State Audit Findings For Giles County Ending 30 June 2011
Audit ending 30
June 2011 for Giles County
with six findings and recommendations, which have been reviewed with
OFFICE OF FINANCE DIRECTOR
♦ A revenue anticipation note was not issued in compliance
with state statute.
OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS
♦ Expenditures exceeded appropriations.
♦ The School Department had deficiencies in the use of
federal Special Education Cluster funds.
OFFICE OF CIRCUIT,
GENERAL SESSIONS, AND JUVENILE COURTS CLERK
♦ The office did not deposit some funds within three days of
collection.
♦ The court software did not have adequate application
controls.
OFFICES OF CLERK AND
MASTER, REGISTER, AND SHERIFF
♦ Duties were not segregated adequately.
FINDING 11.01 A REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE WAS NOT ISSUED IN COMPLIANCE
WITH STATE STATUTE
(Material Noncompliance Under Government Auditing Standards)
During the year, the Highway/Public Works Fund borrowed $450,000 from the
General Fund to provide cash for operations in anticipation of revenue
collections. This loan was not approved
by the state Comptroller’s Office. Section 9-21-801, Tennessee Code Annotated, allows the County
Commission to issue revenue
anticipation notes with the approval of the state Comptroller’s Office. This deficiency resulted from a lack of
oversight by management.
RECOMMENDATION
Revenue anticipation notes should be approved by the state Comptroller’s
Office as required by state statute.
________________________
OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS FINDING 11.02 EXPENDITURES
EXCEEDED APPROPRIATIONS
(Noncompliance Under Government Auditing Standards)
Salaries exceeded appropriations in 32 payroll line-item
accounts in the General Purpose
School and School Federal Projects
funds by amounts ranging from $2 to $119,534.
Section 5-9-401, Tennessee Code Annotated, states that “All funds from
whatever source derived, including, but not limited to, taxes, county aid
funds, federal funds, and fines, that are to be used in the operation and
respective programs for the various departments, commissions,
institutions, boards, offices, and agencies of county
governments shall be appropriated to such use by the county legislative
bodies.” Also, the budget resolution
approved by the County Commission
states that the salary, wages, or enumeration of each official, employee, or
agent of the county will not exceed expenditures that accompany this
resolution.
Therefore, the salaries that exceeded line-item appropriations were expenditures
not approved by the County Commission . These deficiencies exist because management
failed to hold spending to the limits authorized by the County
Commission , which resulted in
unauthorized expenditures.
RECOMMENDATION
Expenditures should be held within appropriations approved
by the County Commission .
_____________________________
FINDING 11.03 THE
SCHOOL DEPARTMENT HAD DEFICIENCIES IN THE USE OF FEDERAL SPECIAL EDUCATION
CLUSTER FUNDS(Noncompliance Under
Government Auditing Standards and OMB Circular A-133)
On September 29,
2010 , the State of Tennessee ,
Department of Education, Division of Special Education released a monitoring
report on the Special Education Cluster programs in Giles
County for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 . The results of that monitoring disclosed the
following deficiencies: A. The School Department allowed an Odyssey software
program paid for and tagged as equipment purchased with IDEA Recovery Act funds
to be used by
all students, rather than exclusively by special education
students. The School Department has
subsequently repaid the $50,000 in unallowable costs to the Tennessee
Department of Education from the General
Purpose School
Fund.
B. The School Department allowed an IDEA funded teacher to
work with higher level kindergarten students from December 2009 through May
2010. The School Department calculated the time spent on unallowable activities
at
76.5 hours, for a total salary and benefits cost of $2,910.
The School Department has subsequently
repaid the unallowable costs to the Tennessee Department of Education from the
General Purpose School Fund. This monitoring report along with management’s
responses and corrective action plans may be obtained from the state Department
of Education, Division of Special Education,
_________________________
OFFICE OF CIRCUIT, GENERAL SESSIONS, AND
JUVENILE COURTS CLERK FINDING 11.04 THE OFFICE DID NOT DEPOSIT SOME
FUNDS WITHIN THREE DAYS OF COLLECTION
(Noncompliance Under Government Auditing Standards)
In some instances, the clerk did not deposit funds within
three days of collection. Section 5-8-207, Tennessee Code Annotated (TCA ),
requires county officials to deposit public funds to the office bank account
within three days of collection. This
deficiency is the result of management oversight. The delay in depositing the funds increases
the risks of fraud and misappropriation.
RECOMMENDATION
The clerk should ensure that all funds are deposited to the
office bank account within three days of collection as required by state
statute.
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE
– CIRCUIT, GENERAL SESSIONS, AND
JUVENILE COURTS CLERK
I would like to add that there was no fraud or
misappropriation of funds found. Our auditor
sat down with us and showed us the problem, and we have taken steps to correct
it. Deposits will be taken to the bank in a manner to comply with TCA
Section 5-8-207.
_____________________________
FINDING 11.05 THE COURT SOFTWARE DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE APPLICATION
CONTROLS
(Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Under Government
Auditing Standards) The following deficiencies relating to the office’s
software application were identified:
A. Although the application was designed to generate a
consecutive number for each receipt, the auditor observed instances of skipped
receipt numbers on daily collection reports. These skips could not be explained
by the vendor. On other occasions, one receipt number was assigned to multiple
receipts.
B. Users could receipt collections to a previous date. This
created a skip in the receipt numbers listed on the current day’s collection
report. However, because of the irregularities noted in Item A., it would be difficult to
determine what caused the skip.
C. On a least one occasion, the software application
generated a check to the wrong payee. These
deficiencies could call into question the reliability and integrity of
information maintained in the system. Controls addressing these deficiencies
have been implemented by the vendor; therefore, these deficiencies have been
corrected.
_____________________________
OFFICES OF CLERK AND
MASTER, REGISTER, AND SHERIFF FINDING 11.06
DUTIES WERE NOT SEGREGATED ADEQUATELY
(Internal Control
– Significant Deficiency Under
Government Auditing Standards)
Duties were not segregated adequately among the officials
and employees in the Offices of Clerk and Master, Register, and Sheriff. The officials and employees responsible for maintaining
accounting records were also involved in receipting, depositing, and/or disbursing
funds. Accounting standards provide
that internal control disbursing funds.
Accounting standards provide that internal controls be designed to provide
reasonable assurance of the reliability in financial reporting and of the effectiveness
and efficiency in operations. This lack
of segregation of duties is the result of management decisions based on the
availability of financial resources and is a significant deficiency in internal
controls that increases the risk of unauthorized transactions. Also, this deficiency is the result of
management’s failure to correct the finding noted in the prior-year audit
report.
RECOMMENDATION
The clerk and master, register, and sheriff should segregate
duties to the extent possible using available resources.
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – REGISTER
The cost of hiring enough employees to segregate each step
involved is not feasible for the Register’s Office. We now have only two employees in the
office. The budget will not allow us to
increase our staff to comply with this recommendation.
AUDITOR’S COMMENT
We have not recommended hiring additional employees. We realize that due to limited resources and
personnel, management may not be able to fully segregate duties among employees.
However, duties should be segregated to the extent possible.