Interesting Information From The E-911 Board Meeting ON Tuesday 15 July
Some questions and comments about that meeting.
How does a person over look $33,000.00 and just accidentally leave it out of the budget as income and then after approval just happen to find it and low and behold it's equal to an expediture the director sans to make.
If the E-911 office has approximately a thousand square feet now do they really need a new building that is 4300 square feet and cost $850,000 to $900,000 dollars to build? I agree they need more space but a million dollar facility that is almost trip in size? This is an example of how priorities need to be established.
Much thanks and appreciation go out to Chiefs Dickey and Collins who challenged the need for such a large and extravagant new building and offered an option in the possibility of simply adding on to the existing building at a far less expense.
Chief Dickey asked, if the new building was built would there be enough money in their income to maintain such a building? The director after much effort to redirect the question and it being asked several more times finally stated, "no".
Finally a motion was made by Chief Collins and approved by the board to study the cost of an addition at the existing building and to study the cost of a downsized new building.
The last issue raised was the matter of an investigation into the possible inappropriate behavior of the Director and inappropriate relationships at the 911 workplace.
How does a person over look $33,000.00 and just accidentally leave it out of the budget as income and then after approval just happen to find it and low and behold it's equal to an expediture the director sans to make.
If the E-911 office has approximately a thousand square feet now do they really need a new building that is 4300 square feet and cost $850,000 to $900,000 dollars to build? I agree they need more space but a million dollar facility that is almost trip in size? This is an example of how priorities need to be established.
Much thanks and appreciation go out to Chiefs Dickey and Collins who challenged the need for such a large and extravagant new building and offered an option in the possibility of simply adding on to the existing building at a far less expense.
Chief Dickey asked, if the new building was built would there be enough money in their income to maintain such a building? The director after much effort to redirect the question and it being asked several more times finally stated, "no".
Finally a motion was made by Chief Collins and approved by the board to study the cost of an addition at the existing building and to study the cost of a downsized new building.
The last issue raised was the matter of an investigation into the possible inappropriate behavior of the Director and inappropriate relationships at the 911 workplace.
posted by Allen Barrett | 10:02 AM
162 Comments:
Barrett......define inappropriate behaviors by the director and in the workplace. Give the names ands the offenses. Otherwise, you are, as someone said, like a little girl who claims to know something but will not tell. More troublemaking and more enemies made. What a guy!
Well you can check with Tim Underwood the attorney in charge of the investigation. I did not make a judgement on the investigation only reported it in order for the people of the county to know what you obviously don't want them to know.
10:31
That's a lie. I thought you were against judging the thoughts and intents of another's heart?
You really need a job...but not as a commissioner.
10:26,
Can you help us get the names of those who accused Webb?
What's a lie 11:08?
That there's no investigation; that he didn't make a judgement; that he reported the facts; that you don't want people to know the facts? Which is it?
How did anything in that statement lead you to believe that the "intent" of any one's heart had been judged.
This is another example of why Barrett should be elected as commissioner if for no other reason than to piss off the enabler.
10:26 Was you the one acted like a little girl who claims to know something but will not tell on Barrett several days ago?
What's fair for the goose is fair for the gander.
The lie Allen Barrett told is that I "obviously" do not want anything investigated. The troublemaking just never ends, does it?
12:23 you sure got a strange way of showing you want things changed or even looked into. You want things your way with all your buddies and pals doing whatever they want too
Oh hell cg, you don't want anything investigated if it leads to truths being told about your buddies in office. You are certainly a different sort of Christian than the one's I've read of in the Bible. Once again, you are supporting lying by omission; a willful enabling of wrongdoing. Go right ahead with your little lies that you don't consider to be lies. I'm sure Hell ain't half full yet.
Way to go! LOL
1:57
And you and that other one continue to enable and promote the lie Allen Barrett told. Now he's told another one. And you continue to defend him.
You want to play this game? How dreary your life must be to support and defend a troublemaker. You would have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see it.
Hello there WHINEY BABY (aka the CG)
2:46,
I don't see any one supporting or defending you.
You won't either unless he abuses his family into coming to his aid. Come to think of it, living with the enabler would be abuse enough.
If a person in office does something wrong would they not be considered a toublemaker?
If you defend them of doing something wrong would you not be enabling them?
Come to think of it CG don't defend anyone he just finds things to say against WAB. He never tells us what WAB said was wrong. One time he posted "Who said WAB was wrong?" Does that sound a little like deaf, dumb and blind?
