Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Can Anyone Justify The Head Of TVA Making 3.6 Million Last Year?

Just two years after TVA buried 400 acres under a coal ash spill that resulted in millions of dollars to clean up TVA handed out over 94 million dollars in bonuses this year. The top 90 executives averaged over $120,000.00 each, the non-executives will get an average of $6,917.00 each.
Tom Kilgore head of TVA was paid $3.6 million dollars for the fiscal year that ended in September 2010 making him the highest paid federal employee in the country. Next year he will be eligible for another $200,000 added to that salary.
Now in addition to these very lucrative bonuses salaried employees are scheduled to receive a 2.9% raise this fall.
While consumers struggle to pay their ever increasing electric bills it seems those at the other end of the power line are doing very well, very well indeed.

137 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Any suggestions on what we can do to stop this from happening.They are controling the monopoly and we need the product.We use less and they raise the rate keeping their income the same.I am sitting in the dark right now with a heavy sweetsuit on because thermostat is set at 58.still have a high bill we can barely pay.What else can we do to lower our bill?

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What benefits do our PES board get?
Are they the same board that we had all the problems with a couple of years ago?

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah I have a suggestion. Don't continue to support Democrat candidates. VOTE TEA PARTY REPUBLICANS, and start demanding that these federal employees have their high paid wings clipped.
This has always been the problem with federal jobs.
They don't have to do anything but be employed by the state or the feds, and they're on a gravy train for the duration of their lives.
WE in the private sector have been living with downsized companyies, staff, and income for too long now.
Yet the Government continues every year with giving out bonuses and cost of living pay increases.
I haven't had a pay increase in 10 years. And if I raise my prices, I loose business.
NOT THE FED though!

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:02 We should include the county along with the other government entities you mention - county, state, federal. All seem to be removed from what people in the private sector are dealing with.

Locally, maybe we could start with our local PES board. Start from the bottom up letting them know it has to stop and they need to take the message to their TVA meetings. We could start with presenting a petition and presenting that to the board. Anyone know the date and time of their next meeting? If we get a petition together then we need people to show up for the meeting. Dont leave it to the minor few. Strength in numbers dont forget.

PES board members are the same as what we had a couple of years ago, except for Dan Speer who is now replaced by Pat Ford, of course. BTW, PES board members receive a pension paid for by the rate payers. Is it any wonder Speer never changed the members? This too needs to change.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:16:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh yeah: we can't forget the pensions now can we.
What? These valued few show up once a month for a meeting that last maybe and hour; they get paid and then get a pension on top of that? Who on earth but another creepy politician would come up with a thing like this?
Certainly needs to be changed. If they want to serve, then let them serve for what it is they do and nothing more.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:02. You cat be THAT misinformed. You realize, of course, republicans control the TVA Board. Don't you?

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regardless of what political party controls the TVA board, these outlandish salaries and bonuses MUST be stopped! So what are we going to do about it except complain amongst ourselves. Anyone have any thoughts on where we start and will you all get involved?

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:44:00 PM

Oh really? Can you tell me their names, oh great informed one, so that we can varify their party affiliation?
But it really doesn't matter what they call themselves. You have to look at what they do. Ever heard of a "RINO"? New York mayor Bloomberg is one. And in fact, Bush 1 was another. Some even consider Bush 2 a RINO, and they would be right in some regard.
Now that you've been brought up to speed on what constitutes a Conservative Republican
you can consider yourself better educated sweetheart!

Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:24
Must you be so arrogant and condescending? Everybody is not as smart as you seem to think you are. It must be fruustrating to live among illiterate and small-minded people.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 6:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:24. You don't know??? And you posted your drivel about democrats anyway. Typical, I suppose.

When the salaries were approved, TVA had 5 directors. All republican. All appointed by Bush.

