Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Monday, February 21, 2011

First 100 Days As Mayor!

This topic was requested by a reader.

After 100 days in office what do folks think about the job being done by the new mayor?

88 Comments:

Anonymous Queen Redhawk said...

Martin College has been taken care of for sure. I have no idea what Mayor Ford has done for the past 100 days. I see the meeting on tv, but you cannot hear what is said. The meetings are terrible to watch. They are a total waste of time!

Monday, February 21, 2011 11:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where is the jobs Ford had promised? Is there something in the works? Or is Ford just a speer pupet?

Monday, February 21, 2011 1:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is Pulaski NOT wanting the TVA Data Center the 200 High Paying Jobs. Does Ford not want the about 15 Million a year pumped into pulaski economy. I herd from Ford he was going to do his best to get jobs to Pulaski. Is Dan Speer and Terry realy running Pulaski?

Monday, February 21, 2011 1:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:03How has Martin College been taken care of?
Sour grapes.

Monday, February 21, 2011 4:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tell me about the TVA Data Center. this is the first I've heard about it.

Monday, February 21, 2011 7:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This so called free speech blog is a total joke.

Monday, February 21, 2011 8:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:15 I wondered where you were, what happen to asking if there were issues to discuss?

Nothing bad has been said on this thread.

Monday, February 21, 2011 8:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I said the entire blog, not just a single thread.

Monday, February 21, 2011 9:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

here is all of the info.

http://www.tvaed.com/datacenters/

Monday, February 21, 2011 10:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:15
Wonder no more; I am here and furthermore, am not the one who posted at 8:15. I too happen to think this blog is a total joke, but I never made that post.

Monday, February 21, 2011 10:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The Tennessee Valley Authority has added Nashville's Starwood Commons site to its lineup of locations to possibly build a regional data center.

TVA said in a statement that the site in southeastern Davidson County was reviewed last year but was not initially chosen. The city of Nashville continued to make improvements and resubmitted the application.

The other Tennessee sites are in Bristol, Fayetteville, Jackson, Lenoir City, Maryville, Murfreesboro and Tullahoma.

Sites are also in Guntersville, Hartselle and Athens, Ala.; Grenada and Olive Branch, Miss.; and Duffield, Va.

A TVA spokesman said Thursday such a center could employ up to 200 workers who normally are well-paid and highly skilled.

Monday, February 21, 2011 10:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Wes Kelley said...

I was told of this recent thread, and I wanted to respond with additional information. Locations selected by TVA to participate in their datacenter program must meet rigorous site selection requirements. Several months ago, representatives from TVA and Deloitte Consulting came to Pulaski to review a potential data center site in Industrial Park South. The officials were very impressed with the site and the ready availability of high-speed fiber optics. However, the TVA data center program requires redundant power feeds to the proposed site. Currently, Industrial Park South is fed from a single substation, but PES is considering the best ways to make a redundant circuit available. Once a redundant power feed is identified, we fully expect Pulaski to be included in the TVA datacenter program.

Regards,
Wes Kelley

Monday, February 21, 2011 11:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you Wes!
Glad to have you with us.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The first 3 post are those of the enabler. Please disregard anything it says no matter how inflammatory.
The goal is to isolate it, and let it fade to gray.
Does anyone have any doubt now as to how she is? No need to respond, just remember what we're dealing with.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:09:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12:09
You are right. there's no need to respond to your post...but I will.
You see, there is no enabler if you refer to me. That is a lie started on me by one who ought to know that bearing tales mand mischief are wrong.
Consider this. When you stop promoting that low-down and offensive lie, I will stop pointing it out.
By the way, the first three posts on this thread are not mine.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 6:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The enabler is a lying trouble maker and everyone here knows it.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 7:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

At last we have one person,Wes Kelly, to answer a question that was asked. That sure helps people. Thank you, Wes, I just wish more people were like you.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:45:00 AM  
Anonymous QueenRedhawk said...

