Giles Free Speech Zone

The purpose of the "Giles Free Speech Zone" is to identify problems of concern to the people of Giles County, to discuss them in a gentlemanly and civil manner, while referring to the facts and giving evidence to back up whatever claims are made, making logical arguments that avoid any use of fallacy, and, hopefully, to come together in agreement, and find a positive solution to the problem at hand. Help make a difference! Email "mcpeters@usit.net" to suggest topics or make private comments.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

25 August Power Board Meeting

Why would anyone get up and go to town just to attend a Power Board Meeting at 7AM?
I was very encouraged when the meeting began with a statement that future purchases under $50,000.00 by the Power Company would come before the Power Board for approval instead of giving them an invoice to approve.

Next on the agenda was an announcement by Mr. Kelly that several policies were being reviewed and would be presented to the board for approval at a later date. Included in this review was the policy on vehicles and travel of employees.

It was announced that Tammy Bubb had resigned from the Electric System and they were looking for an accounting firm to handle their finances on a temporary basis.

Also announced there would be a number of public meetings held at various places in the county to better inform the public about the AMI meter systems.

A clip from UTUBE was shown describing the need for a new national electrical grid system and greater efforts toward energy use controls.

The possibility of providing cell phone service through Energize is being explored.

I asked permission to ask a question just prior to the Board adjourning and was reluctantly allowed to ask two questions and was sorely disappointed by the reaction of the Board Chair. I asked since the public meetings when it had been discussed to move the Board Meeting to a later time if and when that change might be expected. There was no response from the Chairman and when I asked again Mr. Kelly graciously stated it was being discussed but no decision had been made yet.
I referenced my second question as one of credibility. That when the power company or anyone else asked people to cut back on their energy usage yet they refused to cut back their own usage they tended to lose credibility, and I asked what was the thermostat in the conference room set at since it seemed very, very cold. This obviously did not set well with the Chairman and he immediately adjourned the meeting and refused to answer even when asked a second time.
After the meeting Mr. Kelly once again came to the rescue and stated there had been some problems getting the room temp. adjusted but they were working on it. A very reasonable and acceptable explanation.

While the meeting seemed to go well and offer some promising changes I was extremely disappointed in the attitude of the recently re-appointed chairman, Mr. Bryant. I still consider him a capable, honorable man but must now ask myself if the security of a new four year term to the Power Board might have created a renewed comfort in business as usual. I certainly hope not for I believe he is much better than that. Allen Barrett

Is Interest On County Money Now Unimportant?

WKSR accurately reported today that the School Board recently voted to allow $250,000.00 to be moved from the school general fund into the Federal programs because the federal government was slow paying their bills. As WKSR stated, "The board unanimously approved the transfer of $250,000. $175,000 of the money will be used to cover payroll and $75,000 for any additional expenditures that would need to be paid before the federal stimulus package money is received. After a brief discussion, the board members and Garner agreed the money should be transferred back into the general fund as soon as the federal money is received."

This all seemed simple enough until last night when the School Committee of The County Commission met. There the request was made by Mr. Jackson that the money be transferred into the federal funds "and kept there until June of 2010".

Why would this money be taken out of the general funds where it can earn interest until used and basically placed in a box where it just sits until possibly used? The state auditors have authorized this action but have not required it.
I asked the question, "even if it only makes 1% in interest would that not be worth keeping it in the general fund and moved only if needed as the School Board voted". The answer was "that's only a couple thousand dollars". It seems the committee felt if the money was needed later they would have to vote on the matter again and that wasn't acceptable.
No one was willing/able to explain why there is the necessity or what benefit there would be in putting this much money aside for ten months where it draws no interest for the county. Allen Barrett