Please do a little homework before you post such erroneous information in the future.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:00:00 AM

Excuse me madam, but I do believe it was YOU who proposed that I was; as you said "misinformed",as to who had power over TVA. I was simply making you aware of just how loose those lables have become.
And no I don't have to be so arragant when I respond to you sweetness. But I do so enjoy it as you so well know by now.
As to your second post which followed next in the blog; it appears that I must direct you to re read my post concerning party affilliaton. Obviously you were much to dense to understand it the first time you read it. So please read it again very slowly and breath in deeply as you read.
And yes I am insinuating that the Democrat party base is made up of small minded people who are too busy watching Oprah, and dancing with the stars. They have no idea as to how the world really works, and they tend to look to their filthy rich politician GODS for government hand outs.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:12:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Apparently Tea Party Republicans watched Dancing with the Stars....Sara Palin's daughter Bristol (who was one of the worst of the worst dancers) went all the way to the top four on Tea Party Republicans voting. And apparently Oprah is doing something right.....are you a little jealous of her influence and wealth!!! I vote Republican in 75% of elections, I did not vote for Obama, and as a citizen of the United States I find your comments demeaning to the people of this nation!!! You are a classic example of what is wrong with this nation...you would cut off your nose to not cross over political lines to work for the betterment of our country!!!!! WOW.....

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Sara Palin's daughter Bristol (who was one of the worst of the worst dancers)"
Like I give a Rat's rear end about that? You have just proven my point my dear.
And No I am not jealous of Oprah and her wealth. Your the one who brought that up. Good for her! I'm proud that she's done well. I really wish that everyone could do as well. But you seem to be mighty proud of it. Why? Does she send you a check every so often?
My bottom line is simply this ( and of course you didn't seem to catch it): most of the people in this country have their priorities in the wrong place. They'd sooner trust someone who's been slickly packaged to run our coutry and personal life, for them, provided that is, as long as they are touting some touchy feely thing, and talk about the children. Meanwhile they do little to address the problems they tout, but it's ok cause at least they're trying: right? And then they wonder why things got so screwed up. That is until the CMA awards come on, and then it's back to a life of blissful ignorance.
This nation can no longer afford this type of lazy self induced stupidity.
I hope I've cleared this up for you.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought you were talking about the TVA board of directors who you wrongfully called democrats, even though all 5 who approved the salary are republican.

THAT was your bottom line until you changed it. You know, laying around all day watching and believing Fox News ain't that great a way of life either.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:19,

You are the most ignorant blogger on this site. Your hate radiates from every word out of your mouth. I bet the people who "have" to be around you are miserable because of you!!! This quote fits you perfectly.......

There are two types of people - those who come into a room and say, "Well, here I am!" and those who come in and say, "Ah, there you are." ~Frederick L. Collins

It is so sad because I truly feel sorry for you because of your attitude.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 6:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2010 4:41:00 PM

Spoken like a true commie lib DEMOCRAP.
By the way sugar; where is your eveidence those TVA directors you love to refer to as "REPUBLICANS" are even as you say? So what that a Republican nominated them? That dosn't make them so, or even conservative for that matter!
And who's to say that these salaries and bonuses are the result of those who are now serving? You don't know do you. Your just making stuff up as you go.
I found their names on line, but it is nowhere to be found just which party they belong to. If your attempting to match "Whitt's" with me, your on the "loosing" end again I'm afraid.
You'll have to do better than that "V".
Oh but what the heck. Come on and dazzle us some more with your stupendous lack of mental powers babe.
Perhaps you can tell us more about Oprah.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:50:00 PM

I gotta quote that fits you perfectly too:

Stupid is as Stupid does.
Grocho Marks.
Now go put that in your pipe and smoke on it! Enabler of all EVIL.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

real intelligent. I guess when you get called out accurately, there really is nothing more you can say.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:44
Hey, wait just a minute. I am not 6:50, but I am the one you and the promoter of strife love to call an enabler. You seem very confused. I suppose you've had another glass of the kool-aid.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 6:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is not kool aid you are drinking.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 6:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:36:

The more you blog the more stupid you sound. It must be awesome to be such a legend in "YOUR OWN MIND"
Cannot understand if you think so much of yourself and all your wisdom why you won't put your name on your blogs so we can all know the almighty person who is posting!!! Could it be that you really know what a small insignificant person you really are with your "Hitler" beliefs! Again, I so pity you and "especially" the people around you!

Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:07 (wab)?
Why don't you sign your name?

Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:48:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

To 3:48
If I write anything on this blog I do put my name on it and you know that. Of course that's one of the things that separates us your cowardice that causes you to hid in the dark closet and make all sorts of vicious claims with your gossip and perverted self-righteousnesses. You have a nice insignificant life now, you hear.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
Oh, make no mistake about it; my life is quite significant. I have family and friends who love me. I have a good relationship with the Lord, and I am enjoying good health. I don't go around trying to cause trouble, and I'm very content with most things. Are you?
I noticed you just had to call me a name. Does that make you feel "significant"?

Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If barrett is not name-calling, he's not posting. It makes up for every failure he has endured I suppose. Losing an election so badly and then being trounced in court could make someone feel insignificant. So let's give him some slack when he projects his sell-image on others.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 6:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:31:

There is no way that you love anyone (especially the Lord) because you spout so much hate for everyone!!!! I am sure that your negativity for life affects the people around you!!!! Again such a sad life!!!! I hope for you that you do find peace!!

Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:50,

Read your own blog....then talk about whose negativity affect the people around them!!!! It is not just WAB!!! Next time you decide to blog...pray!

Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Webster dictionary meaning:

in·sig·nif·i·cant (nsg-nf-knt)
adj.
1. Not significant, especially:
a. Lacking in importance; trivial.
b. Lacking power, position, or value; worthy of little regard.
c. Small in size or amount.
2. Having little or no meaning

Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What was the name Barrett called you in his 4:37 entry< I must have missed it. Maybe it's just another example of you blaming Barrett for something that he didn't do. I agree he referred to you in a negative way but there was no name called there. Just so you don't feel slighted you're a mean spirited idiot.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:12
Have another glass of Kool-Aid, would you?
I stand by every word I said at 5:31. Furthermore, I don't need your approval of my life and any relationships I have, and particularly with the Lord.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:45 Well, let's see. I reviewed the 4:37 post by the pos, and I noticed that he called someone a coward. Other names that I notced are perverted, self-righteous, and gossip. Or would you try to excuse him by saying he was describing behaviors?

Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:14:00 PM, Guess what! Mr. Barrett does'nt need your approval either! Have a nice day.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:21 Do you know the difference between an adjective and a noun and yes he was describing behavior.
Saying someone is acting dumb is not the same as saying he is dumb, most of my sixth graders know that.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Better tell those youngsters that "dumb" too is an adjective.

Thursday, December 02, 2010 11:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:14
If you don't need anyone's approval, why does Barrett need yours?
Just wondering.

Friday, December 03, 2010 2:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:01
I didn't know he did? I personally don't think he seeks the approval of anyone other than himself.

10:48
As near as I can remember, an adjective describes a noun. Am I right on that?
Anyhow, wouldn't barrett's reference to cowardice imply that I'm a coward? Did he not refer to me as a gossip? How about perverted self-righteousness? Please enlighten me as to what the implication of that might be.

Friday, December 03, 2010 6:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:07:

Have you ever gave a thought to that it may not "just" be WAB that thinks you are a "hater" and "insignificant"?? Please realize that when you spout all this negaivity it shows the person "you are"....not the person someone else(WAB) is! Have a blessed day!!!

Friday, December 03, 2010 8:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Getting back to the subject, let us all remember the news stories, talking about how TVA "has no choice" but to pass these increased costs on to the consumer. They will absolutely, never consider cutting back pay and pay raises in order to absorb some of the increased costs, it always falls on the backs of the little guys like us, who pay for those increased salaries. It's criminal if you ask me. And it will never change.

Friday, December 03, 2010 9:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:35:00 AM

Well according to the "enabler of all Evil", they shouldn't have to cut back on anything. They're entitled cause they're "Special". The rest of us aren't, and it's our job to shut up and fork over that money, so they can continue unabated in their self glorified life style.
Hey someone has to pay for it. And a little tax increase is not too much to ask. After all this Nation is just so rich. Right?

Friday, December 03, 2010 5:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:16
Would you stop telling that lie? I do not promote nor condone any evil activities.
Please allow me to tell you what I DO consider evil. Here are some that come to mind. How about feet that are swift to mischief, a proud look, a lying tongue, and those who sow strife and discord? Does that sound like anyone we know? What about those who run around town trying to stir up trouble, call names, and make all manner of accusations? Lastly, what about the hate-mongerer, the spiteful, and the envious? Those things seem pretty evil to me. And you want to call me an enabler of such stuff. No, I simply plead that they stop.

Friday, December 03, 2010 7:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:00 sounds like you.

Saturday, December 04, 2010 8:52:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm totally pissed about the whole thing! We are warm in our homes in summer, cold in our homes in winter and this guy gets that much TAXPAYER money. This is a total outrage. We conserve and they spend like crazy.
And another thing.. you people please stay on the topic..how hard is that?