12:09,
You are wrong again. I posted the first post and I am not the "enabler" or whatever you keep talking about. I am just an infrequent poster here associated with no one. Just curious.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:41:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, at least Wes responded with an "answer" not a lot of fluff! Too bad we aren't in the running, but at least it negates the need for the namecalling about who & what did or did not do. Also too bad we don't have those type of resolutions to other questions.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 1:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"QueenRedhawk", aka Christian Conservative gentleman.AKA Rabid. AKA WAB STALKER. AKA trouble maker. AKA desperately seeking attention. AKA village idiot. But best known here as the ENABLER OF EVIL.
And remember folks; that's A lie told on it, by someone who ought to know better.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:27
Well, here you are again spewing on another thread.
Did it ever occur to you that Redhawk is a MMC student or that a queen could never be a Christian conservative gentleman? Say, are you pretending to be that stipid for the sake of argument or what?
Again, there is no enabler if you refer to me. That is a lie started by one who ought to be astanding against the bearing of tales and mischief.
Do you have anything else? What about the issues you wanted to discuss??

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What has Ford done is his first 100 days? Does anyone know?

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Will someone tell me who the enabler is? I would like to see what a stupid person looks like.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 7:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Get a chance to talk with Martin Students. I feel that they were intimidated into voting for Ford. They are now speaking out and sorry they voted for him. They feel Martin was out of line allowing someone to be mayor.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:41 so you are the one said Martin college was taken care of , but did you reply when i asked how they were taken care of. I was just wondering what was done for MC.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:16 I've also talked with Martin Students and they said non one told them who to vote for.

Sorry about your sour grapes, but people didn't want Vicki for mayor. Maybe they didn't want a female or maybe Terry was the reason they didn't want her. No more "what'ca going to do about it."

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 9:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:15
"No more "what'ca going to do about it."

Oh no you didn't! HA HA HA! That's one line which will live in infamy here in the land of milk and donuts!
Not to mention You tube! HA!

"Sorry about your sour grapes, but people didn't want Vicki for mayor."

So you know who the enabler is too? I can't help but wonder how you figured this out? After all, according to the enabler, no one in Giles county is suppose to be that smart.
Now your gonna get it! She may want to meet you at Blue Bird's!
Stay tuned!
LOL!

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:56
I thought it was going to be "GAME OVER" for you guys? But you just can't stop, can you?
You once again call me a name that is a total lie started by one who ought to be standing against the bearing of falsehoods and mischief. I despise evils and would never go along with something I see as wrong. Again, that is a low-down lie.
You really seem to get the most pleasure out of calling me, among other things, Mrs. Harwell. Wrong. And, get this, I didn't vote for her either.
So do you really have anything else? Will there be an issue in the near future?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What has Pat Ford Accomplished for pulaski in his first 100 days?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What did Steve Speer accomplish for Pulaski in all his days as Mayor?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It looks like Mayor Ford needs to hire a new police chief. There have been two controversial incidents that call into question his ethics and judgment.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who hired the now police chief?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To 4:18,
I totally agree with you. Which two incidents are you speaking of? Most citizens don't know what all is truly going on in our city and county.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Somebody, please please tell me who the enabler is???????..Just give me the initials, first name, last name, anything.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To 1:09:00 PM
Well other than the fact he's mayor and the other wanna be runner up isn't,can be viewed as a pretty big accomplishment in and of itself. I'm sure that he's fulfilling the role of the office responsibly. He hasn't pulled a rabbit out of his hat or anything, so all in all: nothing extraordinary I suppose.
But what are you seriously expecting him to have done?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:03
There is no enabler. That is a devious lie.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are 5:28 and 5:29 the same person?
Just wondering. I certainly like 5:28's post.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:16 said,
"Get a chance to talk with Martin Students. I feel that they were intimidated into voting for Ford."

Now the operative word here people is "FEEL". And we all know who loves to toss around words like " I believe" or "I feel" in an effort to promote strife and suspicion, when there is not a single verifiable speck of evidence to support such a monumental lie.
The remainder of this post does nothing more than expose the depth of who this person really is, and just how low they can go in demonizing their opponents.

