Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Startling Revelations From Today's County Budget Committee Meeting

There were three really amazing events revealed at the Budget Committee Meeting this morning.
There was no approvals or disapproval's today only a number of departments presenting their request for the coming year's budget.

The first amazing thing was the fact that the only department, the Highway Department, that has consistently endured budget cuts was the only one presenting today that provided the most comprehensive reason for increasing their budget yet were the only one that ended their presentation with their commitment to doing what they could with what they were given. Almost every other presentation involved the idea that they just couldn't exist with one less penny.

The second amazing presentation was from Mr. David Rackley speaking on behalf of the Industrial Development  Board. In his presentation Mr Rackley seemed to insult the intelligence of every person in the room by say he had "been through the budget with a fine tooth comb and cut practically everything". Now the question is if the budget for last year was drastically cut or even suffered a razor burn how come they were asking from more this year $5,000.00 more from the county? When this question was asked by Commissioner Pollard, a member of the Budget Committee, bully tactics were quickly incorporated and he was verbally attacked my Mr. Rackley as wrong even though Commissioner Pollard showed him the numbers in black and white from the budget. Mr. Rackley even included an audience member, who had not said a single word to that point,. in his abusive rant. It seems if you are asking the Budget Committee for an increase in your budget it should at least be based of truthful information and the members should not be treated with such utter contempt.

Now the third revelation that come up was a shocker to everyone in the room. Question, how do you make $4,200.00 in two weeks working for the county in addition to your regular county salary? Understand that at $50.00 an hour the person would have to work at least 84 hours of overtime which is more overtime than regular duty hours. As was stated by the perplexed commissioners and County Executive we'll have to wait until Roy "Director of the Ambulance Service" comes in tomorrow with his budget, until then everyone was left shaking their heads.

Budget Committee meets again tomorrow, Thursday, at 9:30 AM.  

146 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you hate David that much?

Thursday, May 30, 2013 6:34:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Why would anyone think I hate a person simply for stating what he said and did in a public forum? I don't hate anyone, I just stated the things that happened as I and others saw and heard them.

Of all that I commented on why are you apparently only bothered by a person instead of the real problems?

Does it not surprise or bother you that the county paid out 4200 dollars to one person in a two week period plus their regular salary?
Would you like someone who has worked over 160 hours to tend your injuries or drive you to a Nashville hospital?

Does it not bother you that a person in a position of responsibility would tell the committee that he has cut his budget from last year when there is absolutely no question that his budget is at least 5000 dollars higher and that is just the county's part?

Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:42:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

6:34, I really don't think Allen's personal feelings toward Rackley has anything to do with the subject at hand. To give DR the benefit of the doubt, let's just say he was mistaken. When the mistake was brought to his attention, however, he didn't apologize for being wrong; he became abusive. Abusive to the point of laying into a person who didn't even say anything. Do you honestly not have a problem with that?

As to the issue with Roy, I like him and always have. That fact not withstanding, I am greatly interested in his explanation of the vast amount of overtime claimed. I think he is a great guy, and he has come to my aid on more than one occasion. That does not mean that he shouldn't have to answer for the seemingly outrageous salary that he was paid. Hate is not always the motivating factor when one questions an official. Just my thoughts on the matter.

Ray

Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Barrett
No, I am BOTHERED by what I believe to be your hatred and jealousy toward those you feel have wronged YOU in some way. That's my opinion. .

Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:27:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

An since you have no insight for ones thoughts....you know what they say about opinions 1127

Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:47:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Well the mystery of the overtime has been explained by Mr. Griggs? It seems he had one person, a supervisor, worked 230 hours during one two week period? The individual, as reported by Mr. Griggs, was able to "maintain a high level of proficiency" during that time by being able to sleep much of the time.
Also according to Mr. Griggs this is not anything unusual.
Apparently it is more efficient, according to Mr. Griggs, to have a person work a 24 hour shift and and pay overtime for a person to sleep than to organize a system of eight or twelve hour shifts with personnel actually awake during their tour of duty. The Ambulance Service last year paid $142,782.00 in overtime last year much of it for supervisors.
My question is wouldn't it be more economical to have people work a twelve hour shift and have an additional supervisor to cover the the spaces caused by vacations, sick day etc?
Better scheduling would correct much of the expense of overtime. It is absurd that a person, any person be paid overtime for sleeping.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Violet said...

"Apparently it is more efficient, according to Mr. Griggs"

Did he actually SAY that's what he thinks? That he thinks it's more "efficient"? It sounds to me like he's just taking the lazy way out, avoiding doing scheduling and recruiting. LAZY and inept at managing.

We need to share what EFFICIENT means with Mr. Griggs: Performing or functioning in the best possible manner with the least waste of time and effort, or utilizing a particular commodity with the least waste of resources or effort. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/efficient

Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:27 Seems like you are a little jealous of Barrett. That is hard to understand why. I'm sure you are going to come back with you aren't but you post against him so much it looks that way.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought if you was on salary, you didn't get over time pay. I should have known I could get overtime pay years ago, when I think of all the extra hours I put in. Oh well water under the bridge now.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David Rackley says that he is right and the rest of the world is wrong!

