that he is working over fourteen hours everyday of the week seems a bit incredible. If true his supervisor has some explaining to do as there are possibly several federal and state laws being violated. Allen Barrett

Thursday, December 06, 2007 10:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab..
Don't you ever get tired of exposing your posterior? Can't you find anything to your liking around here?
By the way (and for your information) you can stop suggesting that Judy Roberts is being paid by the county. As I told you before, she was only helping out during the transition period and has not worked at the courthouse in quite awhile. So enough with that already!

Friday, December 07, 2007 10:18:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous of the 7 Dec 10:18 post.
There are many, many things that I like even love around here. Of all the places I have lived since my birth this is the only place I chose.
I've tried, obviously unsuccessfully, to explain that simply because a person sees some problems and seeks correction for them does not mean that person can not appreciate the hundreds of other things that are mostly right. Correcting the problems would benefit all of the community and add to the good not subtract from them. It's sort of like if you have a broken arm, that part of your body needs some extra and immediate attention. Repairing that broken arm doesn't prevent your legs from working it only makes the whole body better.
By the way it was Mrs Vanzant that referred to Mrs Roberts as a consultant for the county. I simply have asked if she is a paid consultant and have not gotten a "NO" answer from the County Executive or County Commission. You are right about her not working at the courthouse lately but you might want to check the number of times she's been at the courthouse annex.
How long should a transition period be? Allen Barrett

Friday, December 07, 2007 10:48:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're right about almost everything except fixing a broke arm isn't the same as a group lobotomy.

Friday, December 07, 2007 8:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab..
Why is it any of your business how long the transition is? Why don't you launch a longitudinal study into training periods required on various jobs around the county? We look forward to your "exclusive" report. Chuckles.
I honestly don't think people like you are happy unless they are trying to stir up trouble or to embarrass someone else. Why is that? Paranoia and distrust for mankind has to have roots somewhere. And please don't bother blaming yours on the low-life county officials.

Monday, December 10, 2007 12:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab..
Why is it any of your business how long the transition is? Why don't you launch a longitudinal study into training periods required on various jobs around the county? We look forward to your "exclusive" report. Chuckles.
I honestly don't think people like you are happy unless they are trying to stir up trouble or to embarrass someone else. Why is that? Paranoia and distrust for mankind has to have roots somewhere. And please don't bother blaming yours on the low-life county officials.

Monday, December 10, 2007 12:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous of the 10 Dec 12:51 post. Anonymous why isn’t it my business how long the transition is? As an American citizen I have a responsibility to take an active part in the personal activities of my nation, I thought all citizens shared in that responsibility. As a taxpayer I have the responsibility to be involved in how that tax money is spent, I thought all taxpayers were responsible for such over sight.
I am amazed that you finally identified yourself as more than anonymous maybe someday you’ll be willing to take full responsibility for your irrational hate filled comments.
I paraphrase your comment, “I honestly don't think people like you are happy unless they are trying to” put other people down for acting on their convictions.
If there is embarrassment I would suggest that it is the result of that person’s own actions or words. What I have sought to do is simply expose the willful wrongdoings by those in positions of authority in order to help stop wasteful spending, stupid decisions, and abusive practices and keep other peoples hands out of my pockets.
“You ask why is that?” and ascribe it to “paranoia and distrust of mankind”. So, “why that is”, is because I try to live my life by a certain set of principles and those deep rooted principles dictate responsibility and involvement among other things. You should try it sometimes, you’d be amazed at how good being responsible will make you feel. Allen Barrett

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab..
Please don't bother telling me what a great American you are ....that bastion of hope and strength for the oppressed. I think you have been telling yourself that for so long that you now actually believe it. That is called delusion. Further, the fact remains that people like you tend to delight in stirring something up or attempting to hurt and embarrass someone and then attribute that to being involved and responsible. Garbage!
And, while you're at it, please don't bother suggesting that I try some of those finer qualities you see in yourself. I am NOT impressed. How dare you to say I am irresponsible when many of the things you are doing are totally irresponsible. Again, garbage!

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 11:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like wab done stirred up anoymous. Way to go wab you da man.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
Excuse me, but what you said sounds like someone who can't see the nose on the end of his or her face. How can you be so gullible?