4:57 Here's what Barrett said wrong. He LIED when he falsely accused me of willfully going along with wrongdoings. It was a lie when he told it and it still is. Is that FINALLY clear enough for you to understand?
You are right that there's not much support for those who oppose the meanness that goes on with this blog...but it's still there regardless of what you say. And as for support, I would support almost anyone who opposed troublemakers. Ok?
4:57 I just had a quick question. Is it true that the war in 7th District and against Mrs. Vanzant is going to really heat up in the next few day? I have heard that an all-out attack is in the making. Would you happen to know anything about that? Just wondering. I suppose we shall see.
But cg you are the chief trouble enabler. and if WAB told a lie "on" you then just show proof that it is a lie. So far my friend you have proven his point time and time again by what you continue to support.
5:52
Allen Barrett lied when he accused me of willfully going along with wrongdoings. As for proof, I have given him as well as you all you are going to get. And that should have been enough, but it was unacceptable. Do you always just blindly defend someone who tells a lie and is too proud to admit it?
But CG, you are the only one who says WAB was wrong about you and from your past record why should we take your word for anything? I would believe WAB over you any day. Get used to it.
Allen most certainly did not lie "on" cg. He thinks it's alright for candidates to conveniently leave out important details about their ethics. Every time he accuses Barrett of attacking one of them, he enables the lie of omission. Lies are lies, and sins are sins. By supporting the candidates he knows to be less than honest, he is willfully enabling their behavior. He refuses to answer to that. He won't say that is what he's doing, but it's as plain as the yellow streak on his back.
Folks, can I ask a favor of you? If it is alright, I would like for everyone to quit enabling the enabler on here. This person is one sick person. Do you realize how long he has kept repeating that Allen Barret was wrong about him or her and I think it is a him and first name is Chris. Folks it has been FOUR years. This started with the last election 4 years ago. Please ignore his posts because I am afraid he or she is going to flip out and then we will have another law suit on our hands. Some people get obsessed with things and this is one of those cases. Please try to avoid as much as possible.
Yes, Barrett did lie, and the only responses I have made in a long long time have been in defense of myself from the couple who insist on enabling and promoting a lie he told in the first place.
If you want everyone to stop enabling your promotion of that lie, why don't you stop promoting it and the problem will go away? But you love this drama, don't you?
The first board of directors that built E911 did a lot of research and spend a lot of time in the development of 911 in this county.It was one of the first 911's to go into operation in a rural county.It was used as a model by many other counties to start their 911.There was a lot of though went into the present building,future expansion was well thought out and planned for.Most people of the city or county don't know where 911 is located or have ever seen the building.If you look at the building you will see that it was designed for future addition.Three sides were covered by brick, the fourth was covered with vinyl so it could be easily removed and addition built on. Same idea with the roof line.The land was cleared at grade with room for addition.Even though went into underground utilities and phone lines to place them far enough from the present building for an addition.Even the underground grounding for antennas and equipment were well placed out of the way.All this was done to reduce cost down the road when expanson was needed.There is no doubt that the time has come,why not take advantage of the planning of past board instead of spending all this money for a fancy new building that want work any better than the present.That money needs to be better spent for the operation of 911 so if you call for help you will get it.Look up some of the old board members ask their thoughts on this building.911 is a very important piece of the puzzle in an emergency.If there is possible inappropiate behavior it should be dealt with at once by the board.
Thank you for that insightful post. Improve at least cost to the taxpayer and achieve the same goal.
8:14. You seem quite obsessed. May want to see somebody about that.
Don't you just love it when Barrett starts feeling the heat from his total ignorance of a subject he creates a diversion by attacking someone else ! I love his post tell the voters to only vote once and only vote for him! The man is an island and will set this county back 20 years if elected because he has pissed off every single person he encounters and none if them will give him the time of day ! It takes people working together to accomplish things! It won't happen when he attacks his fellow commissioners ! I wonder how a district meeting would go! Probably would be a brawl ! Do we need him?
Maybe the County would buy the 911 folks the Hunter Smith building again ? That's be a great way to dump $$ into a rat hole.
Bet CG'd love that
10:17
I b1elieve you are absolutely correct about Allen Barrett. And we don't need him. Those who know him know that he is trouble. I'm just thankful the voters in District 7 know how he is.
Well, you are right in one aspect 5:41 I am trouble to those who are willing to lie and cheat and steal and treat the taxpayer like an ATM machine. You are wrong about being able to work with other commissioners as I have a long record of getting along with the vast majority, the ones not engaged in abusive behaviors.