Thursday, May 30, 2013 6:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rackley was given a challenge to figure out which was a hole in the ground and which was his butt, more than a year later he's still trying to figure it out. He just stands there scratching his head not realizing he's put his finger on the problem.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 6:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wouldn't piss on any of you if you were on fire. What a bunch of idiots. I can't believe a blog as retarded as this one exists. Barrett has been a joke to everyone I know for years and you fools follow him. Enjoy your idiocy, because everyone you know laughs at you.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:47
I post so much against Barrett, certainly not out of jealousy. I do so out of disgust for his behavior. I have NO earthly desire to be anything like him.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Barrett's problem is he can't stand anyone that is smarter than he is and he attacks them with his half truths! What a joke! My dog runs circles around Barrett's intelligence and those idiots that believe his crap!

Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WAB only wishes he was as smart and in David's position! I think David is the most influential person in this county! He would have my vote for any public office!

Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's no doubt Rackley's smarter than you, 10:15, but then, that's not saying a whole lot, is it?

9:47, you must be very close to your dog. Do her puppies look like you?

Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The most influential person? Disowned by his father. Has no friends. Can't keep a wife or family. Can not be trusted. Most devious person that I know.

Keep preachin!

Friday, May 31, 2013 8:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow--you may not like him, but that's a bit much isn't it!

Friday, May 31, 2013 1:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For all you that can't tell 8:50 is Jim Cardin posting! Someone should ask him about all the stuff he has stolen and vandalized. A true model citizen!

Friday, May 31, 2013 1:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

One big problem we have in Pulaski is that certain people are under the false belief that they should be afforded more and better privileges simply because of their last name, i.e. Curry, Speer, Rackley, Cardin, Harwell, etc. This town is so cliquey and if you don't belong to the right clique then no only can you not get anything done, but you are also treated with contempt.

Friday, May 31, 2013 2:14:00 PM  
Anonymous David Rackley said...

(Part 1 of 2) Mr Barrett and other posters,

Once again I am being personally attacked on this blog. I have refrained from responding for obvious reasons. But now you attack my family. Mr. Barrett again your statements are false and misleading to the readers. Addressing your comments in order!

1) There is a big difference in the Industrial Development Board (IDB) and the Economic Development Commission (EDC). I have no involvement on with the IDB whatsoever.
I am Chairman of EDC.

2) You stated the EDC had cable bills of $100 per month. To be exact they are $143.33 for the entire year. A gross overstatement on your part.

3) EDC has two telephone lines and one is used for a fax line. The director has ONE cell phone.

4) Hillcrest County Club Membership was canceled by me with great hesitation. Hillcrest is an asset to this community and should be supported. It is a tool for industrial recruiting. People that are looking to move their business/industry to Giles County are looking for more than just work. Recreation, schools and many other factors contribute to their decisions. It was never used by anyone on our Board for personal use.

5) Car Wash at $35. Dan has the EDC vehicle cleaned when prospective people come to town and he has to drive them around.

6) EDC Lunches - $8 per person is a small amount to pay for each VOLUNTEER member monthly. For most of us that is ALL we get, a free meal, and yes providing a meal does encourage our members to attend regularly. We have discussed cutting this and a motion was made to continue providing this and it passed with one member voting against.

7) "Lavish" Health Insurance Plan - Dan's insurance agent is Elaine Hickman. It is with Blue Cross Blue Shield. His deductible is $1000. It provides NO Dental, NO Vision, NO Life Insurance, No Disability. In my opinion this is far from "lavish".

The average Revenue for the past 6 years of EDC is $207,440 with average expenses $203,286
Expenses for 2012 were $237,204
Expenses for 2013 to date are $169,578.
Out of 40 expense categories, 25 categories had a decrease. Income also decreased by almost $40,000.

We cut the budget request for Industrial Park maintenance by $5000 from City and County because we were able to work out a deal to swap hay rights for bush hogging.
We have requested basically the same amount because our income and expenses fluctuate from year to year as presented to the Budget Committee on Thursday. Unfortunately this year we had extensive legal bills due to the Silicon Ranch/Wilson Stevenson lawsuits. If we prevail, we should recoup those legal fees.

We are trying to continue the efforts of the Small Business Development Center and would like to bring that under the direction of EDC. We have asked the City of Pulaski, Pulaski Electric and the County for $10,000 each to fund this position. Therefore we only asked for a $5000 increase in the County Contribution.

Friday, May 31, 2013 3:42:00 PM  
Anonymous David Rackley said...

(Part 2 of 2)
If there is a commissioner reading this that feels I "insulted the intelligence of every person in the room" as you stated. Please accept my apology. My frustration was directed solely at Mr. Barrett and his false statements that he has posted regarding EDC budget.

Mr. Barrett,last year, when you attacked me and accused me of accessing a voting machine while being non-certified and your blog turned to attack me personally, I emailed and mailed you request to remove these non-related comments. You refused to do so. Now they have again turned personal and attacking my family for no apparent reason. I respectfully ask you to remove these comments.

I have no faith that you will do this based on our previous conversation. Therefore, I will state that I have met with an attorney regarding this. Your former opposing counsel. While he told me I had a solid case against you, the problem was you had no assets to acquire. His exact words to me were, "I would have to charge you approximately $10,000 to obtain a judgment. And while his assets are in his wife's name, until he dies or divorces you have nothing and I would hate to take your money just for that, but I will".

So with that said, If there is anyone reading this blog that has been attacked like I have and would like to join with me in obtaining that judgment and stopping these malicious attacks, please email me at david@davidrackley.com. I have an attorney that has stated he will discount his rate to represent us.

I will not comment on this on here again. If you have concerns regarding the Economic Development Commission I will be happy to discuss on the phone or in person, as always.

