Anonymous Letters Being Sent To Some Commissioners
Under new business an issue was voiced that a commissioner had been sent a letter that was very critical of the Commission and it's members. The commissioner that received the letter voiced no objection to the criticism only the fact it had been sent by someone "too big a coward to sign their name to it".
Another criticism voiced by a different commissioner was that some "very bad and wrong information was being put on the blog by people who were too cowardly to sign their names".
The commissioner expressed some concern that people might believe some of the stuff that wasn't true. I have re-read the post from the topic the commissioner spoke of and could not find the specifics of one matter which was an absolute untruth. I agree with this commissioner and have stated the criticism before, "Only a yellow back coward would post personal attacks or gossip as truth then sign their name as anonymous".
I believe there is a need for some to post anonymous and cowardice has little to do with it, but those folks would not make a personal attack against someone or post known lies as truth, these folks usually post something in support of their statements.
On the other hand a coward posts evil, provides no support for such accusations and then hides under the name anonymous. Those people have no credibility and should be labeled for the destructive cowards they reveal themselves to be.