10:17 I'd be interested in knowing what heat I may have been feeling? I never changed the subject but I did post a different topic just as I have done over the past number of years. I did not take down a topic so you can continue to post an topics all the way back to the very first one.
As for asking people to vote for only one person instead of three is simply a means of not canceling out your votes.
Unlike you I give the community credit for being intelligent enough to have a discussion without breaking out into a "brawl". Presently citizens in the 7th District especially have absolutely no representation of their ideas and thoughts because they are not allowed to give input. Phone call are not returned and questions are met with blank stares.
When the matter was presented to the Legislative Committee about increasing the city's number of board members on the IDB the question was raised by Commissioner Adams that he did not want to vote on the matter until he had talked with his constituents this was met with this comment from Commissioner Harwell, "I don't see why they wouldn't understand what you were talking about".
If you don't believe that is an accurate quote then go check the video of the minutes. Several commissioners chastised him over that remark but the attitude was already expressed loud and clear.
As for your question, "Do we need him". I will answer yes, now more than ever. When there is a matter that's important to the people either as a whole or individual I am the one many call and asked what to do and how. As a commissioner I will push to not only keep the people informed and involved but provide the leadership needed for the 7th District to actually be represented. Here is an example of the district not being informed by our elected commissioners. Why are the people in the 7th district paying for dead animals to be picked up and disposed of from farms that are already highly subsidized and the price of beef is at record levels? Was the people of the 7th district asked how they felt about this, no but all three commissioners from the 7th district voted to spend over $70,000.00 this year to dispose of a totally unknown number of animals. Is the rest of the county helping to pay for our trash to be removed? are other businesses using taxpayer funds to have their trash removed? The answer is NO, it's the cost of doing business.
(5:18,5:51,6:08,8:21,10:17,5:41)aka the enabler,
Can't you get all your whining and lying done in one post?
Seems like you would want Barrett elected if can he set Giles County back ten years when you and our elected want everything to stay and operate as it did 200 years ago?
Wednesday, July 16, 2014 5:51:00 PM
You've heated up on Barrett. Did you get it wrong on who the heat would get heated up on?
When you can vote for three , I always vote for one, the one I want to win more than the others. So do most family members. If I vote for one or two more that is a vote against the one I want.
E-911 has a history of operating above their income. Expanding the existing building seems a way to contain costs. Another possibility would be to use one of the existing buildings available, such as the
BI-LO building or the Heilig-Meyers building.
8:14, that is an excellent idea. While I'm sure the enabler won't go away, at least by ignoring him relevant discussions won't be derailed by his childish whiny-ass rhetoric. He never has anything to add to the conversation except how Allen "lied on him." That and his other outright lies only distract everyone from their comments.
WAB! I saw someone pissing on one of your signs. You gonna have them arrested?
Must of been you 6:02..
Calm down before you mhave a heart attack.
And you watched until he was done, didn't you 6:02? You do know that society is a lot more tolerant towards homosexuals than it used to be. Don't be afraid to just come on out of that closet sweetie. You no longer have to sneak peeks.
Guess that wasn't you 6:02 since you havenothing to reach the bottom of the sign that stands taller than you.
Barrett...
Why don't you stop lying about all this and begin running a clean campaign? I know you won't do that at this point, so I will do what I can to help you on the way to your third and well-deserved defeat.
Exactly which commissioners are engaged in abusive behaviors? Why don't you man up and name them? Oh, and I've heard all about how well you "get along" with the commissioners.
No, you and I would strongly disagree about "do we need him". I think you are a cold and calculating individual that we do NOT need representing us. That's my opinion.
And I'm sure a LOT of people call on you for advice. Who? Are you talking about those in your neighborhood, none of whom have your sign in their yard? Right.
It is not my intention to hurt your feelings, but you set yourself up for these criticisms because of your misbehavior. And I know that you want to be a commissioner about as bad as you ever wanted anything else in life, but...it's not going to happen. It could have had you showed the right spirit and attitude toward those who don't see things as you do. And that alone is reason not to vote for you. You can't go through life (perhaps you can) throwing tantrums when someone disagrees with you.
The man gave names and proof of the abuse and wrongdoing can't you read? While you ignore the facts how can anyone ever show you anything real? I don't know how bad Barrett wants to be a commissioner but he said that being a commissioner wasn't worth doing the wrong things for,
You are probably right as smart as he is he would have been a commissioner long ago if he would only have been willing to lie and cheat and suck up to the big wheels. I admire him for what he's done, not once have I seen where he was proven wrong or any evidence of his doing wrong. He sure as hell has upset your apple cart and those like you and that by itself is a great benefit to the county.
