Another Huge Lawsuit Filed IN Connection With Actions Of EDB/IDC
This time the lawsuit is directed at a very prestigious law
firm that has resulted from the actions of the leadership of the Industrial
Development Group. Filed on 11 October
2013 it charges malpractice and conflict of interest.
posted by Allen Barrett | 5:21 PM
43 Comments:
Your lawyer?
Barrett didnt use the same lawyer who is retained by the EDC/IDB. Anyways thats past so wouldnt make any difference. You need to be looking at why another law suit instead of petty remarks about Barrett. Must be The Enabler at work again.
What difference does "past" make! Doesn't bother Barrett to bring up old post! If he can't stand the heat the the hell out of the kitchen!
There are no such entities as an EDB or IDC. There goes Barrett's Pulitzer.
11:06
No so. Besides, Enabler is the lie allen barrett told. Accept it, and stop bringing it up.
I'm not 11:06 but I read this blog and I never saw a lie told on you, just the one you keep repeating, that you are not an enabler and that mean ol' Barrett lied on you.
2:54
Then with all due respect, the post didn't concern you, did it? He lied, and I don't think he should get away with it. Seems you are enabling that lie.
It seems that being an enabler is worse to ch than being stupid. Well at least he has something to compare that he knows about.
Enabler is a lie that Allen Barrett told. That's right, Allen Barrett told a lie and will not repent of it. What about that?
I see the enabler is already up lying and whining.
Please ignore cg and let a blog be discussed without it being about her.
You know how he is and it's not worth talking about.
Why can't we stop all the silly post, they aren't as cute as you might think.
What did the lawyer do to get a lawsuit against him/her?
Did something the EDB/IDC do that caused it or was the lawyer not as smart as they thought?
Did it have something to do with using the money to pay a lawyer from the sale of mortage property have something to do with it?
If something was done wrong that tax payers have to pay for we deserve to know.
You can't represent both sides and use that information against one of the sides. Everything points to Speer and company as trying to bully more into submission.
Actually, this points away from Speer.
8:14
I see that YOU are enabling the lie Allen Barrett told. He knows he lies but pride won't allow him to repent of it. Apparently, your pride won't allow you to let it go either.
If there is no reason to repent, why do it?
You can continue to deny and call me names but the facts speak more loudly than your personal slanted opinion. Show some facts, I showed mine about your actions. If I lied prove it with evidence that disproves the abundant amount of evidence I presented showing why I referred to you as an enabler. So far all you've done is whine about your feelings being hurt.
Show some facts.
Poor Poor CG the Enabler he is hated by everyone and he is crying
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
1:53
You want to play this game all over again? Ok; let me say it again. Enabler is a lie Allen Barrett told on me because he couldn't accept the fact that a Christian would not willfully go along with wrongdoings. Perhaps he can, but I can't. In addition, a gentleman is not one who would be on a pubic forum calling people nasty names and accusing them of things most of which he can't prove to begin with. To do that is to sow strife and discord.
Now, as for "everyone" hating me, I just had to laugh. As I have said, if God be for us then who can be against us? I have plenty of family and friends who do not hate me. For that I have joy in my life. I hope you can say the same for yourself. I would also hope that you could consider the real source of your anger and hatred and turn from it. We just don't need that here.
CG the Enabler... you just don't get it. I post a jab at you and you fall for it like a hungry Bass. I am making fun of you and your insecurity and it works every time. 14 words makes you see red and have to defend yourself.
Again, Poor, Poor CG the Enabler he just can't stand that everyone hates him or that anyone is opposed to him. CG has to be right (in his mind he is) and anyone who says that he is wrong, an idiot, warped, self imposed, self loving, is against humanity and GOD.
You are an easy target and boy do I love hunting. Because your responses are so predictable.
You are an idiot, by responding to my poking fun at you proves my position.
5:52
Well, here we are again. What an unpleasant surprise!
I fully realize what you are doing, so don't flatter yourself. I'm just bull-headed enough that I will not let your silliness go unchecked.
Let me repeat what I keep telling you. Enabler is a lie Allen Barrett told on me because he refused to accept the fact that I am a Christian and that a Christian would never willfully go along with wrongdoings. He might, but I won't. Furthermore, a true gentleman like myself would never get on a public forum and call people nasty names and try to cause hurt. He does, but I don't.
Idiot or not, as long as you insist on playing this game, I will call your hand to it. I'm pretty sure that Barrett wouldn't want the public to be reminded that he is not always honest. After all, he's clearly lying about me.
Everyone hates me? Thank God, you are wrong about that.