Talk about sad....... disgusting is a better description.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

@4:40, The incident with Dr. Terry Wynn and Chad Estes and now the incident with Clay McCalister and the demotion (say what you want that's what it is) of Lt. Dean Glossup. Dickey seems to say one thing and do another and then contradict himself a few days later. But I am sure that these two events are just the tip of the iceberg.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tip of what iceberg? Are you suggesting that the Chief is dirty, or incompetent? Or is there some political manipulation being suggested?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I will put it to you this way. There are only a handful of Pulaski cops that I trust and Dean Glossup is among them and look what happened to him. I am not making any accusations, but I can only tell you that my gut tells me that something is rotten in Denmark.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:23
I agree. Didn't he state in the newspaper that he was mistaken about Mr. McAlister and that he was pressured into taking premature action? It's such a shame. The truth is going to come out soon.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have talked with Martin Students and I asked them if anyone at the college told them who to vote for and they said NO!


Since we are talking about Mt. McAlister, why did he think he needed to move Mrs. Vanzant's sign. Most people don't pay any attention to those signs anyway. Why did he run to VZ next morning to tell her what happen?

does Joe need to worry?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:21
That was a sleazy statement you made about Joe. You guys never cease to amaze me.
Oh, and here's what I know to be a fact about the flag caper. Prior to the afternoon Mr. McAlister stopped to move Mrs. Vanzant's sign, barrett had moved his signs right up next to hers (on both sides) to block her sign from view. Mr. McAlister only moved her sign. How do I know that? I went out there shortly after it happened, and saw barrett's signs right where they had been the day before. That being the case, Mr. McAlister either did not touch those signs or someone put them back up immediately after they had been thrown down a bank. Now which one of those two scenarios seem more believable?

Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"That being the case, Mr. McAlister either did not touch those signs or someone put them back up immediately after they had been thrown down a bank. Now which one of those two scenarios seem more believable?"

I happen to know WAB, and I can tell that he wouldn't have raised a stink if he didn't have the goods on the man. In the case of the the "tape" being erased, I wouldn't be surprised about that either.
But seeing as to how it can no longer be proved or disproved, both Allen and Clay need to drop this mess and move on.
As for Dean Glossup: there is not a better man who currently resides here, and I don't like how this man has been treated one bit.
But again, seeing as to how there is no evidence to prove anything, we all have to accept things as they are. Unfortunately, that is.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 7:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The lesson to be learned from WAB's incident is never let the original tape out of your sight until you can make a copy.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:56 is a enabler and an liar.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 9:20:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

who has the original tape. If the tape was copied to a disc, the original tape should still be in tact. I have a degree in computer technology and I know for a fact that when you copy data from a tape to a disc, the orginial data remains the same on the tape. The only way that data is removed is by purposely deleting it before the copy is made, however it remains in tact on the hard drive and a forensic computer tech can retrieve any and all data, regardless if it is deleted. WHY IS THE CHIEF NO PROSECUTING ANYONE FOR TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE. GLOSSUP AND BARRETT HAVE BOTH MADE STATEMENTS THAT SOMEONE HAS DELETED THE INFAMOUS SCENE. MOST IMPORTANTLY, WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT IT DELETED OTHER THAN MC ALISTER AND IT IS A FACT THAT HE HAS NOT HAD ACCESS TO THE TAPE AT ANY TIME.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 10:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:56 It is so amazing how you use to go out and check where the signs were so often. Why did you go the next day after the Mr. McAlister moved Mrs. Vanzant's sign, was you told about what happen?

I don't understand why Barrett would try to hide Vanzant's sign, they weren't running for same office. That one he might of won as people outside of district 7 would be voting in.

I like 10:21pm don't understand why McAlister moved the sign. Sometimes it's best to stay out of other people's business.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 10:24:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with you! What was Clay doing moving "Vanzant's" sign in the first place? Why is her or anyone's sign placement any of his concern?

Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:26
Here's another question. Why did barrett go out there and position his signs on both sides of Mrs. Vanzant's sign to make it unviewable? What gave him the right to do that, particularly since he was not running against her? Mr.McAlister was simply moving her sign out away from barrett's so it could be seen. What was wrong with that? Furthermore, I went out there shortly after the police were called, and Mrs. Vanzant's sign was moved out closer to the street. Those put up by barrett were still right where they were the day before. I know this, because I saw it. Please tell me who the real troublemaker was in this situation? Who provoked the entire thing?

9:20
There is no enabler if you refer to me. Again, that is a lie. Do you have anything else?

Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"barrett had moved his signs right up next to hers (on both sides) to block her sign from view."

Let me preface something here. I am not a confidant nor a follower of WAB. I do know the man. I respect him as a person. I agree with much of what he says, but I do disagree with his methods for getting the attention of citizens when ever he sees something questionable. I do think that he could go about it perhaps in a different manner. But I do firmly believe the man means well.
That being said, I can honestly state that I do not believe he would have intentionally "blocked" the signs of another political candidate using his own signage, and especially when it's a candidate seeking another position.
No doubt he has enemies in local positions here in Giles county, who will do most anything to discredit his character. But I know the man wouldn't knowingly do something like that.
As Bill O'Reilly has stated many times,"the powerful protect the powerful"; sometimes the powerful protect those who share the same interest.
I'm not saying that someone in side the police dept tampered with evidence in this case. But I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be the case either.
AND remember that the position of Police Chief is political n nature as well!

Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who provoked the entire thing?

9:20

You did! Who posted two times or more a day about the signs. I guess finally clay couldn't take it any more, so he decided to bring vanzant's sign out in front.

Sure have been a lot of post on this site and not about First 100 Days as Mayor.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Again, why was clay moving anyone's signs? Where did he gain the authority to do so?

Thursday, February 24, 2011 5:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:25
Who gave barrett the authority to put his signs right up next to Mrs. Vanzant's sign...on both sides? If he didn't intentionally try to block Mrs. Vanzant's sign, then why were they placed right next to hers on both sides? I saw them. They were still there after Clay moved Mrs. Vanzant's sign out to where it could be seen.

4:11
Are you suggesting that Mr. McAlister moved Mrs. Vanzant's sign because he couldn't take what I said about the situation? Preposterous.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:06, I think clay kept reading your whining about the sandwich sign until he thought he would move it.

I find it funny, I saw signs all next to one another so close you had to stop to read all of them in Marshall and Maury county and heard no complaining. I'm talking about some being hide. Look like some people put their sign up and others put theirs where ever they could in the spot.

don't tell me there was plenty of room where Barrett and Vanzants signs were I knew that. Just saying no one had a hisses fit in Maury and Marshall county over signs.

Did it bother Mrs. Vanzant or did she just roll with the flow. I think she would of been a lady about it.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:58
I think it's even funnier that you would insult Mr. McAlister's intelligence by suggesting that he was moved to action by my comments on this ridiculous blog. He knew what was going on out there and did something about it. It's just that simple, and I think you know that.
You want to blame me with this mess, but I'm not the one who is responsible for this fiasco. And what you claim to have seen in another county about signs being very close to each other is NOT the same situation at all.
More than that, there was ample room on either side of Mrs. Vanzant's sign for the placement of other signs such that all could be viewed. So why did barrett's signs need to be right up beside hers? Did you even go out and look at the way they were positioned? Perhaps you should have.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about Mr.Barrett being out all day with his camera on the day of the big bang? Why dosen't he tell that part?

Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tomorrow's forecast ismuch cooler than today.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 9:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think if people would MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS, then none of this would have happened in the first place.
If anyone had a reason to be annoyed by someone's sign being too close to theirs, it should be the person running for office, and they alone should have contacted the offender, and asked them to move their own sign.
When people like Clay take charge out of some sort of dislike of the opponent, then they are being childish, and taking matters that have nothing to do with themselves into their own hands. There are laws regarding his conduct, and he knows there are, and he knows he shouldn't have done what he did.
I pass that area everyday, and I never saw Allen Barret's signs blocking anyone's sign. SO whoever is promoting the tale that he intentionally blocked Vanzant's Sign with his own is a trouble making liar.