5:40 What has Barrett lied about? How about some proof?
6:42/7:16
Again, why don't you let Barrett speak for himself?
Don't you remember? We're all Barrett. You make that accusation often enough. The only information Barrett left out was the corrupt ones addresses. You want them too?
You think Cg don't hate Allen Barrett? Just read his post.
my my my.....you all are certainly all-consumed with the person you call CG. It has now become predictable and laughable how you will respond...and respond....and respond.
I now watch to just see him push your buttons.
It's so funny to push his buttons.
Way to go people.
Seeing his reply is so funny.
There's 1. wait for it...there will be 2 more (just from the same person)
6:04 Do you know what you are talking about?
Maybe I should say speak English.
At the meeting Barrett asked about a investigation and Roy said that there was one. What or who is being investigated and why. I was talking with a friend and he said that what's happened at the 911 will make the school situation look like petty stuff.
tell us more 6:11
Yes, tell us more, tell us more, like does he have a car?
No he drives a truck or maybe she's ridding a bike..
I thought you guys were against the "little school girl syndrome" wherein one knows a secret he or she will not tell? Right?
I thought the litte girl syndrome belolng to CG the enabler.
Now you have something to cry aboutsince that seems to be what you do best.
8:36 Enabler is a term Allen Barrett pinned on me simply because I did not see things the way he thought I should. It was a lie when he told it and it still is. You are the true enabler for enabling the lie he told. I thought you guys were all against supporting lies and deception?
8:36 You sure gave CG something to piss and moan about.
I believe that was what you meant to do becuase like everyone else you know he just has to post.
That is why I encourage all of you to stop calling "CG" .. the "CG". I believe that the name ... "WHINEY BABY" suits his demeanor and attitude better.
He/she sounds more like a whinney than a Christian. He must be a pew warmer. A lot of his post don't seem like something a true Christian would do.
8:55
I thought you guys were all against those who would judge the thoughts and intents of another's heart? Has that changed, or does it only apply to those who would disagree with you?
10:10 The pot just called the kettle black.
2:56
I would rather define it as hypocrisy...the kettle calling the pot black.
5:11 It don't matter if it's the kettle calling the pot black or the pot calling th kettle black. They are still the same thing.
The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner
Too bad they can't be discussed that way. Someone likes to get the attention off on them.
7:32
Not so. You guys can't seem to discuss things without calling others names and making all sorts of accusations. I try to get the focus off the meanness and troublemaking.
6:43 you have tried to get the focus off the crookedness and misconduct of your buddies.
It is not meanness or troublemaking when a politician's record is discussed or their illegal and unethical behavior is exposed.
I suppose that when police offices arrest someone for violating the law it's because they are just being mean and making trouble in your view.
By your words the newspaper is just being mean and making trouble each time they publish a list of names of people that are to appear in court; have been arrested; have a foreclosure; or anything other than to tell what their batting average is but then if their batting average is rather low wouldn't that also be mean to reveal.
You need to get out of your liberal induced coma of Utopian dreams and come into the real world.
Allen please, don't lump that nutcase in with well-intentioned liberals. All of us certainly don't believe in the things he does.
Barrett
Once again YOU ARE LYING. Why would anybody vote for you?
I have never said one word about foreclosures, arrest records, and the like. That's another of your lies.
3:14 What the hell are yoi talking about?
If Barrett hadn't been to meetings and found out what was going on then telling people they never would of know what was going on. So sad one little individual don't want it told. We would still have the man that was breaking the Light Department really breaking it. I heard he is no longer in the job he left here for.
Your arguments make no sense enabler. Barrett was making an analogy. He never said you made any comments about foreclosures, arrest records and the like. You really need to stop trying to flame every topic and slow down and read. Dumbass.
5:06 He just can't understand. Needs to go back to school.
5:06 enabler
Well I didn't like Barrett's insinuation, so I responded to it. He shouldn't be allowed to get away with the things he does. He hurts and defames people, you two are all too happy to defend him.
What insinuation, 6:54? You do not know what it means to defame someone. It has to be a lie to be defamation. The things Mr. Barrett reported on the candidates are public record, so the only one guilty of defaming someone on this blog is you. But you knew that didn't you?
I don't know about them two enabler, but I am damn happy to defend him. You make my defense very easy. All I have to do is read the posts, follow the ones based on truth, and disregard the ones that are not. Guess your go in the waste receptacle.