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I checked the mirror and my nose is still their. As far as being gullible is I might have used your name anonymous but I didn't take your character. Seems like today just ain't your day.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If WAB really care about getting things done, if he really cared about making a differenc, if he really cared about being responsible, then he would try a different approach. He gets nothing accomplished acting like he does. Currently, he really is a laughingstock.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12-11, 6:16 pm
If you think WAB gets nothing done, think again! Haven't you noticed that whenever WAB points out something is not being done correctly, within a couple of weeks the procedures get corrected? I'd say Mr WAB is doing a great job. Keep it up Buddy.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

asadly, he and his devoted disciples cannot see it. He truly is a joke and a laughingstock.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 7:12:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey anonymous Dumbo did you notice the city decided not to paint the cemetery fence after wab started asking questions? He's da man and you just can't stand it. The joke is on you.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:36:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
You have been on here calling people dumbo for quite awhile. Do you think it makes you look witty or intelligent to call people names? Do you think it makes wab think more of you? Hilarious.
No, what I find so hard to stand (tolerate) is the egotistical and know-it-all attitudes of those you presume to be champions of the truth, justice, and the American Way. That is truly outrageous, and neither you nor I can afford to be so gullible.
By the way, I don't call you dumb like you do me, although I do wonder why you can't seem to tell the difference between a spiteful troublemaker and a person of care and compassion.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 2:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey dumbo anonymous I haven't called anyone dumbo or stupid but you and that's only because of the things you write. I think wab is doing a great job and I admire his efforts and courage but could care less about what he thinks of what I write. Personally, from what I've heard about him I imagine he's not letting what's written on here change him one way or the other.
I'll make the same statement you made to me, "I do wonder why you can't seem to tell the difference between a spiteful troublemaker and a person of care and compassion".
The answer for you is you've let your personal dislike for wab shadow your good reasoning.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
How small-minded can you be? Just because I don't see your hero in the same light that you do makes me a dumbo? I see him as a whining troublemaker who just can't get past his ego and who is so angry and resentful that he doesn't have the power he craves. By the way, that smacks of small-mindedness as well.
Please stop implying that I hate someone I have never met. My problem with the "Great One" is with his arrogance and egotism. I've said that many times. Sadly, if he could dig up any dirt on me, he would gladly "expose" me in a public way. Please tell me how that relates to Christianity? I'll be anxiously awaiting your response.

Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:16:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous, I’m not the one who called you dumbo but I can see part of his point.
You speak of small-mindedness but when you read some of your comments and your unwillingness to give reasons to support those thoughts even you must reconsider your openness to things outside your own mind. You see it’s not about you seeing someone differently than another does, it’s that you make those statements about someone, you admit not knowing or having even met, and offer nothing to support those statements. You speak of arrogance and egotism but give no examples where those things have been displayed. I have known WAB a long time and have seen him in many different situations and under various circumstances and never have I seen any thing but a kind, caring, humble person. Yes, he has some very strong held opinions that I have seen him defend vigorously but even those he has offered to change if given evidence they are wrong. Yes, he has a confidence and a raw edge that served him well as a soldier but is somewhat intimidating to civilians; old habits are hard to break.
I have not seen nor read on this blog where he has tried to destroy or embarrass anyone on a personal level as you have claimed. He certainly has done his part in exposing the behavior of some that proved to be very embarrassing but it was their doing that was embarrassing. I think you are being somewhat paranoid of guilt ridden to think WAB would try and “dig up dirt” on you just because you disagree with him. I would suggest you call him sometimes, you can block your number and name from caller ID, and you might just come away with a different idea simply by exposing yourself to something other than your pre-formed biased ideas.

Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1044 you don't understand - dumbo could remember one thing for a thousand years. He was imprinted with a picture of a rat when born, cause that's that they thought he was... Unfortunately, he grew up to be one & therefore thinks everything else is one two - also learned to count too, to two.

Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous....
You see wab as an humble person? Oh come on; you are kidding right? You also state that he has never tried to hurt or embarrass anyone. Have you not been reading this blog or what? I've seen statements on here where he has "suggested" things about county officials that I would not tolerate one bit. And I suppose you haven't read where he called certain officials anything from liars to crooks.
No, I have never met the man and don't want to. But I don't have to meet someone like Fidel Castro to know I don't like what he does. Would you agree with that.
And I am certainly NO dumbo just because I disagree with tactics of personal destruction used in a public forum such as this one. But one thing is for certain; I will continue to point this out anytime this is done. We both know it's not right, don't we?