Friday, May 31, 2013 3:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Totally Awesome Dude! I hope this shuts Ray up too.

Friday, May 31, 2013 3:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

Friday, May 31, 2013 4:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David.....Thank you so much for putting that guy in his place. Ironically, I had heard just today that Barrett had put everything in his wife's name. Or perhaps she insisted that he did? Who knows. Either way, it's just a stinking shame that he continues to get away with the things he does. Even more shameful is the fact that two or perhaps three give him a free pass right here on this blog.
Again, I thank you David for exposing some real corruption.

Friday, May 31, 2013 5:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now I understand why that snake had the nerve to accuse good and honest people of voter fraud and to suggest that Terry Harwell might have had a sex change operation. What good would a judgment be against him if everything is in his wife's name? Let no man say Barrett is not clever.

Friday, May 31, 2013 5:15:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

3:59, you have about as much chance of shutting me up as you do scoring above "dumbass" on an I.Q. test. I'll say what I damned well please and there's nothing a cowardly piece of crap like you can do about it. Any questions? Totally awesome post, dud. Rock on, fool.

Ray

Friday, May 31, 2013 5:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know anything about Harwell except he has a fairly nice rack. Just saying.

Friday, May 31, 2013 5:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:52
And what a shame you are to your fellow man. Don't hate.

Friday, May 31, 2013 6:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Rackley,
I think the entire election commission save maybe for one along with the Harwells should join you in a lawsuit to get these malicious attacks stopped. Just saying.

Friday, May 31, 2013 7:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David,
You posted a lot in defense of Speer and the EDC. I personally know Dan Speer to be a liar and an abuser of the positions he holds in the public's trust.

Concerning your post I have seen the invoices for the charges Mr. Barrett has claimed. Why should we take your word for it especially in light of your defense of someone I know is incompetent in his EDC position and a liar. May I ask if you are one of the ones Mayor Speer appointed to sit on EDC when it was organized? And can you pick up your own meals when the EDC meets or reschedule the meetings for another time when they do not interfere with the EDC members meals? I do not think the tax payers should buy you lunch. I have been to your lunch meetings and it is a ridiculous expense to the tax payers but I am sure you will state it is a necessary expense and vital to Giles County Economic Development.

In addition do you have any interest in Hillcrest? Sit on any boards because I have seen many people defend That private club like it is a public school. Aren't there some Speer's on the board of Hillcrest and maybe some Cardins? Are there any Rackley's?

" Hillcrest is an asset to this community and should be supported. It is a tool for industrial recruiting. People that are looking to move their business/industry to Giles County are looking for more than just work. Recreation, schools and many other factors contribute to their decisions. It was never used by anyone on our Board for personal use." David I am starting to wonder if you are even qualified to sit on the EDC.

Friday, May 31, 2013 7:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David,

One more thing. What is the compensation for each member of the EDC as outlined in the rules that established the EDC? Does it include meals as part of the compensation for appointed board members or is it outlined that each appointed member shall receive no compensation. Being served meals is receiving compensation so I am curious to the rules and if they are being upheld by the " Chairman of EDC" and its members.

Friday, May 31, 2013 7:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the ones wronged on this gossip blog should sue Barrett, his wife and their dog.... Get them all, whether she has had anything to do with it or not, why not? He shows no mercy on anyone else. Barrett may have more to lose than he thinks, lawsuits are expense, and he could not defend what he writes.

Friday, May 31, 2013 10:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow----

What I don't understand is how opposite groups can believe they are right. ONE of them HAS to be wrong. It mostly looks like an accounting trick (ether way) to prove a point......how will we decide for ourselves?

Friday, May 31, 2013 10:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would have to stand behind the facts and numbers Mr. Rackley posted. I think Barrett posted anonymously to try and defend himself. Calling someone a liar and saying they saw something isn't very much proof to negate what was written by Rackley.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 1:13:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No it was not Mr. Barrett posting anonymously. I posted and have many other questions concerning what Mr. Rackley posts as truth. Pollard thinks Rackley's math is inaccurate and Barrett I bet can pull photocopies of what he states so why are we to blindly believe David. As far as Elaine Hickman being the agent on record of Dan's policy, she is Brenda Speer's business partner. Doesn't Brenda, Elaine, and a few other agents at EBS pool all commissions generated from policies they write. If this is so then Brenda receives the same compensation as Elaine on the policy Elaine wrote for Dan. Now if Dan and Brenda make money from the agents commission then there is a conflict. If Elaine receives 100% of the commission I don't think there is a conflict. I do think if Dan has to be covered using tax dollars then he should have the exact same plan as every other County Employee and be rolled into the group plan.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 2:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:10
I'd say go for it if it could be done. But it might be hard to prove that Mrs. Barrett has been a part of this all along. I rather doubt that she has been a participant in the things he has done, but I have so often wondered how she put up with him.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 7:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the country club is such an assest then how about telling how many of the EDC and OSCar board are members of the important tool that impresses so much. Don’t the. Club still allow members to bring guests in? Entertain guest on your own membership.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 8:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps I missed something in one of Allen's posts, but I can't find the one where he said anything about ol' asswipe rackley's family. There was one posted by a cowardly, anonymous poster, but if it's true, there isn't a damned thing dave can do about it. The truth ain't always pretty, but it sure isn't an offense a whiny cry-baby can sue over.