's
Guess I'm number three, but I know four more that have been posting.
The one I dislike is the enabler that tries to stir up trouble and blame it on Barrett. If he would just go away there wouldn't of been half as much on this blog as has been. He has hurt the 7th District canidates and vanzant more than anyone is what I hear around the county. I've been surprise at some of the people that don't want Vanzant.
9:10
enabler
So do the "five" of you meet secretly from time to time to plan out your next method of attack? It brings to mind the secretive meetings that others have held to push their agenda through, all the while claiming to be speaking for the people. Garbage!
You are one of the enablers who is causing so much trouble in our county. If you don't like it here, why don't you and the other one move to Murfreesboro and take Mr. Barrett with you? I am CERTAIN that you would all be missed.
As for my supposedly stirring up trouble and blaming it on Barrett, you have got to be either delusional or not playing with a full deck. It is Barrett who started this war in 7th District and against Mrs. Vanzant. That is not even arguable. Everybody knows it. I just continue to ask that he run a clean campaign and stop trying to hurt those who are running against him. I think it's pure evil.
Mr. Barrett did tell on this blog what tose people did he thought was wrong.
I saw Terry Harwell have a hissy fit on the square. He didn't have enough sense to remember he should try to control his anger out like that instead of cry I'm a county commissione.
Is it true Terry offered to resign as commissione when he got the job in the FD and you, Vanzant and a few others didn't want him to?
I don't think Barrett will get elected because there are to many like you don't like people that wasn't born in Giles county to be elected to anything here. It don't bother me if he donm't get elected because I know he will still try to keep be doing what he has been doing.
Honey bunny I happen to like Giles county and don 't plan to go anywhere. Maybe some day Giles county will get to be a better place for everyone.
The enabler will never be lonely because he has his friend paranoia with him. Of course he stirred up trouble. He was on here well before the election stoking the fires of discontent. I feel sorry for those who must live around him. My condolences folks.
10:55 enabler of a lie
Enabler is the name Allen Barrett called me simply because I don't see things as he does. By the way, that was a lie, and I do hate to keep reminding you. But I promised to call it a lie anytime you bring it up. YOU are the true enabler....you and the other one who promites your buddy's lie.
The enabler's family are enabling Vanzant too.
Tee hee enabler, enabler, enabler.
Enabler is a name that you worked very hard to earn. I will not call you anything else while you willfully support wrongdoing and those who partake in it.
9:19/9:11/9:36
enabler
My family and I are not enabling ,Mrs. Vanzant. No, we are supporting her with out time and with out votes.
As for the term "enabler", I think you and the other one have earned that tittle. You are promoting a lie told out of spite by a known troublemaker. How can you do that? So stop being a partaker and enabler in his lie.
3:22 When you stop you arrogrant behaver, I will. Will try that?
You're really being a dumbass today enabler. I've told you time and time again why I refer to you as I do. It has nothing to do with anyone except you. Bitch and gripe, piss and moan, if you enable wrongdoing you are an enabler. Sorry.
7:52
enabler of a lie
There you go again promoting an Allen Barrett lie. Refer to me as you wish, but I will remind you that Barrett is a liar anytime you enable his lie.
3:22 enabler, you are hypocrite. You want everyone else to vote for her but you just stated that you and your family are not going to vote for her.
7:39 Sorry that you misunderstood. Most of my family and I have already voted for Mrs. Vanzant. We are encouraging others relatives and friends to do the same. That's our right.
I would direct you to Matthew 7:1.
You want Bible verses how about these commandments,
"Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,"
Now just for your benefit since you may have missed this one or possibly just decided to exclude it from your verse salad:
"Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;"
Eph. 5:11 New American Standard Version
You want Bible verses how about these commandments,
"Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,"
Now just for your benefit since you may have missed this one or possibly just decided to exclude it from your verse salad:
"Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;"
Eph. 5:11 New American Standard Version
Sorry enabler, you said you and your family were going to support her with out votes. What part did I misunderstand?
I think the enabler was typing while in the midst of a hissy fit. For someone who doesn't care what people think, he sure does get tore up about it.
9:50 I noticed that "with OUT". He hit the wrong key in his hissy fit. But there is a big difference in OUT and OUR.
Guess that's what happens when you let Terry do your spell checking.
Barrett...
Again, that's exactly what I have been trying to do....to expose YOU. I sincerely believe that you are a very wicked man who will stop at nothing to get what he wants...even if it means destroying and hurting others, some of whom are totally innocent. That's what I believe.