Friday, February 25, 2011 8:20:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:27 I expected Barrett to be watching his signs to see who was moving them, you should have too.

Friday, February 25, 2011 9:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:20
There were plenty of people who saw those signs right up next to Mrs. Vanzant's sign. Her sign was there first. So is everyone who saw that to be considered troublemaking liars?

Friday, February 25, 2011 3:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:22 I saw the sign, they were close,but i could see Vanzant's sign.
With all the space i can see why you think they were so close. If it had been a smaller space for sign, that would of been alright.

Why WAB put them like that I don't know, but have heard enough about that old news. This is like trying to fight the civil War again.

Please everybody can we move on.
Has anybody looked at these gas prices?

Friday, February 25, 2011 8:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:46
I think you are right. We need to be discussing the gas situation and end all the name-calling and attacks.
It's my understanding that there's enough oil in a reserve somewhere out West to run our country for generations. Yet, the government won't allow drilling to begin. They make excuses while the Middle East holds their oil over our heads like a hot biscuit for a hungry dog. In the meantime, our young men and women are over there dying for them! Oh, and it seems anybody but the United States can drill in the Gulf. Is it any wonder our nation is laughed at so often?
Will five dollars a gallon gasoline bring this country to its knees? I think it just might, and that is heart-breaking.
Another possible thread topic could be cures for cancer. We were promised those cures several decades ago. Are they already available yet unavailable? Would their being brought forward put an end to a multi-billion dollar industry? Would pharmaceutical companies and surgeons be happy with that? In the meantime, our friends and loved ones die of cancer.
Again, good post.

Saturday, February 26, 2011 6:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:27 PM Mr Barrett is not saying about being out all day with his camera because its simply not true. He caught McAlister the second time he sat awhile to observe his signs. No harm in that and he hit the jackpot!

Saturday, February 26, 2011 1:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1:54
I have a some questions for you. How did you know he sat out there waiting for someone to come al0ong? How would you know that? Why would he do that if he didn't think he had set a trap? Is that why he provoked the situation by putting his signs right up beside Mrs. Vanzant's sign? It reminds me of the boy who placed a chip on his shoulder and dared somebody to knock it off.

Saturday, February 26, 2011 2:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello

Saturday, February 26, 2011 2:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please everybody can we move on.
Has anybody looked at these gas prices?

$3.19
$3.29
$3.39

Saturday, February 26, 2011 2:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gas HIGH? So what. That is exactly what BO wanted. He stated clearly in an interview that 5 even 6 bucks a gallon wouldn't bother him. And I don't suppose it would; seeing as to how we the tax payers are footing his ridiculous salary. Not to mention the salary of the rest of his high an mighty commie friends.
Give me back my country and keep the change!

Saturday, February 26, 2011 5:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:47
I agree with you that BO doesn't care. It looks as if ours will sooner than later become a society of the rich and the poor with the slow demise of the middle class. He surely must know this. It's sickening. What becomes of us when social security is gone?

Saturday, February 26, 2011 7:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Social security is going to be gone soon.

Sorry, but who is BO?

Saturday, February 26, 2011 8:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Sorry, but who is BO?"

Your kidding. Right?

Hint- What is our presidents initials?
Without the middle one of course.

Saturday, February 26, 2011 11:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:19 You surely dont consider trying to catch a thief as 'setting a trap'? Any one of us would do the same thing if someone was interferring with our property and we had the opportunity to do somerthing about it. Only one who 'set a trap' was the person involved in moving signs. He did it to himself. As for how would I know about Mr Barrett, same way you knew all about the signs and McAllister.

Sunday, February 27, 2011 10:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You folks complaining about BO and how he doesn't care are really misinformed. This blog is becoming a place where idiots come to whine and complain. You really need a life. Let's vote for and elect a Hitler like person. That might be the kind of leader some of you want. If this is what you want, move to Libya. Momar is looking for a few good men.