Which part are you contesting, anyway. The disowning part or the part where you can't keep a wife? I thought that was common knowledge, easily obtainable by the public. Nope, merely sounds like less-than-sweet grapes by the illustrious david rackley. Live with it, or make an ass of yourself by trying to sue.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 6:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:13
No the really sad thing for David is that he can't sue and get anything from Allen Barrett, since (on paper) he owns nothing. Clever. Isn't that a real testimonial to one's reputation?

Saturday, June 01, 2013 6:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No one has proven that rackley was slandered. Until that happens, the whole point is moot.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 9:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You people who rant and slander by hiding with an anonymous post should really look at yourself. It is easy to talk about someone when you don't ID yourself. Shame on all of you for putting personal business on here and things that should not be public about someone. What a community we live in. And, you want this community to prosper? Who wants to be a part of such trash?

Fred Gibson

Saturday, June 01, 2013 9:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wish you people wouldn't slander anyone. You've treated David and Allen terrible in these post.
Can any of you prove any of it about David or how do you know everything Allen has is in his wife's name?

When you get down to it who's business is it about either one of them?
Allen posted what he thought happen. David has posted his side. The rest of you have gossiped.

Saturday, June 01, 2013 10:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fred
You make a couple of good and interesting points. I have heard people from outside the county make comments about all the strife and troublemaking going on here. It's an embarrassment, and you are absolutely right. Why would anyone want to locate to a place like that? I love our county and just think it's a shame.
As for the posting personal business, I think it got pretty personal when Allen Barrett made a sleazy thread about a possible sex change operation for Terry Harwell...a man he personally hates.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 5:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone in their right mind really think Barrett was actually suggesting that Harwell actually had a sex change. Ridiculous, you must have a wonderful time with the late night comedians and what they say not to mention Saturday Night Live and the Stewart show. Grow up and get real.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 9:11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone in their right mind really think Barrett actually believed Harwell had a sex change? If you do you must go crazy with what the late night comedians have said, not to mention Sarturday Night Live and the Stewart. Show. Grow up and stop whining about things that don ’t exist.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 9:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:19
Go back and read the title sentence in that trashy and sleazy thread about Terry Harwell. It was posed as a question. It reads 'Did Commissioner Terry Harwell Really Have a Sex Change Or Was He Just Confused And Angry?' That statement "suggests" that there is or has been a certain amount of discussion as to whether he has had a sex change operation. At the very LEAST, Barrett accused Terry of having a moment of sexual confusion. How dare him!
Joking or not, this was a sleazeball thing to do, and I believe Barrett started this particular thread out of spite and hatred. How low can anyone go?
How can you defend such behavior? Would you be so eager to defend Barrett had he started a thread like that about you? Would you think it was a joke then?

Sunday, June 02, 2013 4:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:45
NO, David is the one who was treated badly on this thread, and guess who started it? That's right, none other than William Allen Barrett.
I wonder if Barrett will be man enough to remove this thread as per David's request. I doubt it. It's just a rotten stinking shame that anyone can get away with low-life stuff like this because he or she has no tangible assets to lose in a lawsuit.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 4:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Damn, cg, isn't that exactly like you do when you ask someone if they are stupid or what? Barrett was not accusing, according to you, merely asking. Now you're saying such a question "suggests" something. You can't have it both ways and not be a hypocrite. Are you a hypocrite or what?

Sunday, June 02, 2013 5:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:09
What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Maybe ole Terry should not go around accusing anymore citizens of being homosexual in the middle of the street at a public function. Or any other citizens of being a nut. That is truly disgusting behavior. Or maybe ole Vicky and Terry should not go around lying to the police after Terry attacks a citizen physically and then throws water on him. That is truly disgusting behavior.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 5:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Damn 4:09 you really can’t read can you. The sentence says "Hungry" not angry. I can’ t believe all your whining and anger was because you can’t and no one was there to tell you the difference between words in paper and words in your head. No wonder you do make any damn sense.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 5:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Last year EDC spent $1000 to sponser a song writer dream and Speer took the credit! This year we are saving that money.The EDC pays nearly $400 a month in retirment expenses.As Rackly says Speer does not get a pension so 12 times $400 + $1000 =$5800 so no increase necessary ror the County.
What is the law suit about? Is it Speers fault???

Sunday, June 02, 2013 6:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

in addition to your post 6:07 take away the meals at $8.00 a head and you have another $1000 saved. $5800+1000=6800.

I would ask to show the benefits of incurring the sba when everything is online. What businesses have opened because we had a sba. Why can't Dan answer questions about the SBA and help people out and save the $15000? I guess Dan would need some qualifications other than psychology major.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 6:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:10 (5:17)
No, that is not exactly what I am doing when I ask if you are stupid or what? I really want to know. I ask because you have to be one of the stupidest people on earth or one of the most devious and troublemaking.
Now, the difference in my asking that question and what Barrett said in his trashy thread is simple. He asked if Terry really had a sex change operation or if he was just confused and hungry (typo on angry instead on hungry). What Barrett did was suggest that it has already been discussed at least by some in the community. In other words, has Terry or has he not had a sex change operation? In my opinion, Barrett was trying to make Terry look bad in his own community, and that is so low-life.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 8:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sunday, June 02, 2013 4:09:00 PM
Was Barret talking about you? If not was it really any of your business?

Sunday, June 02, 2013 9:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought Terry Harwell was a big enough man to fight his own battles. It amazes me how CG thinks he needs to fight them for him.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 10:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Exactly 8:27. That is exactly what Terry did when he called a heterosexual man a faggot. He was trying to demean Bob in public and that is as you say "so low life" but even worse when you follow it up by throwing water and filing false police reports to make a person look bad in the community. How is that better in your twisted mind than what you claim Barrett does?