I would now refer you to Philippians 2:3 and particularly to James 3: 14-16. These verses tend to nail you...my opinion.
For a person who whines like a baby about being judged I don't remember seeing anybody judge you as "a very wicked man". Guess that old double standard done showed up again. You such a hypocrite enabler.
Someone has Barrett on his brain.
At least the enabler is starting to come around. Now only "some" of his people are innocent. Kinda reminds you of how he acted about jackson and them, don't it? His family must have gotten around to reading some of his posts and agreed that he was indeed an enabler.
7:54 There's a vast difference between saying it is my opinion that Barrett is a very wicked man (I think he is) and passing judgment by saying he is in fact wicked. I gave my opinion.
You are right enabler. Your opinion is about as far from fact as one can get. It's great that you admitted that to everyone.
10:09
enabler of a lie
You know, I thought about what you said, and couldn't disagree with you more.
It would trouble me if I knew so many people hated me as they do Mr. Barrett. But I don't think it bothers him one bit. What seems to be more important to him is a seat on the commission. I don't think he will ever get it, and he has paid a terrible price for his attempts. That's pathetic.
I don't know what post you're responding to, but you are evidently confused again. My post addressed the statement that you made admitting that there was a "vast difference" between your opinion and what is actually true. You should be thinking about what YOU said.
I don't think it bothers cg that a lot of people hate him.
Has everyone listened to this video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxr0s3sstY
Notice how he brags about beinmg a commissionmer.
What was that word he called the man?
He called him an enabler. Er...I mean a faggot. You can how I got those two mixed up.
Some kinmd of Christian to approve of anyone being called that. Also some kind of commissioner would do something like that, He should of been put in jail.
Especially when after that he went on to file a false police report. I guess he was too stupid to realize everything had been caught on tape.
grammar people. grammar
8:20 Don't you know some children haven't learned grammar yet? They know how to use a computer by the time they can walk.
7:53
You simpleton (describing behavior). There's a vast difference between opinion and fact. For goodness sakes; do you miss the point on everything?
Oh, and if as many people hate me as do Allen Barrett, you had better believe I would be bothered by it. But you see; I know that isn't true. Will I need to explain that to you further?
Does it matter if it 50 or 100 that hate you? Some people do.
Why don't you talk about the lie you told about not posting Monday?
You haven't explained it to me the first time yet enabler. All you've done is agree with me. There is a vast difference between your opinion and fact. You said it, why are you trying to take it back. When will you realize that you are your worst enemy? Also moron, if you were describing behaviour, you would have said that "you act like a simpleton" instead of "you simpleton." You really are stupid, aren't you. BTW, I'm not just describing behaviour there.
7:54
You are absolutely ridiculous. (hook,. line and sinker) and totally in the tank for One Shot.
You want to split hair with me about the difference between two concepts when it appears you don't see the distinction.
Please give it a rest. You're starting to become really boring.
If not a dictionary, perhaps a free spell-check program?
Has anyone seen an apology?
Anonymous"Anonymous said...
9:59 As I said, cite the post. If I did make the post and forgot, I will admit it. It could be that I made a post before I left the house that day, but I honestly don't think so. While you are "citing", please allow me to refer you to Exodus 20:16 and I Peter 3:16.
Wednesday, July 30, 2014 7:00:00 AM
Anonymous said...
It just occurred to me that it's pointless to argue with the troublemakers, so may I suggest some Bible passages for us all to read and consider? How about Proverbs 6:16-19 and Matthew 7:12. More later.
Monday, July 28, 2014 6:35:00 AM
8:25 enabler
Cite the post. That's all you have to do since you want to argue over this.
8:28 you really are stupid aren't you.
8:28 Are you rreally that dumb or sick. It's been sited over and over. Here goes again.
Anonymous said...
It just occurred to me that it's pointless to argue with the troublemakers, so may I suggest some Bible passages for us all to read and consider? How about Proverbs 6:16-19 and Matthew 7:12. More later.
Monday, July 28, 2014 6:35:00 AM
11:41 Is he also the liar on the blog that claims he didn't post on Monday July 28?
Anonymous said...
It just occurred to me that it's pointless to argue with the troublemakers, so may I suggest some Bible passages for us all to read and consider? How about Proverbs 6:16-19 and Matthew 7:12. More later.
Monday, July 28, 2014 6:35:00 AM
Enabler at 6:28, if by "split hair" you mean correct your obvious mistakes, then absolutely. You have done this same thing since you've been posting on here. You make mistake, someone points it out to you, and then you accuse them of splitting hairs. No my stupid enabler, wrong is wrong and you are wrong. Live with it.