Sunday, February 27, 2011 7:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The previous commie lib remark is the calling card of the ENABLER.
So very nice to see you posting in your usual democrat elitist catch phrases once again. Are you still posing as that "christian conservative" he man you profess to be?

Sunday, February 27, 2011 10:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:07
As I've told you many, many times, there is no enabler if you refer to me. That is a lie started on me by one who ought to have a clear understanding about what the scriptures teach with regard to telling lies and the spreading of mischief.
You again call me the usual names. Shameful. I happen to be a quite conservative Christian gentleman who would never knowingly go along with evil or wrong.
You must live a sad life.

Monday, February 28, 2011 5:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:07
Oh, by the way, you lied when you falsely accused me of making the post in question.
Again, do you have ANYTHING else? Is there an issue on the horizon that needs to be discussed? I thought we had finally got passed this!

Monday, February 28, 2011 5:41:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Same old broke record over and over. I would like to see something different on here.

Monday, February 28, 2011 7:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:59
They just can't stop with the name-calling and troublemaking it seems.

Monday, February 28, 2011 4:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:04 You are right they just can't quit name calling and you just can't quit with your same old post. What good does to repeat it over and over?

Oh, I guess it makes you feel good.
Most people thought the name calling was acting like children and ignored it, but then you make them change their mind.

Monday, February 28, 2011 7:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:44
What good does it do to repeat that same old troublemaking lie over and over? The only enabler I know of is the one who knowingly keeps this going. I will point it out as a lie every time I see it.
I thought we had gotten beyond it. Guess not.

Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:59 At least you said it a little different this time. lol

Tuesday, March 01, 2011 8:41:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

GTC says:

1st off this has nothing to do what so ever with this blog subject; but I had to speak my opinion on the subject of Tee jackson's current evaluation,

The Giles County Board of Education discussed the recently completed evaluation of Director of Schools Tee Jackson. Using a numeric rating system, Jackson’s overall score was 3.5 of a possible 5. Chair Mike Young noted the Jackson's scoring meets and exceeds the board’s expectations.

Jackson’s contract, which has 16 months remaining, will be discussed at a work session when all board members are present.

A 3.5 on a 5 point scale provide Tee Jackson a score of 70 out of 100. Where I went to school a 70 is the very very very lowest "C" score. One point less and he would get a "D". So the very lowest "C" exceeds the School Boards expectations???????

WOW!!!!!!!!!

No wonder our children are allowed to get away with some of the lowest GPA's in Middle Tennessee while costing more than most Counties.


Way to go Tee. Keep up the good work. With a bit of effort you just might rise yourself to a "D".

Monday, March 07, 2011 2:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Board don't expect much does it?

Monday, March 07, 2011 5:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have to look at the individual board members scores to really understand what a terrible mistake was made with the election of some.

Monday, March 07, 2011 8:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone know what the individual scores are?

Tuesday, March 08, 2011 7:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tee has given newspaper his own interpretation of exceeds when he really didn't make av. He has tried to manipulate the scores and ask that some scores not count. Does anyone know if all board members even scored him. I know for a fact the scores of one board member and those scores would have knocked off a bunch of points. He doesn't have Cathy Norman there to give him all 5's and I would only think that Jerry Bryant would give him high scores. After being written up in the past year and other things he was reprimanded for he should have scored low.
And Mr. Barrett were you present at the meeting when board members (2) said it would take about 24 months to look for a replacement. they are letting the months slip away and are they going to add some time again to get 24 months. At the meeting they should be putting him on notice that in June 2012 he will be terminated. Just think, if he hadn't gotten another year he would be gone this June, BUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Friday, March 11, 2011 1:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know I"m way late on this topic but he has done nothing but take care of Martin Methodist College. Has anyone looked at their 20-20 plan that just recently got approved? They lay it out on their website. They plan on taking over the whole area (plus more) that Martin stands on. They plan to close it off so nobody can go through that area. There was also a rumor that they were trying to remodel the public library and consolidate it with their library.

Sunday, May 27, 2012 10:41:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home