Friday, December 14, 2007 7:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous,I stated, "I have not seen nor read on this blog where he has tried to destroy or embarrass anyone on a personal level as you have claimed. He certainly has done his part in exposing the behavior of some that proved to be very embarrassing but it was their doing that was embarrassing." To this you replied from out in "left" field that, "You also state that he has never tried to hurt or embarrass anyone. Have you not been reading this blog or what?" It's this kind of thing that has caused some to refer to you as "Dumbo". It's not because you are stupid but because you have allowed your prejudice to blind you to facts that are right before your face and instead of attacking the facts like an intelligent adult you choose to attack the writer and that is what makes you appear to be stupid.

Friday, December 14, 2007 10:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
Please go back and read my post again. I will concede that my prejudice is strong toward arrogant and self-righteous know-it-alls who have no problem talking about prople they dislike or resent. As Forrest Gump said, 'that's all I've got to say about that.'
You can call me dumbo if you wish, but I will never sit still and not speak out when someone is being attacked out of jealousy and hatred. And you have the gall to suggest that I post out of hatred. What a laugh that was!

Monday, December 17, 2007 2:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Talk about people who do bad things isn't the same as talking bad about good people who are not doing bad things.

The bad things and people who CONTINUE to do bad things have been documented and identified by a person who does show his face and be accountable for what he is saying.

There are laws and guarantees against privacy & secrecy in acts by public officials or employees, other than national security and certain law enforcement situations. Public officials are accountable to the citizens - a fact of law and Constitution! Get used to it or move to Cuba.

If WAB calls someone a liar, he does give a reason that fits the definition of the word used! You respond to specifics with terms like arrogant, know it all, etc., simply because you wallow in a gutter, have nothing to contribute, and don't have the guts to crawl out.

Agreed, Dumbo isn't really nice, but it seems to be the only word you recognize ...

Monday, December 17, 2007 8:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Dumbo, I'm still waiting for your list of contributions to be posted. I put up mine where are yours?
I have to wonder if you read and understand some of the things you write. I had to laugh out loud when I read these two contradictory statements you wrote, one directly after the other. You said, “I will concede that my prejudice is strong” then you say you, “will never sit still and not speak out when someone is being attacked out of jealousy and hatred”. A dead man already embalmed could see the contradiction in those two statements. What in the world do you think prejudice is when it’s allowed to go unconstrained but the irrational emotion of hatred without justification?
What do you think is driving your unfounded attacks against WAB, prejudice goes hand in hand with jealousy and hatred. I thought you were just unwilling to see the truth right before you but it’s much worse than that, you have allowed your prejudice to turn you into a pathetic little person, swelled up with all the poison your prejudice can grow. I feel very sorry for you

Monday, December 17, 2007 11:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous...
As I said in the above post, my problem is with a dislike for ANY arrogant and egotistical individuals, And that is precisely how I see your hero. Therefore, my "unfounded" opinions of him grow out of my distaste for people like that. And I am "dumbo" because I don't worship at his throne like you apparently do? I see him as a troublemaker and a person who is filled with hatred and jealousy, primarily because he lost an election last year. And, in all kindness, he is a laughing stock to those outside your little circle of comrades.
Please don't feel sorry for me. I am doiong just fine, and I not only approve this message but the one above as well. I will continue to stand opposed to mean-spirited people, regardless of who they are! Isn't that my right to disagree?

Friday, December 21, 2007 8:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

dumbo
Look in the mirror, move the proboscus to the right. Move it to the left. Back up to the mirror. Put your head between your legs. extend proboscus through legs & wave it in the mirror. plug proboscus into hole at top. you are now the ultimate recycling machine & Al Gore will nominate you for the next Noble Piece Pryze. You are everything you perceive.

Friday, December 21, 2007 12:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So typical of you liberals to resort to name-calling when someone challenges you. And you continue to call me dumbo? Ridiculous.

Friday, December 21, 2007 1:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
Let me ask you a question. Instead of saying Merry Christmas, would you prefer to be politically correct and say happy holidays? So many have become cowardly in that regard, and I just wondered how you stood on that.