Saturday, December 04, 2010 10:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's our problem:

The TVA Board That Operates Like A Business
Not to put too partisan of a spin on things here, but when the inspector general issues a report questioning TVA’s regulatory compliance and management practices, and one remembers that the TVA Board of Directors “sets policy and strategy for TVA,” one should also remember the recent changes to the TVA Board, which make it for all intents and purposes a Republican operation.

As for the rest of the board , in the grand Republican tradition of “operating government like a business” it is made up of Republican donors and patrons:

Most of those appointed to the TVA board over the past two years by President Bush have been Republican activists and financial supporters of GOP causes. Robert “Mike” Duncan from Kentucky is chairman of the Republican National Committee, and Susan Richardson Williams, who is awaiting confirmation for another term, was previously chairwoman of the Tennessee Republican Party. TVA Chairman Bill Sansom, a Knoxville businessman, served in the Cabinet of U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., when Sen. Alexander was Tennessee’s governor.

Collectively, the eight people appointed or nominated to the TVA board by the Bush White House, and their spouses, gave $592,405 to Republican candidates and organizations since 1994, according to a Chattanooga Times Free Press compilation of campaign records. Four of the board appointees also contributed lesser amounts to Democratic candidates.

The GOP tilt to the new board is one of the unintended consequences of adopting the TVA board change without congressional hearings in 2004, Mr. Crowell said.

“All the board members will now be of the same political party, which I don’t think reflects the diversity of opinion in the Tennessee Valley,” he said. “There also appears to be a lot of importance put in these appointments to where people live, which encourages them to represent those areas and not the broader interests of TVA.”

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"“All the board members will now be of the same political party, "which I don’t think reflects the diversity of opinion"
“There also appears to be a lot of importance put in these appointments"

Key phrases here are; "I don't think", "appers to be", and of course lets not forget, "diversity of opinion".

Alot of nefarious "speculation", with NO evidence of wrong doing.But those caught up in brain wasting exercices like watching "Dancing with the Stars", and listening to Democrap candidates are just the kinds of things their typical voter base will go for everytime.

Typical low level operative at work here: regurjitating the Democrap talking points.
Just like a Commie lib enabler.

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's one way to spin it.

Another is recognize the fact that republicans control TVA and are operating it just like a wall street utility, with similar pay structures.

We are all free to look at it either way.

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:27:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can Anyone Justify The Head Of TVA Making 3.6 Million Last Year?

Apparently, 11:22 can.

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Better yet lets look at it this way; There are several appointments seving as board members that many "Feel" are Republican supporters. While there is no direct evidence for that, and it may or may not make a dimes worth of difference as to why they supported the pay raises and bonuses; they should have to be questioned as to why they approved these pay increases, in such a severe economic downturn.

And why is there no investigative journalist looking into this? Perhaps if there is enough outrage over it, then maybe there could be congressional investigations into it?

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:37:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:34:00 AM

No I can't justify it. But claiming that because they're "republicans" doesn't explain it either; because REAL conservative Republicans (and I stress "real conservatives") wouldn't do something like that!
But of course, a "RINO" would. Which means they are DEMOCRAPS at heart. Suck on that won't you.

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:42 I don't have a dog in this fight, but in reading the above posts, it is clear to me that you might enjoy more credibility if you stopped the name calling and the adolescent taunts.

Saturday, December 04, 2010 1:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Any ideas on how WE THE PEOPLE can create enough public outrage to get this investigated.I don't think any public offical is worth 3.6 million dollars per year regardless of what their job might be.Does anyone know who TVA customers need to contact to get this injustice corrected.Does anyone know how to get this info to the attention of the news mediaso that all TVA customers will be aware of this and can lodge a complaint?

Saturday, December 04, 2010 5:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:45
Why don't you ask allen barrett? He seems to know which screws to turn to get something stirred up.

Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Talk about "adolecent taunts"!
There goes the enabler again.
Lets just ignore her. Ok?

Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:54
Gender confusion and drinking the Kool-Aid is not a healthy mix.
Who is the "us" in let's? What a laugh.

Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:39
you can bet that it doesn't include trolls like you

Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:26
Have another glass of the kool-aid and fuel that hatred and jealousy. Hook, Line and Sinker Syndrome?