To 5:15 I have never called you a "nasty" name and I challenge you to show one such instance where I did. I certainly have called you some uncomfortable name, intentionally in an effort to get your attention to a point of changing your support of certain wrong behaviors. I have not referred to anyone by any name that did not fit the behavior and actions they were involved in and each of those names were accompanied by carefully documented reasons. Want to criticize me that's fine but to have any credibility you should include at lease a smidgen of support for that criticism.
Barrett..
Oh yes, you have called me a host of names over the past couple of years, but I wouldn't characterize any of them as actually being nasty. But I suppose it depends on what nasty means to you as opposed to me.
I have provided you with a wealth of support for my criticisms of you. I think you are just too arrogant to objectively look at your behavior. That's sad.
Maybe I don't understand you say Barrett called you nasty names then when called on it you say he didn't really call you nasty names just a lot of names. I also read where you said that you never argued about if Barrett was wrong about things but your problem was how he treated people but you have called him a liar. You sure are a confusing person.
10:14
I just stated above that Barrett has over the past couple of years called me a variety of names. But I never said he has called me "nasty" names. What I SAID is that he has called others nasty names. To me, nasty doesn't necessarily mean vulgar. Ok?
Yes, I have called Barrett a liar because of the lie he told on me. And he did lie about that. Perhaps it's insignificant to you, but one professing to be a Christian should not tell lies.
I don't know how to make what I'm trying to say to you any clearer.
You are so perfect you can't forgive, you have to bring up something happen in the pass over and over.
Do you live by the old Testament, "an eye for an eye?"
Try reading the new testament sometime about praying for those that have wronged you instead of whining.
5:52
Look, I'm not the one who brought up this lie again. It was either you or your buddy...not sure. But regardless, just stop enabling the lie, and I will not say another word about it. Ok?
Thanks for the compliment about my being so perfect, but I am far from that. I'm flattered.
Interesting that you would mention Bible teaching on those who despitefully use us and about forgiveness. I too have thrown that idea out there on more than one occasion, and my comments were met with nothing but ridicule from one or perhaps two of you guys. What a shame. Oh, and your fearless leader once said when ridiculing me about this idea, how do you know I don't pray for you guys? Do you have anything else?
I'll be honest enabler. Something you have a very hard time with so I hope you aren't praying for us because you are so confused you don't even know what god you are praying to.
10:01
Enabler is a lie Allen Barrett told on me out of spite, because he would not accept as "proof" that I am a Christian and a gentleman. That's his problem and not mine, but you seem to be enabling the lie he told.
The last time I heard, Christians worship the true and living God. Like it or not, that's how it is. He is my God. If I were as judgmental as you seem to be, I would suggest that you likewise get to know Him.
And be a sick distorted individual like you. You are nothing more than a liar and an enabler so why would any one take your advice? And are you sure God is a he? Show me tthe passage where the Bible identifies the gender of God.
12:02
Enabler is a lie Allen Barrett told on me, and I've already explained that to you.
So now you want to argue that God might be a she? Are you nuts? Why would Christ refer to God as His Father? What about that? My Heavenly Father???
And you call me sick?
Even Barrett would disagree with you on the possibility of God being a female. What a laugher.
I have know what I thought was good Christian man doing things that are wrong. I was mislead like a lot of other people were. Therefore just saying you are a Christian don't hold water with me.
Christians are only human like everyone else. They make mistakes.
Actions helps you know if they are good Christians or not. Bench warmers don't prove it.
2:09
You know nothing about my service to God. And this blog surely proves that just because one calls himself a Christian doesn't make it so. A Christian would never be guilty of calling people names and of trying to hurt them.
Guess ole Paul, John and Jesus was just gud ole boys having fun cause they sure did call some names in their time. If I remember right Jesus even got a little more than upset down at the church one day.
5:13
And you are right; they did get upset and call people such names as vipers and heathen, but you and I both know that was not in the same context. They were trying to convict men of their sins and were pleading with them to repent. I don't see any of you guys doing that. You guys call names and try to hurt people. That's not right. Can you see the difference?
3:07 You just proved my point, I know nothing about your service to God, so just your saying so proves nothing.
Are you saying some of the things you say about WAB isn't trying to hurt him? I know nothing about WAB's service to God and have said nothing against or for him. Just pointing out how you act.
5:41 They were trying to convict the men of their sins? Were they going to send them to jail?
5:45
Don't think so. It was people like Paul and Silas who went to jail for trying to convict the sinners of their sins. Thank God we can't be sent to jail for trying to get troublemakers to stop what they are doing.
Could we get back to the topic of this thread?
I want to know more about this lawsuit.
Do you think this attorney might have done something that caused this whole lawsuit? Is that possible?
5:01 Could it be possible? Who was the attorney, will we ever know?
Post a Comment
<< Home