Friday, December 21, 2007 2:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is the use of having a holiday if the main subject of that holiday is not permitted to be mentioned. Would anyone really consider having New Years Day but only referring to it only as as "January first". Can you imagine Dick Clark's January First Party. Well why would any one without sinister ulterior motives consider having Christmas without being able to mention Christ. The word itself refers to the worship of Christ, Christ Mass. Being stupid, another word for politically correct, is being stupid regardless of what you call it. Allen Barrett

Sunday, December 23, 2007 4:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab...
This is an all-time first. I agree with you wholeheartedly! But isn't it a shame and a disgrace when churches become too fearful to make mention of the Christ?

Sunday, December 23, 2007 7:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous of the 7:52 post.
Yes it is a shame and disgrace but a sad fact of life, some preachers are more concerned with protecting their jobs that doing the right thing.
As for this being an all-time first, I would bet with clear heads and open minds we probably have more to agree about than disagree over. Allen Barrett

Sunday, December 23, 2007 10:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can talk about the school system if you want but their custodians make less than $20,000 tops. Maybe you should spend more time on the county spending and less on the schools!

Monday, December 24, 2007 6:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab..
But wouldn't you think it would be my head and not yours that needed to be cleared? Just a thought.

Monday, December 24, 2007 5:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous 24 Dec 5:54
I don't know if you were referring to me or not but I went back and could not find anything written about school custodians making more than $20,000.00. I have stated that custodians at the courthouse make more that $20,000.00 but other than that I don't know what you are referring to.

To Anonymous of 24 Dec 5:47. If you re-read my post it referred to heads and minds by using the plural form of those words I spoke of both our heads and minds thus both need clarity. Allen Barrett

Tuesday, December 25, 2007 4:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab..
I understood your post perfectly, but I am all to used to your rhetoric and use of "suggestion" in your writings. Perhaps I wrongly assumed that, in the irony and arrogance of the statement, you meant that only my mind needed clearing.

Tuesday, December 25, 2007 5:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

516 read your statement agree no one should say your mind needs cleaning - obviousl, already clean as a whistle

Tuesday, December 25, 2007 10:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

516 Anoymous I suppose you know about the meaning of assume. Maybe your problem is that you read more into things than are there. Maybe you could try just reading the words, learn their meaning and go on that instead of relying of your feelings or assumptions.

Tuesday, December 25, 2007 10:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The whiners always need to have the last word, so I'll concede. But having the last word doesn't make you right or appear intelligent. You only seem to prove the adage that the one who laughs last laughs loudest.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jackson sets the salaries of the school custodians, Vanzant for the courthouse. Compare a $20,000 custodial job with all the benefits to a bank teller or whatever in Giles Co. Something wrong with this picture.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007 6:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
Perhaps I'm dense about economics. Could you explain to me what's wrong with the picture?
Should burger flippers at McDonalds earn $40,000 per year?

Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:28:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you ask the burger flippers they would all say they should earn at least $40,000.00 a year.

Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 12/27, 8:28
What I was trying to say is that custodians without any special training are making much more money than people who have positions of responsibility and that require education and/or specialist training.

Tuesday, January 01, 2008 8:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, why don't you look at the salaries of the people who take care of the buses the the children of Giles County ride to school eveyday. Compare their salaries to the county garage, the county garage employees do not take care of vehicles that haul precious cargo everyday. The employees at the bus barn have a big responsibility for such little pay.

Friday, January 11, 2008 7:52:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nobody has posted on this topic for a while and as I was reading the comments, I actually forgot what the topic was....seems everybody flew out in left field; So I think I will ramble for a few minutes. To begin with, I do wonder if most of these posters are adults, the immaturity or ignorance is appalling. Next on the issue of Christmas, I also hate it when Christ is taken out of the phrase, however the joke is on the ones who push this on Christians... the letter x in the original Greek transcripts actually stands for Christ, so the liberals are actually endorsing Christ in the holiday season. too funny. Next, everybody's favorite scapegoat, Mr. Barrett- I have never met the man and many things he says, I do not agree with but as I have stated before, he has the courage to sign his name and stand by his remarks publicly. I am a teacher and I can't, (won't) sign my name, it's no secret what would happen. And let's face it, Mr. Barrett does expose things that the public has a right to know. I have never read where he attacked someone personally, but he indeed has attacked them professionally and as someone who pays their salary, I want any corruption exposed. For that, I thank you Mr. Barrett. Unfortunately, because of the backwardness of so many and the "stuck in the 50's" mentality, your credibility is shot. I am sorry that is the case because whether one agrees or disagrees with you, you do have courage to speak publicly and you do take your personal time to do your homework. When you make a mistake, no one will ever let you forget it, and when you are right, too many will ridicule and ignore because of past incidents. Many will not listen or hear the truth you expose, even if they disagree, which obviously they realize you speak facts. Otherwise why would they react so violently? Like I said, I don't agree with a lot of what Mr. Barrett says, but I am intelligent enough to recognize that when something is exposed, "if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck", it's probably a duck! (I do realize that most won't understand this analogy, Mr. Barrett and will assume I am comparing you to a duck! Sorry)