From the thread of
Monday, July 21, 2014
News From The County Legislative Body That Met This Morning
The enabler posted:
Anonymous said...
Barrett
Read Proverbs 6:16-19 and Matthew 7:12. Make the proper application and stop with the jealousy and resentment. It's YOUR fault that the voters don't want you. Think about that.
Calling me names only makes you look worse. And I have decided that it is a waste of time to argue back and forth with you and those other two, so I will leave you with some Bible verses from time to time in hopes that you will have that Eureka Moment wherein you will come to realize what you are doing.
Monday, July 28, 2014 6:52:00 AM
Then the enabler post on same thread:
Anonymous said...
Barrett
That's what I've been trying to do...expose YOU.
By the way, I wasn't on the blog at all yesterday. I needed your enabling duo to know that.
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 6:03:00 AM
Who made Monday's post then Enabler? You gave Bible verses after that. How can anyone believe you are a Christian when you lie?
"sited"? You're kidding me right? You do this on purpose don't you?
6:10 I would guess he/she does to make you wet your pants.
Strange you can't say anything about what the enabler posted
Could that be because you are him
Thought I would copy and paste so you can read it again. You know you posted this.
Anonymous said...
It just occurred to me that it's pointless to argue with the troublemakers, so may I suggest some Bible passages for us all to read and consider? How about Proverbs 6:16-19 and Matthew 7:12. More later.
Monday, July 28, 2014 6:35:00 AM
8:21 enabler of One Shot
Like I SAID, if I errantly stated that I didn't, then I forgot and am willing to say I'm sorry. That's more than I can say for One Shot who has never apologized for the lie he told that I willfully go along with wrongdoings. In fact, he never apologized for the lie he told that Mrs. Goolsby was asked to run by Mrs. Vanzant. I know Mrs. Goolsby, and trust me; she will make an excellent commissioner. She doesn't allow people to tell her what to think and what to do. I can't say that about you two enablers.
Speaking of One Shot, he's asking people to "one shot" him when they vote. I just thought of something. I would bet that those who voted for him during his last two DEFEATS did that very thing. Otherwise, the margin of his defeats would have been much more telling. Am I right about that?
Why should Barrett apologize when you prove him right post after post? If you don't want to be referred to as an enabler, stop enabling. Pretty simple solution, wouldn't you say?
8:53 pm. I take it you didn't read the post that cited you posted on Monday. I've read it over and over and over because your are to arrogrant to admit you posted it.
What would be wrong with Mrs. Vanzant asking anyone to run for Commissioner? hat would b wrong for anyone to ask someone to run for Commissioner. Don't we need good people to be elected? I don't understand how people could vote or someone that called a person a name and had a hissy fit on the square, but his loyal friends like the enabler will.
If you know goolsby so well, ask her who talked her into running. I think you will be surprised at the answer.
As for the whiz kid at 6:10; you left out a couple of commas genius. Brush up on your punctuation before you try to correct others.
Strange how people can see other people's mistakes but not their own.
Then don't wont to admitt they made a mistake. Get angery when it's pointed out to them. Does this make you think of someone? LOL
Sure it does, You just described the enabler right down to the last detail.
Once again the enabler proves to be a liar. He wrote at 6:46 Friday 1 Aug " I have no personal agenda against Allen Barrett"
But on 3 Aug. at 2:02 he wrote, "You are right. I do have something personal against One Shot. I believe he is a wicked man".
So not only does he lie about a personal feeling toward Barrett he judges his heart as being a wicked man. CG the enabler has a greater power than Jesus in determining who is wicked and who isn't well at least in his own perverted mind.
enabler of One Shot
Yep, seven in a row. You are totally insane. Do you realize that? Are you by any chance One Shot posting anonymously?
Do you not realize you are doing the same thing you are calling the other poster insane for? Your family definitely needs to hold an intervention.
12:50 You miss the simplest point. I am merely responding to a lunatic. And I think the lunatic is you.
I'm not the poster, but he is simply pointing out that you are a liar as well as being a hypocrite.
You miss the point you cowardly liar the point is in the question which part did you lie about the part about not having anything personal against Barrett or the part of having something personal against him.
Looks like you are having a crisis of truth telling inside your head but that shouldn't be any problem for you since there is so much space in that empty head.
Being a liar and a coward must be tiresome since you have so much trouble remembering what you write from one moment to the next.