Sunday, June 02, 2013 10:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look folks, y'all just was to forget it. You know damn good and well cg has never, nor will he ever be, wrong. I'm sure he was like this in school and every damn day of his life. You can't tell anyone anything when they already know everything. Impossible as it may sound, he really believes this in his mind.

Sunday, June 02, 2013 10:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:02 (10:220
Look, I have already stated somewhere on this blog that Terry owes Bob an apology if he called him a faggot. Although I can appreciate Terry's being upset and angry, I don't condone name-calling. He should apologize for that just as Barrett should apologize for his name-calling.
As for your saying I see myself as never being wrong, I just had to laugh.
Why do you keep on and on trying to stir up needless trouble?

Monday, June 03, 2013 6:48:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:02 (10:22)
I'd like to throw out something for you to consider. We were having a Bible study about forgiveness. Question. Do you think the Bible teaches that we are to forgive those who are unrepentant when it comes to calling us nasty names and making all sorts of serious charges against us in a public way? Should the victims forgive such an individual who will not stop? Yes or no. It's really a simple question.

Monday, June 03, 2013 6:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you kidding me, a typo is responsible for the word hungry being changed into the word angry what about the rest of the sentence you changed. Your explination is worse than your crime, are you related to Eric holder. What a piece of work you are enabler. Sorry that was a typo I meant to say DUMBASS.

Monday, June 03, 2013 7:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

While it does say that he that does not give forgiveness shall not have it........it also says not to bear false witness against thy neighbor.

Yes all should practice forgiveness.

While its a wholesome topic--why are we talking about the Bible? Guess I'd rather see that debate than the "change", the personal attacks, and the like.

I wish things would just stick to the facts, that's what matters in the public government. But I guess people in
h€[[ want ice water.

Monday, June 03, 2013 8:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enabler get ready to defend your statements in court, since you have nothing to hide I am going to expose you. No threat fact. You should watch who you defame and continue to defame, especially a private citizen.

Monday, June 03, 2013 10:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Monday, June 03, 2013 6:59:00 AM
YES!!! The Bible teaches forgiveness. It teaches if you can't forgive God want forgive you. Ask your preacher if you don't forgive someone that calls you a bad name isn't wrong for you same as it is wrong for them to call you that.

Monday, June 03, 2013 10:17:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

CG, I haven't been involved in this discussion because I can see both sides of the issue. You have always been decent to me, so what I say, I say without malice.

I don't think you realize that you do the same thing that you accuse others of doing. The fact that you choose your wording carefully doesn't alter the meaning. Asking someone if they're stupid, or saying, in your opinion that they are acting stupid, is no different than calling them stupid. I use stupid merely as an example.

You know I am guilty of calling people names -- usually in retaliation -- quite frequently. I just come right out and call a dumbass a dumbass. I believe God doesn't differentiate between our styles. We are both calling names; yours is just worded more eloquently than mine.

I do believe we should forgive, no matter what. Lord knows it is difficult at times, and I don't always follow through. I say this as a friend, even though I don't know you. I truly hope you don't take umbrage at my post but consider it in the spirit it was written. My best to you and yours.

Ray

Monday, June 03, 2013 11:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cg is careful how he words his hateful comments where he want get sued. He does no wrong. What a laugh.
Oh how he loves the word "IF"

Monday, June 03, 2013 5:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can defend the fact that I do not willfully enable wrongdoings.

Monday, June 03, 2013 5:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:32 Go for it. That seems to be all you know.

Monday, June 03, 2013 6:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:07 about Speer He gave away the farm and then changed the EDC minutes 3 years later to try to cover it up!

Monday, June 03, 2013 7:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ch you enabling jerk have you had someone explain the difference between HUNGRY and ANGRY? Have you apologized to Barrett and everyone else fornyour inability to read and act accordingly?

Monday, June 03, 2013 7:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:23 Why are we just know hearing that? You could of posted it earlier on this thread.

Monday, June 03, 2013 8:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:35 The only enabling I know of that's going on is YOU promoting and enabling the LIE Allen Barrett told that I willfully go along with wrong. It was a lie when he told it and remains as such today.

Monday, June 03, 2013 9:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

come on cg you lied about what Barrett said and everyone saw your lie you weren't so careful with your words that time and you showed your true colors for everyone to see. I pity you for being you and not even realizing what a waste you are.

Monday, June 03, 2013 10:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:40
He lied, so stop enabling it ok?

Tuesday, June 04, 2013 9:15:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:15 What did he (who) lie about?
Was it about being hungry or angry?

Tuesday, June 04, 2013 10:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder why Barrett hasn't commented lately. It is clear that Rackley is a good man that presented facts. Barrett should get over his issues with the few families that he dislikes. It makes him seem like more of an idiot than most know he is.

When you keep barking up the wrong trees, eventually one is going to fall on you. I have no remorse for his stupid ass.

Tuesday, June 04, 2013 8:21:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Just returned to town and will respond to Mr Rackley's comments tomorrow. Because I don't spend all my time monitoring this blog doesn't mean anything other than I have a life outside this blog.

Tuesday, June 04, 2013 10:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yep 8:21, looks like he presented facts, alright. Too bad his idea of facts don't include the truth. Seems like you should be the one watching for trees to fall.

Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well 8:21 looks like Barrett's stupid ass is smarter than your dead brain.