Monday, January 21, 2008 9:09:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
I would agree that wab had been exposing quite a bit on this blog. But, it's often nothing more than his pompous rear end. And you have never read anything that even resembled name-calling from him? How about liar, idiot, anal buffoon, and on and on and on? And that is hardly a professional way of addressing people who disagree. And you are right in that more people might believe him if he would change his condescending approach to dealing with them.

Monday, January 21, 2008 3:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

909 you need to write more. You see, if you do nothing, nothing is done & the seed of Cain (328 above) will flood the landscape with traditional & Biblical episodes of deception & perversity. Judgment is up to God; but these creatures are soiling the seed of future generations. The temptor is amongst us.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
You just said that wab is everybody's scapegoat. How so? I ask because he, as well as others, have said that only a handful of people in this entire county do not esteem him as highly as you do.
Why would you want to live around a bunch of backward and "stuck in the fifties" people like those found in Giles County? Just wondered.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

934 The brook babbles because that is what it does

The high priest of babble babbles because he thinks it's his Job.

Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Detroit or somewhere in Ohio are looking better for you all the time! Just consider the pleasant climate and all the smart and exceptionally friendly people you will meet up there. It sounds almost too tempting for people of your intellectual caliber and distinction to ignore. Who among us could blame you if you took advantage of those benefits? Certainly not I.

Friday, January 25, 2008 8:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Detroit & Ohio are safe from you - you'd never find your way there! If you did, they'd more than likely put you on the bext bus for San Francisco

Saturday, January 26, 2008 9:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wrong again! I was born and raised here. I've been around the world and I know the old saying to be true. There's no place like home. I didn't call it utopia. It's home, and I plan to spend the rest of my life here.
Thankls, but no thanks. I've not lost a thing in Ohio, Michigan, California, or anywhere else for that matter. I don't have a thirst and craving for power. Do you?

Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not lost a thing - Your finding your way home hasn't gained us a thing either. Maybe you didn't lose anything, but you sure did pick up some things - higher taxation - relying on government to feed you - how to hustle your neighbors - how to change and pervert one of the last outposts of freedom (Giles County!).

You don't want power, you want guidance - someone to tell you how to spend your money, a new version of love thy neighbor, how to add 2 & 2 to get 5 and a pat on the rear end!

The people you hate want the opposite! You want to put the financial screws to us. We said no and put a qualified accountant in your little play pen to stop the BS. You are saying no. You are determined to eliminate accountability for what you & your corrupt buddies are doing to us.

If you succeed, you will find the next step isn't there. It really doesn't matter how you twist and corrupt the law and words. What a judge can ignore, a jury will not. The people still have a right to a trial! Remember the last time you decided to put the screws to two citizens? Maybe, if they had sued your corrupt little group into oblivion and taken every cent you have, this situation wouldn't exist, would it?

Friday, February 01, 2008 9:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous..
All I can say in response to your absurd post is that you are the one who sounds like a democrat. My position on conservative matters has never changed. Has yours?

Friday, February 01, 2008 5:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If that's all you can say, it ain't much.

Friday, February 01, 2008 11:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe not, but I am very proud of my conservative roots and would never forsake them, especially in view of this mondern-day democrat party. I've heard democrats say that they could never vote Republican because their parents and grandparents always voted democrat. However, what these people need to see is that this democrat party is NOT the same one their loved ones supported. How can we afford to be so naive and misled?
So, what I have may not be much, but I'm proud of every bit of it! Go GOP!

Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:54:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home