Monday, December 06, 2010 5:48:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

These are the members of the TVA Board and the president that nominated them.

(B) Dennis Bottorff Chairman
(O) Marilyn A. Brown
(B) Mike Duncan
(B) Tom Gilliland .
(B) William Graves
(O) Barbara S. Haskew
(O) Neil G. McBride
(O) William B. Sansom
(B) Howard Thrailkill

These are the ways to contact the TVA Board

Mail:
TVA Board of Directors
400 West Summit Hill Drive
WT-7B
Knoxville, TN 37902

Phone: (865) 632-4000

Email:
tvainfo@tva.gov or board@tva.gov

These are the member of the
"Finance, Rates, and Portfolio Committee"
Howard Thrailkill (Chair)
Thomas Gilliland
Dennis Bottorff

I urge everyone who is interested in this topic to flood this office with your concerns and thoughts about these pay increases and bonus along with the rates. Remember to be courteous and brief.

Monday, December 06, 2010 10:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I sent two emails today about the high pay and electric rates, I hope everybody will send lots of emails and calls.

Monday, December 06, 2010 5:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pretty sad when you have to caution your followers to be courteous.

Monday, December 06, 2010 8:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:19 I thought he was talking to you.

Monday, December 06, 2010 9:59:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

To 8:19 my words of caution were directed at you as most everyone else knows how to address issues.

Monday, December 06, 2010 10:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
Perhaps you should try to learn from those who know how then.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:09:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:09
I suggest you get away from the chili pot and start paying attention yourself ole gal!

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 7:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Barrett can be the nicest guy you know are he can be your worse nighmare it all depends on how you treat him. Treat him with respect and you get respect treat him like a dog and you'll get barked at.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Courteous, he is not. And I consider myself one who is friendly with him.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You friendly with him, what a laugh.
Saw your post on other threads.

Hardy's gravy and biscuit is good, but fating.

Back to Barrett being courteous, I wouldn't know, because never meet him.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:23
Translation. Barrett can be nice as long as you agree with or go along with him. But Heaven forbid should you not see things exactly as he does.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What ever you say Janet.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The gender confusion goes on and on. What difference does it make who I am?

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 7:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the reason so many refer to you as the enabler of evil, you make everything about Barrett and take the focus off the real problems. I'm sure you see no problem with the guy making over 3.5 million a year from my over priced electric bill bu it's really hurting me a lot of others.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:50
So many? I would guess three to five cheerleaders at best.

I don't recall anyone saying he or she was in favor of the 3.5 million per year salary. That's an outrage.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If that's a outrage then why don't you stick to the subject and help organize some resistance 10:17

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Because 10:17 is obsessed with Allen. He's the first one on her mind in the morning, and the last thing when she goes to bed at night.
Jerry Springer did an entire show on Women like her. Strange stuff.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has the mayor picked a new PES member yet or is it the same old person?

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:43:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If it works why change it?

Do you really think Vic would of changed it or should I have said would Mother have changed it?

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12:55
You really are making yourself look stupid by continuing to call me a female when you've been told over and over that I'm not. What is it that you can't seem to understand about that?
Oh, and my "obsession" with allen barrett is purely and simply with his misbehavior. Believe me when I tell you have no desire whatsoever to be anything like him. It is my rightful opinion that he alone has caused more trouble than anyone else ever in the history of Giles County. My plea is that he would stop it, but I don't think he will.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 6:20:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not the poster of 12:55 but agree with him. You are obsessed with WAB. that don't mean you are in love with him. I think you despise him, he is still on your mind all time.

Has he said something about your wife, sister, Mother, or you beside what you post, if not cool it. You just make matters worse.

I think you posting against him keeps you from being as religious as you claim. God don't want me to post. We are just stirring the pot.

Tell why what Barrett said is wrong. Have you ever done that.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 9:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To 3:43 I think the mayor wants his campain treasurer on the PES board!

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh good. I was hoping it would be Scott Newton. I love Stanley. Good people.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:19
As I said, my problem with barrett is with his misbehavior and troublemaking. I don't know how to make that any plainer.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like I said tell why what Barret said or did was wrong. Not everything you have blamed on Barrett has been him a lot of people say things on this blog
why do you always blame Barrett?

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To say I always blame the pos is false.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MOst everything you say is false!