Thursday, June 06, 2013 9:10:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

People in Pulaski Elementary School zone that want to see a change in administration at the school need to contact their board member TODAY!!! We want new leadership there and I hear Webb has until next Thursday to make needed changes. Call your board member - it is LONG overdue for change at that school.

Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I get it. Now it's Bill Holt's turn to be attacked. You people just never let up, do you?

Friday, June 07, 2013 9:13:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's right cg, they never give up.

Friday, June 07, 2013 11:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:13
State your reasons that Bill Holt should remain as principal. I don't see anywhere on this blog where he is being "attacked". He just needs to be replaced.

Friday, June 07, 2013 12:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

State your reasons why the encounter group wants Bill to go......after all, who brought this up.....AGAIN?

Friday, June 07, 2013 3:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Supervisor of Special Education is gone. Who is next?

Friday, June 07, 2013 4:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's about time. Keep bringing it on Webb.You are the man.

Friday, June 07, 2013 5:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What others are you wanting to be dismissed or fired?

Friday, June 07, 2013 7:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Webb is da man! Looks like well need another thread topic!!!

Friday, June 07, 2013 9:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:17 Out of Giles County Schools or just placed in another position?

Saturday, June 08, 2013 9:55:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I agree about Webb. Only just taken the director's job and already we appear to have a balanced budget. We may finally be on our way to a better school system.

Ray

Saturday, June 08, 2013 11:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hired another coach as assistant principal at Richland.

Saturday, June 08, 2013 8:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We appear to have a balanced budget? Think SO?

Saturday, June 08, 2013 9:55:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

8:47, according to wksr at least there is only one now. And as I said, 9:55, yes, it would appear SO. So far it looks a hell of a lot better than anything tj did.

Ray

Saturday, June 08, 2013 10:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why are the people of Elkton rejoicing?

Sunday, June 09, 2013 10:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:54 they rejoice because the tyrant has been replaced and his reign of terror has ended in Elkton, now if he just doesn't go to the hill and terrorize the whole system.

Monday, June 10, 2013 3:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hate to tell ya 3:03 but he IS going to the hill!

Monday, June 10, 2013 8:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Friday, June 07, 2013 4:17:00 PM

Read the thread of
Friday, February 22, 2013
Wheel Tax To Be Proposed In The March County Legislative Meeting

The Special Education program has wasted a huge amount of money on personal expenses including transportation to and from work for the instructors, check the last state audit.

Could that be why she is gone?
If that was wrong why did Jackson & Garner let her get away with doing it?

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Transportation Director gone too.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did he retire or get shipped out?

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He retired with help. The special ed. director should be in jail.
Gonzo is gone from Elkton, Shirey from GCHS and asst. principles dropping like flies. No more big bonuses for the principles and no more retired teachers drawing full pay and retired pay. The house is getting cleaner and the kingdoms are falling. Hooray.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:09--Learn to spell principals. Obviously, you have no principles. The principals were not receiving bonuses. This was a part of their contract. You have no idea what you are talking about on this issue.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 7:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Was the $4,000.00 not given to principals something to do about text scores. When the teachers were the ones responsible for the test scores?
7:39 are you the English professor back to comment on peoples spelling or are you cg which I always thought.
If cg had posted 6:09 he would of said it was a typo and every body better agree.

Contract or not it's GONE.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:09 What is this about retirees drawing full and retired pay?
I just didn't know that was happening and would like it explained.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:16
You were probably one of those students that did not listen well in English class and spent your time in the principal's office. You still did not do much better at spelling the second time. You are still not paying attention to what you need to know. Again, obviously, you have no principles and don't know what you are talking about on this subject.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:19

6:09 has no idea what he/she is saying.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:09

"The house is getting cleaner and the kingdoms are falling."

Are you proud of your school system resembling that of Cheatham County already? Look at the mess it is in and we are quickly approaching the same downfall. You need to put your energy into helping the system rather than giving it down the road. Great citizen you are!

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just now had time to read the post of today. Lot of bull going on.
8:36 How can we help the school system? I'm not trying to be ugly or cute like some of the post I've read, just want to know what I can do that will help.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jackson was giving some retired teachers 120 day contracts then another when that ended so that they were actually working full time at the same time they were drawing full retirement payments.
Some times the only way to help a system is to rebuild it from the ground up, that's the only thing that can possibly help this school system.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:41 Thanks for answering my post about full and retirement pay.

To think there are greedy people out there and children finish college and can't get a job, when they could retire and leave openings..

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:18:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If one is still doing a good job, why would you want a person to retire? It was just as hard for the older person to get a job as it is for the younger one seeking a job now. I agree that there are some that do need to retire, but to lump all of those still working and doing a good job is not fair to them. Those kind of comments are as hurting and demeaning as other hurtful comments. You don't realize until you are there in that situation. Be kind. We all need a little kindness.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I overheard today at the park that Dr. Webb is moving inot the new building of the central office. All others are moving around in the building as well. New maze, new dangers.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is that gossip?
hahaha

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nope, no gossip. Truth.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, so it's truth when you guys repeat hearsay and gossip when those you disagree with do the same thing? Can you see any hypocrisy there?

Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:37:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

To 7:27 The issue was never about if a person is still doing a good job wanting them to retire. The problem is that some who were already retired were being brought back to the school system under the guise of a temporary
job, yet being kept as full time and paid a full salary in addition to their retired salaries. If the person wanted to continue teaching there was no problem with that decision but you can't do both have a full time teaching job while drawing full retired teacher benefits.