10:04 Way to go Janet.
Is the heat getting to much for you?
Janet
God bless you for maintaining your composure when these three have done nothing but crucify you. And I hope the people of Giles County realize who is behind this and what party they represent when they go vote. Is it any wonder that people see the Republicans as mean-spirited and sneaky? They are!
Yeah, God bless her for keeping her composure in the face of unethical actions. You have to be pretty good at it to stay calm while you are screwing the citizens. I guess it's easier with you enabling her wrongdoings. Oh, you might want to use your fingers if you're having trouble counting past three.
As with all things people get better with practice. For twelve years the wrong things have been practiced that is why there is so much corruption coming out of the county executive 's office instead of productive advances that would better the living conditions of county citizens.
Everyone that don't like the president need to read the enable's post. 8:24
He just said you were mean-spirited.
"Is it any wonder that people see the Republicans as mean-spirited and sneaky? They are!"
One Shot
Stop lying. It's not going to get you elected. In fact, you are your own worst enemy.
Hot shot,
7:00 I think they just copied and pasted what you post? So it was a lie?
It amazes me that the enabler vilifies Barrett because he thinks he's lying yet he support those who he knows are lying and stealing. That's a unique code of ethics to live by.
It seems that for at least for a second time Mrs Vanzant has chosen to ignore the unsavory happenings at the E 911 office. While the EEOC and a local attorney continue to investigate. Mrs Vanzant ignores the reports of unacceptable behaviors, sexual harassment and a hostile work place created by the director.
If these charges are proven to be true will the whole matter be swept under the carpet as so much other dirt or will there actually be some penalties for the possible wrongdoing. The E-911 Board has refused to discuss the matter other than to say there is an investigation, but is the investigation timed simply to end after the elections then quietly be dismissed?
Well that would be business as usual for our officials, would it not?
Barrett
Why don't you just come on out and be specific about your charges of sexual harassment and a hostile work environment. And, as ususal, sign your name. Will you stop attacking Mrs. Vanzant after she wins tomorrow?
7:52
CG prove you are a Christian tomorrow.
Proverbs 24:17
English Standard Version
Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles,
New American Standard Bible
Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, And do not let your heart be glad when he stumbles;
King James Bible
Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth:
So we are to cut and paste on every thread? And that is persuasive how?
enabler please check above my comment and see if my name is there then help me understand how I could put my name on there more clearly?
Barrett
Please stop lying. Why can't you just be honest?
May I congratulate you now for a solid fifth place win in your district today. You deserve it because of the way you have tried to smear and hurt your opponents.
But I'm not going to gloat. I just want you to take your integrity and go home.
6:32 Sounds like gloating. Thought you was a Christian.
Watch the heat today.
My damn enabler, you are the king of cut and paste. How can you have the gall to put someone else down for doing the same thing. Oh wait, that's what you always do. My bad.
Of course the investigation will be swept under the rug!!!! I have been told by several that there are printed E Mails of inappropriate relations between Director and a married dispatcher Also that the person who reported it was terminated it isnt the first time director used his position to get favors I also heard that right in the middle of this investigation employees recieved a pay raise things that make you wonder?° I wonder if the public asked to see the Emails or complaints what would happen? Mrs.Vanzant has known for years about complaints against director if you dont believe it go ask her
11:09 Do you think she would tell the truth. People will still vote for her.
She has a lot of relatives then they have theiir relatives voting for her.
Did Giles County go for the governor? I just know he won the Republican party.
Bet that pissed cg off.
6:40
I was disappointed, but that's politics. I wouldn't say that I was angry though.
Does anyone know why the diector of 911 in Columbia was terminated? I cant believe it could be worse the what Giles 911 director has done thought to ponder the Attorney was our own locals hum? Please dont reply with ramblings about AB
He allegedly made unwanted sexual advances towards someone, I don't know if it was a man or woman. They supposedly have documents to back that up.
The board of directors took action in Maury County they didn't try to cover it up like in Giles County
According to some at the last meeting there is proven documentation in re if 911 director and dispatcher I know the person that reported it was terminated Ema director thinks conduct was ok humm so the board did not hide it they just approve of misconduct there are emails but Im assuming the public will never know when is the next 911 board meeting
they will have to advertise when they meet.Isn't EMA director Whitt wife a dispatcher at 911
He is the board member that said it was ok ..i guess if he thought it didnt matter the board thought it was ok as well it is his wife but it wouldnt be the first time he approved of such matters lts see 34 and 70 hum
Post a Comment
<< Home