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:36
My, but you were busy spewing last evening.
Please allow me to translate your above post. Everything I say is distasteful to you guys because I challenge you and, more often than not, strongly disagree.

Thursday, December 09, 2010 6:21:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:11 wrote if it works why change it. These were the group who said yes to everything Ron Holcomb wanted and yet Speer kept them all on! we need to move away from these yes men!

Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd say appointing the son of the last man to run against Speer would be a step in that direction.

Thursday, December 09, 2010 5:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wake up people. do you think a county with so little population and hasn't grown in the last 100 years will have any impact on anything.

Saturday, December 11, 2010 2:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It sure has an impact on my pocketbook.

Monday, December 13, 2010 5:30:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Still making childishly false claims of misbehaving and trouble-making without any examples or supportive evidence.

The sad thing is that while the county continues to shrink it continues to spend as if there is a boom in population. People are hurting financially yet many seem content to just sit back and allow the abuse to continue.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
Actually, the county has gained a bit in population. Once again, you need to get your facts straight.
Consider this. Why would people want to move here when they find out about all the attacks, smears, and troublemaking? I think the county is holding its own in spite of all the negative publicity the hate and strife has brought on Giles County.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How do you know the county has gained in population or lost in population?
What do you go by?

I would like for WAB and Rabid both to answer.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:29:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Sorry 10:40 but because you wish a thing does not make such true.
The 2000 census numbered 29,447 individuals in Giles County. The 2009 estimate has dropped that number to 29,082. A reduction of 365 or -1.2% this is while the state grew at a 10.7 rate.

To answer your question why would anyone want to move here after finding out that nepotism controls the county, corruption is prevalent in local politics, those not born here are unwelcome unless they bring a truck load of money with them, jobs are in short supply, wages are held artificially low, to do business you have to co-operate with the Pulaski Mafia, and a large segment of the population is willing to tolerate such wrongdoing.
The problem isn't the "hate and strife" you claim but the fact that little to nothing is done to solve the problems, and so you can save your time, covering up and denying the existence of a problem is never a way of solving the problem.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:33:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wab
Look, nepotism exists to some degree everywhere. So if you want that utopian society, why don't YOU pack up and move to a town where your knowledge and expertise would be better appreciated? Why would you want to live in this corrupted place anyhow?
The fact the nepotism exists everywhere prompts me to once again disagree with you. As mentioned previously, I believe people would be reluctant to come here because of all the strife and turmoil that exists. I'm certain that you are not so naive as to think people from outside Giles County don't know about it. It's quite embarrassing. I've had people ask me about it who live as far away as Rutherford County! And guess what? They never mention nepotism.
By the way, would you care to name some of those you think are in the Pulaski Mafia?

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:42 There you go spewing and not answering the question 2:29 asked.
Do you know the answer to anything?

You said the population had grown, what do you base that on?

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Surely you didn't expect her to answer a question.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 9:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mayor Pat Fraud put his buddy on the PES board even when going against what Wes Kelly asked for!
Thats 2 more yes men to the board.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Poor Vicky.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:56
Since you are making such an issue of it, can you prove otherwise?

Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:23 You said the population of Giles county had grown and I asked what you based it on? I don't know if it grew or decreased. WAB answered what he based his idea on but you ignore it like you do every thing else.

Still waiting.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:20:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

you gonna be waitin a long time 8:20 the enabler don't answer no questions with anything but his feeling cause what he feels are hears at hardee's is all the reality he needs.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 9:10:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Still waiting.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:23
You started it but can't tell where you get your info, so sad.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1:57 (am???!). The radio said the two appointments were made with unanimous support of the Board. Was Vicky absent?

Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:23
Can you prove otherwise, or are you just trying to be contentious?

Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:27:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:27 What a nut you are. You said "Anonymous said...

wab
Actually, the county has gained a bit in population. Once again, you need to get your facts straight.
Consider this. Why would people want to move here when they find out about all the attacks, smears, and troublemaking? I think the county is holding its own in spite of all the negative publicity the hate and strife has brought on Giles County.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:40:00 AM

All I did is ask where got your info. Mr. Barrett gave the census as where he got his. You just want to be cute and not answer. You need to see a doctor badly.

I don't know who is correct or how to find out if it gained or loss.

I'm just trying to get a sensible answer out of you.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:
01
As I said, can you prove otherwise, or are you just wanting an argument? Why are you splitting hair over this anyhow?

Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Splitting hairs. No I can't prove the population has increased or decreased. I just asked a simple question why you think it has increased. You want say why you think it has increased. That is ridiculous.

I'm beginning to believe all I've read on this blog about you.

I would like to know if the county has increased or decreased. What is wrong with that?

Do you think using big words makes you smart when you say something but can give a reason why it's right or wrong?

Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:14 You didn't really think the enabler would give a reason for what she/he believes did you?

Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's so hard about telling why you think the county has gained or lost in population?

Mr. Barrett said in 2000 the population was 29,447.
In 2009 it was 29,082.
That's not much of a lost but still a lost.

I google Giles Co., TN population and found this, will it help you?

The county was named for William B. Giles, Virginia congressman, senator and governor
Sponsored Ads
TN
Demographics Map
TN Log Homes
Map Population
Obituaries Records
Historic Map
Giles County is one of 95 counties in Tennessee. The estimated population in 2004 was 29,255. This was a decrease of -.65% from the 2000 census.

That was 6 years ago, sorry I can't help anymore than that, I suggest you go with what Allen Barrett said.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 9:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr Barrett said "The 2000 census numbered 29,447 individuals in Giles County. The 2009 estimate has dropped that number to 29,082. A reduction of 365 or -1.2% this is while the state grew at a 10.7 rate."

These are numbers from the US Census Office and can be checked by typing in US Census into any search engine then go to Tennessee and then to Giles County. There is a lot of important information there
about the people in the county.

Thursday, December 16, 2010 10:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:45
Look, I honestly thought our population had grown a little (not much). If barrett is right about that, then so be it, and I accept it as gospel.
I realize that kids go off to college, people die, some families are transient, and etc. Wouldn't such things as those affect population at any given time? Even so, a loss of some 350 people does not mean our county is dying. Ok? I still say there are businesses as well as families who would move here were it not for all the embarrassing fussing and fighting that prevails.
Whenever I'm wrong, I'm man enough to admit it. Perhaps we all could do that instead of calling names and trying to stir up trouble.

Friday, December 17, 2010 6:31:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:31 I'm the one wanting how you knew the county had increased or from Barrett how he knew the county has decreased.

Barrett answered but you just popped off. Now you thought it had increased, at least that is an answer.
Was it so hard to answer?
Thanks.

Friday, December 17, 2010 8:26:00 AM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

Getting back on topic this information was just released on Monday. Still it's doubtful many have read about it anywhere else.

"Tennessee Valley Authority residential customers will pay up to $1.50 more a month in January to cover an increase in the utility's fuel costs. The utility said in a statement that demand is expected to increase, primarily because of colder weather.
The monthly increase is the ninth since March and represents an 18.3 percent climb in fuel costs since January.
((c) 2010 News Sentinel. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All rights Reserved.)"
Perhaps it's not just the weather but the huge salaries that have caused yet another increase.

With the president closing oil wells and banning all drilling in the gulf by Americans, only foreign countries can now drill and pump oil in the gulf, gas has taken yet another huge increase at the pumps.
Since this president has taken office gas has increased $1.30 per gallon. When the Democrats took control of Congress in January 2007 the economy was doing pretty well. One of the first things that the Democratic Congress did was to “punish” big oil. The result has been oil and gasoline prices at all-time highs. Regular gas went from less than $2.50 per gallon to nearly $4 per gallon on a national average.

Friday, December 17, 2010 10:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice story Barrett, but not true. Under bush and the republican led energy bill, gas went to $4.40/gallon. After the democratic energy bill, gas prices dropped by their largest decline in history to $1.60/gallon.

I'm not sure the democratic congress ever "declared war" on big oil, thy it sure beat the crap out of them....thankfully for all of us.

Friday, December 17, 2010 4:28:00 PM  
Blogger Allen Barrett said...

To 17 Dec. 4:28PM
Anyone can be mistaken but not in this case. Let me start with your less than insightful comment, "I'm not sure the democratic congress ever "declared war" on big oil, thy it sure beat the crap out of them....thankfully for all of us."

Are you aware of how many retirement plans are funded by investments in oil companies? Most mutual funds have investments in oil companies. When the government, under the democrat congress, attacked the oil companies it was those investors that suffered most as they watched their IRA's drop like a bowling ball going over the edge of a table.