I congratulate Dr. Webb on the changes he's made thus far and the efforts to actually have a balanced budget.

Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No hearsay about earlier post. Mrs. Cindy Young was promoted at the Central Office and gained a new office next door to the Director. Mrs. Braden has been placed in what amounts to a closet. The Doctor has moved into her office. Seems that Mr. Shirey is going to be the assistant director in a few days. Check for your self.

Thursday, June 13, 2013 5:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know what you call a closet but Mrs. Braden's office is not a closet. It is the same size as the one next door and bigger than Mrs. Youngs. I went to the Central Office Friday and Mrs. Young is still in the same office. How do you folks hear all of this?

Friday, June 14, 2013 6:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just wait...

Friday, June 14, 2013 9:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

spies

Saturday, June 15, 2013 7:41:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Was Mrs. Braden's office not Jackson's office and wouldn't the Director be due it? Just wondering.

Saturday, June 15, 2013 8:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jackson had an office in the old building. He never moved inot to new building. Braden was in the new building in the corner office. Doc wants the nice office. It's his I guess. Spies in training. CIA, FBI, TBI, PPD. All spies.

Saturday, June 15, 2013 10:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

More pink slips today in certified mail to the 120 day people. More layoffs to come.

Saturday, June 15, 2013 5:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The problem with some of the changes is that NO ONe has been told what is going on in the school system. Only the board members (making the calls) are aware of these actions. When did they meet to talk about all these changes, firings and layoffs?

Saturday, June 15, 2013 5:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now all of this is fine and dandy if he's going to promote good people from within (so far not seeing good judgment with the promotion of Gonzo). But if he is going to bring in unknowns friends of his....

Saturday, June 15, 2013 9:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WARNING!!! Don't let yourselves be duped by the likes of Tim Webb! He is a wolf in sheep's clothing who is incompetent and unprofessional. Let's consider a sample of his past performance (particularly in Cheatham County).

Autocratic: had a divide and conquer "leadership" method to see who is loyal to him (i.e. making people reapply for their jobs once he was hired).

Bully: had people scared for their jobs to the point where their personalities changed. It wasn't that change was "too fast and overwhelming" for the community's "tolerance level" at his last director's job (as he told Jackson County's BOE during an interview); it was his bullying that was intolerable.

Lazy: hardly a "workaholic" as he described himself (to the Jackson BOE), Webb was hardly ever in the office or in the schools, left others to pick up the slack while trying to take credit. Likes to take credit for winning Race to the Top when it wasn't due to any of his hard work at the state level either.

Dereliction of Duty: Did not conduct evaluations of principals as required by laws that were passed to win Race to the Top (while he was the commissioner no less), then arbitrarily demoted principals who he failed to evaluate during 2011-2012 as director of Cheatham County Schools. Three lawsuits are currently pending due to his neglect of duty.

PLAGIARISM: copied a letter word-for-word that was written by a superintendent in another county and passed it off as his own for inclusion in an employee handbook.

Cronyism: terminated capable and competent employees, then replaced them with friends at significantly higher salaries (sometimes as much as $20K more).

Conflict of Interest: Webb even hired his GIRLFRIEND as an assistant principal, and she "worked" under him while he was the director of schools in 2011-2012.

No CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS were performed for some of the people Webb hired, including a principal who works among students.

Apathy for Students: Far from being "student-focused" and "student-centered" (as he claimed while interviewing with the Jackson BOE), Webb took no interest in students as individuals; he never involved himself in any activities among the students, schools, families, or the Cheatham County community (which found him to be unapproachable and inaccessible).
-- When a student was bullied, the complaints of bullying were ignored, and the student committed SUICIDE. Tim Webb wasn't even kind enough to offer his condolences to the child's family, yet Webb went to extreme lengths to try to protect himself and the schools from any hint of liability.

Disregard for Employees: ignored civil rights complaints, fired teachers and staff on a whim (often disregarding due process rights), childishly settled personal vendettas by firing people (via mailed termination letters) during his last days as director of schools in Cheatham County.

If Tim Webb is hired, the board will be faced with having to search for a new superintendent in about two years. Once he leaves, others will be faced with picking up the pieces. Consider his most recent record: about two years as commissioner, 18 months in Cheatham County, and then he applied to be a superintendent in Jackson County in December when he had just started a new job as principal at the beginning of this school year. Of course he withdrew his application for that position after wasting the Jackson BOE's time.

The community deserves a superintendent who is willing to make a true commitment to students and the community. But once again, Tim Webb is simply looking for a school system to provide him with a paycheck and a pedestal. If you want an egomaniac who is neither good, honest, or fair, hire Tim Webb.

Saturday, June 15, 2013 10:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ASHLAND CITY, TN (WSMV) - Racy photos, suggestive messages and alleged school politics are creating a stir inside Cheatham County Schools. Now, a husband and wife working as educators are claiming they've been framed for a series of accusations, and they said they know why.

"We're just kinda stunned by it," said Dale McCarver, a drama teacher at Sycamore High. "Since this regime took over a little over a year ago, I've been extremely vocal against them, their hiring decisions and how they spend money. My suspicion is this is all related as a sort of political payback for those criticisms, and the questions I keep asking."

According to charges filed with the school system, while working as a special education supervisor in 2006, Crystal McCarver sent several pictures of herself in underwear to a man applying to be a special education teacher. In an instant message conversation, McCarver is accused of hinting the applicant should engage in sexual activity with both she and her husband.