This is a chart of gas prices since Obama took office and very easy to check as they are the government’s own numbers.

January 09 – 1.79; April 09 – 2.05; May 09 – 2.27; June 09 – 2.63;
Prices averaged between 2.50 and 2.75 thru March 2010; April 10–2.85
Sept 10- 2.71; October 10 – 2.80; November 2010 - 2.86.

This is part of an editorial from the Washington Times written almost a year ago.
“Get ready to pay a lot more than $3 a gallon to fill up your car during peak driving periods this spring and summer. More pain at the pump is the inevitable result of the Obama administration's carrot-and-stick approach to dealing with America's energy woes.
Within a month of taking office in 2009, drilling leases already approved by the outgoing George W. Bush administration were suspended. Then a six-month public comment period to proceed on whether to allow new drilling. When the comment period ended in September, the results were and continue to be suppressed.”
American Solutions, a grass-roots organization founded to pressure Washington to break policy gridlock, filed a Freedom of Information request to obtain the public comment tally. The comments, totaling 530,000, favored drilling by a margin of 2 to 1.”
Even now six months after the close of the public comment period because they didn’t get the results they wanted, the administration still has not published the public reaction.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration is predicting gas prices will soon reach more than $3 a gallon, and some areas have already exceeded that price. With the Obama administration actually imposing a two-year delay on new drilling - from 2010 until 2012. The clear message to Americans looking for relief is, “We'll get back to you - in two years.”
Of course when you’re eating $90.00 a pound steak with your buddies, walking around in shirt sleeves with your cigarette dangling it’s hard to consider the cost of gasoline or that heating oil has doubled since last year. The king is warm and full what does it matter if the Serfs suffer. One thing to consider is that even $90.00 a pound steak is turned into the same thing as $.20 worth of beans and a president or an enabler is full of the same thing.

Monday, December 20, 2010 11:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You claim to be a minister and talk like that? For Heaven's sakes!

Monday, December 20, 2010 12:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You always make something out of nothing.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Something out of nothing? Take a look at his last paragraph.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The vulgar thing is paying 90 dollrars for steak with taxpayer money.
What's so wrong about what he said the enabler is full of it, whatever it maybe.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If my preacher said I or anyone else was full of it (the implication being excrement), I would be attending elsewhere. That doesn't trouble you?

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you are in the congregation I doubt your preacher is saying anything but Oh me, oh my.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:15:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:15
You need another glass of kool-aid.
How childish. How can you defend such behavior???

Wednesday, December 22, 2010 1:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not defending anything just disgusted with your put on piety and shameful behavior.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:13
Does your preacher go around talking about people being full of...let's say excrement? Just wondering. If so, can you see any hypoocrisy in that?
Please tell me how my behavior is shameful in asking that question and how I am pretending piousness for doing so?

Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wish my preacher would do some plain talking sometimes instead of beating around the bush trying to be nice. Being politically correct has become so important to some they no longer can preach the gospel.

Thursday, December 23, 2010 1:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1:15
So are you saying that it's ok for your preacher to go around talking about others who are full of excrement? Surely, you jest!

Thursday, December 23, 2010 4:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You the only one who mentioned excrement, must make you feel good saying it you repeat it so much

Thursday, December 23, 2010 6:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've heard some say another person is full of himself or herself. Does that mean they are full of excrement?

Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:15 The reference was to a ninety dollar per pound steak and twenty cents worth of beans both turning into the same thing...namely excrement. How did you miss that?

Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cause my mind wasn't in the gutter 8:57

Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:57 Ok everything you eat turns into that, but did Barrett said that about you?

Thursday, December 23, 2010 10:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:21
His was.

Friday, December 24, 2010 7:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok. Let's try to ignore the gutter talk and thinking. Nothing good has ever come out of such divisiveness. May God bless us all this new year.

Monday, January 10, 2011 11:28:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The truest characters of ignorance are vanity, and pride and arrogance.
________Samuel Butler

Saturday, February 05, 2011 5:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Samuel Bulter must of known the one called enabler. Fits him to a T.

Sunday, February 20, 2011 4:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is no enabler unless you are talking about the one who started that lie in the first place.

Monday, February 21, 2011 5:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He's not an enabler he's Big Bad John or is it Big Bad wolf. You better watch out or he will get you.

Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:14:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think big bad wolf because he sure has a big blow.

Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:47:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home