"Those pictures are of my wife," Dale McCarver said. "Some of the pictures I took myself and are on Facebook and in the family album. The chat is even more upsetting, and I don't understand any of that."

"I don't know who that person is that's using the chat name," Crystal McCarver said. "The name that is listed there, I don't know who that is or where that information came from. It's not me."

The applicant ended up working in Cheatham County Schools for the next five years following the 2006 incident and claims McCarver made the environment hostile for him, eventually voting on a committee to have him dismissed. The accusations first came out last October, but the McCarvers said they thought the matter was resolved.

"The allegations were completely false," Crystal McCarver said.

Friday, Dr. Tim Webb dismissed both Dale and Crystal McCarver on his last day as superintendent of Cheatham County Schools.

"I have no idea why that would be coming back up other than because of my husband's political questions against Dr. Webb and the school board," Crystal McCarver said.

According to termination letters, Crystal McCarver was let go for failing to disclose information that led to hostile work environment charges. Meanwhile, Dale McCarver was dismissed for conduct and for taking school equipment that endangered students and faculty. His personnel file includes an incident where he removed emergency exit lighting from the Sycamore High theater where he taught.

Cheatham County Schools declined to comment on the case, including the McCarver's allegations against the school and Webb. Webb did not return calls for comment.

Saturday, June 15, 2013 10:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Barrett
The above post is a perfect example of what I and others have suggested to you about the volatility of this filthy blog. I firmly believe that one day this blog is going to be the cause of some very serious problems. When that day come, you sir, must bear a large part of the blame.
I'm reminded of what you said concerning personal attacks on others. If that post doesn't personally attack Dr. Webb, then what would you call it? I trust that, to avoid the appearance of hypocrisy, you will delete this post immediately. Let's see if you will.

Sunday, June 16, 2013 6:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When was this on WSM news? Can they be sued for telling it?

Sunday, June 16, 2013 7:12:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Will you hold WSMV to the same standard you are holding Barrett to? Mr. Webb is Director of schools in charge of millions of tax dollars and the lives of over a thousand citizens if that don't make him a public figure please explain what a public figure is? I hope Barrett don't delete these comments they need to be discussed.

Sunday, June 16, 2013 8:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see personal attacks about Obama all the time.

Sunday, June 16, 2013 3:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:38 But the Harwells and Janet are privileged people. No one should say anything about them. There was nothing wrong with Terry saying what he did about Hughes and Barrett at the Chili Cook Off.

Saturday, June 22, 2013 11:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:08
Busy, busy, and busier I see. You seem so full of hatred for the Harwells and Mrs. Vanzant that it makes me think you are Barrett posting anonymously. Oh, I forgot. He never does that. What a joke.

Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Joke is on you sister.

Sunday, June 23, 2013 7:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Always the last word, eh?

Sunday, June 23, 2013 8:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

May I have the last WORD, children?

Sunday, June 23, 2013 9:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who is really in charge at the Board of Education? the Board seems to be wheeling and dealing to their drum beat. Webb on a string. Cindy Young moving into number two spot as her husband is chairman of the Board. No politics? Right!

Monday, June 24, 2013 6:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look, Mike Young is a good man who doesn't have any say into who gets what at the Central Office. Why don't you stop with the jealousy and hating? Think about where it's coming from and refuse to be a part of it. Hatred, jealousy, and resentment are just as contagious as kindness and respect for your fellow man.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013 6:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:02
Who will be next on you guys' list? Let's see, Terry Harwell and Mrs. Vanzant have just had their turns. Who comes after Mike? I'd bet it will be one of the commissioners you people have your sights on. Pathetic.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013 6:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When you paint a bulls eye on your forehead, you should expect someone to take a shot at you. That is exactly what ole "I'm a commissioner, what are you going to do about it" did; he deserves whatever he gets.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013 3:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:24
Don't hate. We already have a miserable little man here in the county who is doing enough of that for all of us.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013 4:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hate has nothing to do with it. It's all about ownership.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lawrence County News

School system support and skilled trade staff were given a one and a quarter percent raise
Posted on June 24, 2013

School system support and skilled trade staff were given a one and a quarter percent raise at a special called session of the School Board Thursday evening. Support staff members include aides and office personnel while skilled trade staff are employees holding degrees or extra training that qualify them to do their jobs, such as school nurses. The raise will
add 116 thousand dollars to the school system’s 2013-14 budget. The board also approved a bid for insurance from local provider Elliott and Associates that includes a policy to cover students in the event of an accident at school. Schools Director, Dr. Bill Heath said he is scheduled to present the Board’s proposed building plan to the County Commission’s budget committee in mid-July. The Board is requesting 2.3 million of a projected cost of 65 million dollars this coming year to complete planning
and land acquisition.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A miserable little man here in the county appears to describe cg to a tee.

Saturday, July 27, 2013 9:48:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Suck it, cg. No one is forcing you to peruse this "filthy blog." The tone of your posts indicate that nothing would make you happier than for something to happen to someone that you could blame on the blog. A fine christian gentleman you are. What a piece of work. If God knows what's in your heart, you are in serious trouble.

Monday, July 29, 2013 3:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:16 That is what I've been thinking.
Also cg must be miserable the way she likes to start something on the blog.

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Miserable and somewhat unbalanced, mentally. It's not normal to harbor that much resentment on a constant basis. He probably kicks his dog when he's in a bad mood.

Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:10:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home